LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-27-2014, 02:14 AM   #76
kikinovak
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, CentOS
Posts: 2,367

Rep: Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ser Olmy View Post
Centralized account management is a must in any enterprise environment. Slackware does not currently offer this (but it's fairly easy to add).
I wouldn't exactly call this "fairly easy". With Slackware, I've been using a NIS/NFS combination for the job, and I had to rely on the Debian documentation before writing my own (which I published on docs.slackware.com, search "roaming profiles"). I tried LDAP/NFS, and after an extended period where I thought my head was going to explode, I simply gave up.
 
Old 07-27-2014, 06:03 AM   #77
Ser Olmy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,303

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by kikinovak View Post
I wouldn't exactly call this "fairly easy". With Slackware, I've been using a NIS/NFS combination for the job, and I had to rely on the Debian documentation before writing my own (which I published on docs.slackware.com, search "roaming profiles"). I tried LDAP/NFS, and after an extended period where I thought my head was going to explode, I simply gave up.
What I meant to say, is that adding PAM is fairly easy.

I'd say you're quite right about Slackware and NIS. I learned a lot about that from a previous thread in which we both participated, and recently I discovered that some rights/account management commands simply do not work on NIS-enabled Slackware. I haven't reported this as a bug (yet), and the fact that no-one else seems to have noticed speaks volumes about the current position of Slackware in the enterprise.
 
Old 07-27-2014, 03:44 PM   #78
ReaperX7
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: FreeBSD 11.0-Current Slackware64-Current
Posts: 4,835
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454
Yes, but Slackware isn't a distribution geared at any specific usage or platform. Slackware is what you the system administrator make it out to be. Slackware gives you all the tools to give you a generalized foundation to build a system specific and customized for your usage needs. It offers nothing more or less, however you the administrator and deployer of said system is expected to know everything else you need to know to tune Slackware to fit your specific needs.

If you aren't capable of this, then you aren't ready enough to use Slackware for that purpose. As blunt as that sounds, it's the truth.
 
Old 07-27-2014, 05:04 PM   #79
kikinovak
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, CentOS
Posts: 2,367

Rep: Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaperX7 View Post
Yes, but Slackware isn't a distribution geared at any specific usage or platform. Slackware is what you the system administrator make it out to be. Slackware gives you all the tools to give you a generalized foundation to build a system specific and customized for your usage needs. It offers nothing more or less, however you the administrator and deployer of said system is expected to know everything else you need to know to tune Slackware to fit your specific needs.

If you aren't capable of this, then you aren't ready enough to use Slackware for that purpose. As blunt as that sounds, it's the truth.
I'll take you at your word, then. Here's a specific task for you, Reaper X7.

1. Setup centralized authentication using LDAP and NFS on a Slackware server and Slackware clients.

2. Write a detailed step-by-step documentation about the process.

3. Publish it on http://docs.slackware.com.

4. Eventually, maintain all the core packages that have to be rebuilt in the process.

Thanks in advance,

Niki
 
11 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-27-2014, 05:30 PM   #80
T3slider
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-14.1
Posts: 2,352

Rep: Reputation: 807Reputation: 807Reputation: 807Reputation: 807Reputation: 807Reputation: 807Reputation: 807
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaperX7 View Post
If you aren't capable of this, then you aren't ready enough to use Slackware for that purpose. As blunt as that sounds, it's the truth.
Maybe Pat should stop shipping any libc -- there are multiple options now and Slackware shouldn't decide which one to force upon you. If you aren't capable of compiling your own c library and correspondingly recompiling everything against it, then you aren't ready enough to use Slackware for that purpose. As blunt as that sounds, it's the truth.

(Ridiculous, isn't it?)

I am neither pro- nor anti-PAM inclusion but I fail to see how its inclusion somehow forces a specific usage. If anything, PAM's current exclusion forces less flexible authentication options onto all Slackware users. It would be easier to make a PAM-enabled installation act like existing Slackware than for every user to add PAM to their installations.

Last edited by T3slider; 07-27-2014 at 05:31 PM.
 
