SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I mean we had java outside of the clean install for the while it was the main thing all around, and we do ship the alternate browser (Seamonkey) anyways.
It's not that it won't be installed by who depends on it, we merely are moving on...
It also says "Only needed if you want to run the automated test suite in the llvm/test directory."
How do you build llvm without the tests? I couldn't figure that out with the current stable version (8.0.1), but maybe it has since been added in the master?
It turns out that python3 support was added recently in upstream llvm, but maybe it will be a while before this in a stable release?
How do you build llvm without the tests? I couldn't figure that out with the current stable version (8.0.1), but maybe it has since been added in the master?
It turns out that python3 support was added recently in upstream llvm, but maybe it will be a while before this in a stable release?
I checked llvm-8.0.1 in current and neither option avoids the python check in their cmake configure, but it appears that despite a comment above the relevant check explicitly saying python2 must be found and python3 is not supported it will pass when only python3 is installed... Its not clear to me from reading their cmake files how much of the python dependency those configure arguments avoid.
We will probably have to wait to early or mid 2020 before llvm10 is out which hopefully works correctly with python3.
I mean we had java outside of the clean install for the while it was the main thing all around, and we do ship the alternate browser (Seamonkey) anyways.
It's not that it won't be installed by who depends on it, we merely are moving on...
I mean we had java outside of the clean install for the while it was the main thing all around, and we do ship the alternate browser (Seamonkey) anyways.
It's not that it won't be installed by who depends on it, we merely are moving on...
just my 2c
Even though I rely on firefox in some cases, I see no problem to exclude firefox completely from the distribution and put in on SBo only.
That said, I still believe naming the py3 interpreter after the name of py1 interpreter a bad idea. Isn't autoconf well prepared to pick up either python2 or python3 automatically if python is absent? Why mandate the confusion?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
