Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
12-14-2012, 08:23 AM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 3,222
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackRider
Yes, but it is not the OSE version. It is the hell spawned proprietary version!
|
The OSE version is no more. There is only one.
Quote:
Before version 4.0, there were two editions of VirtualBox: a full binary containing all features and an "Open Source Edition" (OSE) with source code. With version 4.0, there is only one version any more, which is open source, and the closed-source components have been moved to a separate extension pack.
|
|
|
2 members found this post helpful.
|
12-14-2012, 08:32 AM
|
#17
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2011
Posts: 295
Rep:
|
Nice to know!
Then there is no reason for trying to compile VirtualBox in a 64 bit environment unless you have specific needs or are just experimenting.
Last edited by BlackRider; 12-14-2012 at 08:33 AM.
|
|
|
12-14-2012, 02:55 PM
|
#18
|
Moderator
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware [64]-X.{0|1|2|37|-current} ::12<=X<=15, FreeBSD_12{.0|.1}
Posts: 6,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackRider
No way. 32 bit stuff is needed in order to fully compile VirtualBox. The best you can aim for is to find a precompiled package for 64 bit and install it. Or install a 32 bit compatibility layer.
|
That was the key peice missing from my understanding of "why" - obvious when you think about it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD
Or just use the installer from Oracle, works fine and does not need multi-lib.
|
Which seems to be what everyone was doing as indicated in other threads and looks like the best way to go.
But still I was hoping to find a Slackbuild that repackaged the output of the installer as many others do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisretusn
The OSE version is no more. There is only one.
|
This also had eluded me, I still had OSE in the back of the brain from earlier installs, now I know...
Thanks to all - sorry for the thread hijack.
|
|
|
11-27-2013, 07:02 PM
|
#19
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware 14.1 Kernel 3.12.1
Posts: 103
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD
Same as I have used.
Host OS Slackware 14.0 32 bit
Virtualbox 4.2.4, installed with the Oracle installer
CPU AMD Athlon QL-66 (supports hardware virtualization, otherwise I couldn't have run the 64 bit VM)
Tested it with a Win2K VM, kernel complains about 32 bit CPU.
EDIT: Just made a short test with Slackware 14.0 64 Bit host OS on a Phenom II CPU, behaves like you have described it.
So I change my conclusion to:
Quote:
So setting the correct template seems to be mandatory if you are using a 32 bit host OS.
|
|
I have also been playing around with choosing different templates. I found that with the generic Linux 64 template, you will have no access to other NIC then the e1000. I did not find a way to add them manually. In other words, it seems the templates do have some "magic"
|
|
|
11-28-2013, 09:32 AM
|
#20
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Almere, Netherlands
Distribution: slack 7.1 till latest and -current, LFS
Posts: 368
Rep:
|
and all these problems above, made me happy that I use VMware.
later you will have issues with videodrivers, etc on VirtualBox
|
|
|
11-28-2013, 09:53 AM
|
#21
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware 14.1 Kernel 3.12.1
Posts: 103
Rep:
|
Oops...
Don't know on what I was on when I read this thread and posted. I'm also using VMware and not Virtualbox!
@bartgymnast: what template do you advice for VMware and Slackware 14.1?
|
|
|
11-28-2013, 10:05 AM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Northeastern Michigan, where Carhartt is a Designer Label
Distribution: Slackware 32- & 64-bit Stable
Posts: 3,541
|
A 64-bit box, install 64-bit VirtualBox (from http://download.virtualbox.org/virtu...inux_amd64.run). Be sure to get the Extension Pack ( http://download.virtualbox.org/virtu...5.vbox-extpack).
Read the instructions.
That VirtualBox installs and functions properly on Slackware 64-bit 14.0 and 14.1.
You can then install any 32-bit or 64-bit OS as a guest in that 64-bit installation.
You do not need nor do you require Multilib to install or use 64-bit VirtualBox.
You can install 32-bit VirtualBox on a 64-bit machine but... why?
In spite of the religious controversy about the binary version or the compile-it-yourself version, the one from Oracle works the other way sometimes has problems with useful things like USB... I prefer "works," you mileage may vary.
Hope this helps some.
|
|
|
11-28-2013, 11:38 AM
|
#23
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,261
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bartgymnast
and all these problems above, made me happy that I use VMware.
later you will have issues with videodrivers, etc on VirtualBox
|
+1. No problem to run a 64 bit VM on a 32 bit host, easier to manage, and doesn't make my Thinkpad overheat as VirtualBox does.
The are some limitations though, for instance of video drivers that in some case do not honor "nomodeset", but all in all I find VMplayer pretty handy.
|
|
|
11-28-2013, 12:41 PM
|
#24
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didier Spaier
+1. No problem to run a 64 bit VM on a 32 bit host, easier to manage, and doesn't make my Thinkpad overheat as VirtualBox does.
|
If a software is able to overheat your machine there is a flaw in that machine's cooling system. Virtualbox can not go for more then 100% CPU load, which your cooling system should be able to handle, regardless which software runs the CPU at 100%.
Having said that, I use both, Virtualbox and VMware Player and until now I had no driver problems with any of them.
|
|
|
11-28-2013, 04:25 PM
|
#25
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Almere, Netherlands
Distribution: slack 7.1 till latest and -current, LFS
Posts: 368
Rep:
|
@eRJe: I use the generic Linux kernel 3.x (in workstation 10.0)
|
|
|
11-29-2013, 08:10 PM
|
#26
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,190
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bartgymnast
and all these problems above, made me happy that I use VMware.
later you will have issues with videodrivers, etc on VirtualBox
|
VMware Player even doesn't install on my computer and it doesn't say what's wrong nor which log file to look into. Very MS-ish software.
|
|
|
11-29-2013, 08:29 PM
|
#27
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware 14.1 Kernel 3.12.1
Posts: 103
Rep:
|
@bartgymnast: thanks. I'm using ESXi icw vsphere 5.5 which only goes up to kernel 2.6. I'm using that atm which enabled at least the nic.
|
|
|
11-30-2013, 02:44 PM
|
#28
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by guanx
VMware Player even doesn't install on my computer and it doesn't say what's wrong nor which log file to look into. Very MS-ish software.
|
For some reason VMware Player thinks it encountered an error when installing on Slackware. Only that there is no error, it is running fine after a forced install with --ignore-errors.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
11-30-2013, 03:45 PM
|
#29
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2011
Location: Texas, USA
Distribution: LFS-SVN, Gentoo~amd64, CentOS-7, Slackware64-current, FreeBSD-11.1, Arch
Posts: 229
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by guanx
VMware Player even doesn't install on my computer and it doesn't say what's wrong nor which log file to look into. Very MS-ish software.
|
Have you carefully checked the source code for VMware? Oh wait...
|
|
|
11-30-2013, 10:52 PM
|
#30
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,190
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD
For some reason VMware Player thinks it encountered an error when installing on Slackware. Only that there is no error, it is running fine after a forced install with --ignore-errors.
|
Thanks very much for the tip! It now installs. The problem might be that the installer can't setup the bridged virtual net. My guest system actually cannot connect to anywhere when I choose "bridged networking".
This can be fixed by killing the vmnet-bridge process and re-launch it with the correct "-i" option. I've searched /etc/rc.d/init.d but found vmnet-bridge in nowhere. Any idea how to keep this settings across system restart? Thanks!
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|