Quote:
Sometimes I'm running Slack because it's easy, other times I think I'm running it because I support Pat's one finger salute! :( |
Quote:
Puttering clearly doesn't. |
Apart from the pros and cons of day-to-day use of systemd instead of init, will this not have major implications for anyone who upgrades Slackware as opposed to doing a clean install when a new version is released?
|
Quote:
But I think we can only see how mach impact a switch would have when and if a switch occurs. |
Freedom or power?
I will be bluntly and a bit philosopher too. I wish people here
don't take some level of abstraction like "off topic" but like a search of the real causes of the issue. Let's analyze our weak points. Personally I disagree with Stallman in he mistakes cause for effect. Monopolies are not evil but are a bad symptom and yes, they are mainly the result of consumerism. "You can", "Just do it", don't think, buy and drop, buy and drop. Final users (the "masses", that all nouveau Che Guevara out there pretend to defend), are the real dictator. But, at the same time if you take a look to history, you know that the (voluntary?) lack of conciousness of people is an unbeatable enemy. Including those behind monopolies, they think that they really take "advantage" with their mafia practices (like closing the code). The gentleman's solution in this case is "don't buy it". Around 1996 I reach to the sad conclusion that I was not able to buy sport shoes not made in China. So the alternative to "don't buy it" was to be barefoot. Do you like Google "modern" and "innovated" today interface? Eat it! So, taking in care you are in front an unbeatable enemy, what to do? I force myself (hardly) to think that Stallman took the pragmatic way: demagogy. He did the dirty job, he became a politic and crucified himself to save all of us :-). We are not reinventing the wheel, it's just one wheel, an giant wheel, and we are in one of its infinite axis and perhaps condemned to see the circus going on. This wheel is not moved by the wish of freedom; it is moved by envy. This is not a today problem, and the image of the wheel could at least give you some hope "We were able to slip away in the past we will be able in the future" you may think. But today we assist to the problem's "metastasis". Too much people in the world, the unbeatable enemy grows out of control (like the 1985 Brazil film's giant samurai). The today "more is better" culture should stop now. Obviously this will not happen thus tomorrow you will not "can". You will have neither GPS nor milk. Please, before calling me pessimist (or "defeatist", like Stallman did) take in care that posting this could be considered a pure optimistic act. |
As a side note to this thread I hope Slackware switches to the new(not really new they have been around for a few years now) Free/Net BSD rc.conf init scripts. So much cleaner than what we have now, and much more saner than systemD.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=rc&sektion=8 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...ml#post4726292 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=142679 I'm sure the Slackware team will make the right decision if they have to make a choice. Some people already use pkgsrc on Slackware http://code.google.com/p/pkgsrc-on-slack/ There's even a distro. http://voltalinux.sicurezzarete.com/ Others use Crux ports on Slackware, which is Linux but cool nonetheless. http://code.google.com/p/crux4slack/ |
The decisions of the Slackware team with regard to systemd will be highly influenced by the shared opinion as voiced in my signature.
Eric |
Quote:
|
Can anybody ask Miquel van Smoorenburg if he would still maintain init if all Linux distros minus Slackware moved to Systemd?
|
Quote:
Maintaining sysvinit would be less effort than dealing with systemd related problems by many, many orders of magnitude. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM. |