5 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-27-2014, 08:14 PM   #81
Arkerless
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: Give me Slack or give me death.
Posts: 81

Rep: Reputation: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by T3slider View Post
I am neither pro- nor anti-PAM inclusion but I fail to see how its inclusion somehow forces a specific usage. If anything, PAM's current exclusion forces less flexible authentication options onto all Slackware users. It would be easier to make a PAM-enabled installation act like existing Slackware than for every user to add PAM to their installations.
It would be, except that nowhere near all users need PAM. I'd be willing to bet the percentage is pretty small, in fact. Granted it might grow larger if it were easier to do. But on the other side, if it were not more difficult than it should be to do properly, we'd probably already have third party drop-in packages ready for anyone that needs it too.

For now I trust Mr Volkerdings judgement. He excluded it for good reason, and if he takes another look at it I would be very interested in his results. But I dont have any need for it myself, so naturally I am more worried about any possible ill effects than in yet more features I dont need and will never intentionally use.

Last edited by Arkerless; 07-28-2014 at 05:24 PM.
 
Old 07-27-2014, 08:29 PM   #82
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Carrollton, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 1,718

Rep: Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by kikinovak View Post
I'll take you at your word, then. Here's a specific task for you, Reaper X7.

1. Setup centralized authentication using LDAP and NFS on a Slackware server and Slackware clients.

2. Write a detailed step-by-step documentation about the process.

3. Publish it on http://docs.slackware.com.

4. Eventually, maintain all the core packages that have to be rebuilt in the process.

Thanks in advance,

Niki
I'll nibble versus bite.

I've just downloaded and compiled libnss_ldap. I don't know what I would have to set up to test it. If you give me an idea of how to do that, I'll see if libnss_ldap works without PAM.
 
Old 07-27-2014, 10:59 PM   #83
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Carrollton, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 1,718

Rep: Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537Reputation: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Cranium View Post
I'll nibble versus bite.

I've just downloaded and compiled libnss_ldap. I don't know what I would have to set up to test it. If you give me an idea of how to do that, I'll see if libnss_ldap works without PAM.
Actually, now that I've looked, there's a perfectly good SlackBuild at SlackBuilds for libnss_ldap.

Why doesn't *that* work?
 
Old 07-28-2014, 03:50 AM   #84
kikinovak
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, CentOS
Posts: 2,367

Rep: Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276Reputation: 1276
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Cranium View Post
Actually, now that I've looked, there's a perfectly good SlackBuild at SlackBuilds for libnss_ldap.

Why doesn't *that* work?
Yes, I know. And there's also this:

http://slackbuilds.org/repository/14...nss-pam-ldapd/

The only problem here is that there's no usable documentation on how to use that stuff. Only sparse/incomplete/wrong bits of information scattered around the Internet.

Here's an example of what I would call "usable documentation":

https://help.ubuntu.com/14.04/server...ap-server.html
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-28-2014, 06:37 AM   #85
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,678

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaperX7 View Post
Yes, but Slackware isn't a distribution geared at any specific usage or platform. Slackware is what you the system administrator make it out to be. Slackware gives you all the tools to give you a generalized foundation to build a system specific and customized for your usage needs. It offers nothing more or less, however you the administrator and deployer of said system is expected to know everything else you need to know to tune Slackware to fit your specific needs.

If you aren't capable of this, then you aren't ready enough to use Slackware for that purpose. As blunt as that sounds, it's the truth.
With this remark, towards two seasoned Slackware users, you have disqualified yourself. There is a difference between having the tools and building blocks available, and accumulating the knowledge to create a new solution from these building blocks.

Please go back to your LFS distro (which has literally written down every step you need to take to create a LFS computer from scratch, so that the amount of thinking can be kept to a minimum) and leave Slackware to us.
Or else, prove that you know what we are talking about and write a comprehensive article on docs.slackware.com explaining how to setup a centralized authentication setup for Slackware using NIS/LDAP/NFS.

