SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've been testing gnome 3 (GSB) and everything is running well.. is not that bad but it could be better, one thing that is really annoying me is that i can't get my file's properties, if right click a file and go to properties, nautilus freezes.
the problem with the icons in the upper bar is solved.
Last edited by michaelinux; 04-13-2011 at 05:04 PM.
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
I don't fully understand the reasons why GNOME 2 was dropped from Slackware, but perhaps GNOME 3 may become an official part of future Slackware releases? It would be great to see the return of GNOME to the Slackware desktop.
I don't fully understand the reasons why GNOME 2 was dropped from Slackware, but perhaps GNOME 3 may become an official part of future Slackware releases? It would be great to see the return of GNOME to the Slackware desktop.
From what I understand, Gnome was dropped simply because it took too much time and effort to build and maintain. In contrast, KDE is relatively easy to build and has only a fraction of the number of packages. If you search back on these forums you'll no doubt find more detail if you're really interested.
I guess whether Gnome ever becomes part of official Slackware again will depend on whether that situation has changed.
gnome/*: Removed from -current, and turned over to community support and
distribution. I'm not going to rehash all the reasons behind this, but it's
been under consideration for more than four years. There are already good
projects in place to provide Slackware GNOME for those who want it, and
these are more complete than what Slackware has shipped in the past. So, if
you're looking for GNOME for Slackware -current, I would recommend looking at
these two projects for well-built packages that follow a policy of minimal
interference with the base Slackware system:
There is also Dropline, of course, which is quite popular. However, due to
their policy of adding PAM and replacing large system packages (like the
entire X11 system) with their own versions, I can't give quite the same sort
of nod to Dropline. Nevertheless, it remains another choice, and it's _your_
system, so I will also mention their project:
Please do not incorrectly interpret any of this as a slight against GNOME
itself, which (although it does usually need to be fixed and polished beyond
the way it ships from upstream more so than, say, KDE or XFce) is a decent
desktop choice. So are a lot of others, but Slackware does not need to ship
every choice. GNOME is and always has been a moving target (even the
"stable" releases usually aren't quite ready yet) that really does demand a
team to keep up on all the changes (many of which are not always well
documented). I fully expect that this move will improve the quality of both
Slackware itself, and the quality (and quantity) of the GNOME options
available for it.
Folks, this is how open source is supposed to work. Enjoy. :-)
I tried the GSB install of Gnome 3 last week, and I wasn't too fond of it in its current state. It seemed HIGHLY unstable. I may try again when Gnome 3 and 13.37 settle down a bit more.
I'm curious why slackware users would want Gnome in the first place? I've used Gnome in the past on other distributions and I never saw what was so great about it. Xfce gives you a native GTK desktop, uses less resources and is less buggy. I don't know, I guess I don't ask very much from my desktop though either.
I'm curious why slackware users would want Gnome in the first place? I've used Gnome in the past on other distributions and I never saw what was so great about it. Xfce gives you a native GTK desktop, uses less resources and is less buggy. I don't know, I guess I don't ask very much from my desktop though either.
Personally, I'm not interested in running GNOME as my primary DE. However, there are some fundamental changes in how the UI works that was implemented with GNOME 3, and I'm curious as to what I will think about them after I use it.
As for GNOME on Slackware, I'm also more interested in having a number of the libraries and other dependencies for when I want to use some applications that require all of them under XFCE.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.