Quote:
|
Quote:
they are just using you. You could win my respect but responding me in that way I know you don't deserve it. I am talking with total honesty and what you've answered about Slackware seems a TV announce. The conflict is not in your opinion or in what you do. Do you have some Rock Star complex? It is just that in practice all is more related than people assume. I've explained it clearly and my target wasn't you but the new users. Again I am not attacking you, I've just quoted you to express a related opinion of mine. Why do you think you must "defend yourself"? And about my stupid 54 colums. The same I've said to others, insulting here is cheap and coward. Now It's me who PLONK you. Walter |
Hm, after addressing me like this, you've won nothing but the fact that I'll ignore further posts from you.
Remember that the only insults (to me, the other posters, the resident moderator and the owner of this forum) have come from you. Not from me. Eric |
Quote:
I am mystified by your hostile attitude. |
Following a private conversation I had with eloi today by email plus reading what he just wrote on this thread, I am arriving at the conclusion that whatever I can say, I will be always wrong and he will be always right. So I will simply ignore him from now on.
|
So, systemd or what? :/
|
Quote:
ignore me? The same kind of answer that you did me when I asked you about dhcpcd in the article of your blog (I linked in other of my posts here). The typical "We all had no problem, you are the only one that have a problem". Tell me Mr Democracy. Why all BSDs, Debian, Redhat and derivatives uses dhclient? See how I can use the same demagogic tricks? But I don't, all my opinions are mine and based in my experience. I do not talk in the name of others or hypocritically in defense of others. And if I see that I am wrong I have the eggs to admit and apologize. If an honest approach annoy or even insult some guys here then yes, I've insulted you all. Walter |
Eric, you may take interest in this article batch, as should anyone else concerned about Linux's future:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/08/g...lans-detailed/ http://www.zdnet.com/gnome-os-is-on-...nt-7000002379/ http://www.itworld.com/it-management...ev-environment http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/2012/08/07/gnome-os/ The plans for creating this OS have their foundations in systemd completely. If you THINK for a second this is false, then read this WhiteBoard DIRECTLY off GNOME's webpage: https://live.gnome.org/GnomeOS/Design/Whiteboards/ and check this page out also: https://live.gnome.org/GnomeTalks?hi...=%28systemd%29 Go watch this video and listen CAREFULLY at what Lennart is saying at the Gnome conference: http://2011.videos.desktopsummit.org...20Sessions.ogv This IS the future of Linux if Poettering has his way, if we allow Red Hat to take control, and let out of control developers do as they please without a system of checks and balances... Linux isn't going to be Linux anymore. It's going to be something else, and a far cry from what it originally was. |
@Eloi #487 The problem with you is that when you are wrong you are not able to see it, let alone admit it and apologize.
|
Quote:
Eloi, can you please stop with the abusive line wrap ? I think everyone is really pissed off by this. |
I did not know systemd was not POSIX compliant:
Source: http://www.itworld.com/it-management...new-linux-path Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
And the remark about "init will not turn on cgroups" seems way off the mark to me. Sure, init itself won't, be we're turning it on in rc.S, and that works just fine. |
Quote:
|
Now hear this CFB
Quote:
Weird as it may sound I think I kind of understand what you have been trying to say in your past posts but since English isn't your first language you had trouble expressing yourself articulately and you let yourself be sidetracked in the most obscure ways. That said, if your command of the English language is good enough to provoke and insult fellow LQ members repeatedly, accuse a LQ moderator of trolling and remain argumentative after being warned repeatedly then it is good enough to receive this final warning. Now hear this CFB: Warning: You have violated these LQ Rules: 4. Do not post if you do not have anything constructive to say in the post. 7. Challenge others' points of view and opinions, but do so respectfully and thoughtfully ... without insult and personal attack. Additionally you have repeatedly and deliberately violated a moderators directive, valuing your own posts over what's good for the LQ community. It's time for a wee timeout. Feel free to email me when you're done with introspection. |
Quote:
BTW... on a humorous note, I think I've finally found who Lennart reminds me of... http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wilhuff_Tarkin |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM. |