Eric
 
14 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-28-2014, 11:40 AM   #86
NoStressHQ
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2010
Location: Lausanne - Switzerland ( Bordeaux - France / Montreal - QC - Canada)
Distribution: Slackware Leet - 32/64bit
Posts: 344

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
Unforgivable...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaperX7 View Post
Yes, but Slackware isn't a distribution geared at any specific usage or platform. Slackware is what you the system administrator make it out to be. Slackware gives you all the tools to give you a generalized foundation to build a system specific and customized for your usage needs. It offers nothing more or less, however you the administrator and deployer of said system is expected to know everything else you need to know to tune Slackware to fit your specific needs.

If you aren't capable of this, then you aren't ready enough to use Slackware for that purpose. As blunt as that sounds, it's the truth.
Yeah... Sometimes you "sounds" like The Kid in Eastwood's Unforgiven... You installed a bunch of packages using command line and you think you're a "real hacker"...

In real life some tasks are less "romantic" than they seems to be as a hobbyist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lYVggyHRkY

Last edited by NoStressHQ; 07-28-2014 at 02:29 PM. Reason: Fixed a french bad habit when writing in English :)
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-28-2014, 03:14 PM   #87
genss
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2013
Posts: 619

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
wow

anyway
if my opinion matters, that it probably does not, PAM should not be added to slackware
it looks like a framework made 'cuz companies could not agree on one standard (or two, one for files)
 
Old 07-28-2014, 05:31 PM   #88
ReaperX7
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: FreeBSD 11.0-Current Slackware64-Current
Posts: 4,835
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454Reputation: 1454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
With this remark, towards two seasoned Slackware users, you have disqualified yourself. There is a difference between having the tools and building blocks available, and accumulating the knowledge to create a new solution from these building blocks.

Please go back to your LFS distro (which has literally written down every step you need to take to create a LFS computer from scratch, so that the amount of thinking can be kept to a minimum) and leave Slackware to us.
Or else, prove that you know what we are talking about and write a comprehensive article on docs.slackware.com explaining how to setup a centralized authentication setup for Slackware using NIS/LDAP/NFS.

Eric
Sorry but to properly respond as I know best Eric, I'll respond to say this to your remarks...

Naw... I don't use those so I don't feel the need to, not do I need to. You and kikinovak are both mature enough, at least I hope, so you or both of you can do it rather than point fingers at me crying foul. Otherwise, I'm done on this subject, so piss and moan about your ineptness without me.
 
Old 07-28-2014, 05:54 PM   #89
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware{,64}-{14.1,current} on a Lenovo Thinkpad W520
Posts: 5,360

Rep: Reputation: 1486Reputation: 1486Reputation: 1486Reputation: 1486Reputation: 1486Reputation: 1486Reputation: 1486Reputation: 1486Reputation: 1486Reputation: 1486
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaperX7 View Post
I'm done on this subject
Better late than never.
 
6 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-29-2014, 03:19 AM   #90
Slax-Dude
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Valadares, Portugal
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 302

Rep: Reputation: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by genss View Post
if my opinion matters, that it probably does not, PAM should not be added to slackware
it looks like a framework made 'cuz companies could not agree on one standard (or two, one for files)
That is the point of PAM: to make authentication modular, so you don't have to use just one standard.
This way, you can use ldap, kerberos, etc...
You can even use the good old reliable linux flat files (shadow, passwd, group).

Just imagine having 50 computers.
Now imagine that every user should be able to work on any one of them.
To do this, you can:
a) replicate passwd, shadow, group to every one of those computers... every time a user is created or changes their password...
b) have some sort of central authentication scheme that the 50 computers use.

If you are a sysadmin that has to deal with that, you will probably chose b)
Now imagine 500 or 5000 computers... b) will look even more attractive

Ser Olmy explained it best in this post: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...ml#post5209961
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PAM and Slackware 10.2 darkarcon2015 Slackware 15 10-20-2007 02:32 PM
PAM Available For Slackware 10.0 eric.r.turner Slackware 14 09-22-2006 12:08 PM
PAM for my Slackware rmg Linux - Newbie 3 04-06-2006 01:10 PM
does slackware 10 support PAM? joroxx Slackware - Installation 2 11-16-2004 12:06 AM
pam mount in slackware 10 qwijibow Linux - Software 1 08-06-2004 08:37 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration