[SOLVED] Slackware 14.2 is coming , but will the slackbuilds will also be updated accordingly?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
In normal cycle (when new stable is released), we normally do not update the whole repo by ourself and we need maintainer to pro actively submit updates via submission forms.
During development cycles like nowadays, some packages are broken due to updates in current so we need to fix things to make sure they are fixed when new stable is released. Some maintainer prefer to wait until next stable
It's your system and you have responsibility for its security.
Thanks for the reminder. PPA maintainers have same advice for Ubuntu fans.
Quote:
You are welcome to get advice about security from many places -- LQ, upstream websites and mailing lists, LWN, the SlackBuilds.org mailing list and maintainers, specialised security mailing lists, etc.
Sorry sir. I don't have enough time to bug track and read various websites and mails for every single package which I install from SBO. Therefore, if SBO maintainers let everyone threats security of Slackware users by bad slackbuilds or buggy codes, I prefer to change my habit and use Eric and Roby repositories as main source of third party packages.
I prefer to change my habit and use Eric and Roby repositories as main source of third party packages.
Then you may need a package not provided by Eric and Robby. Will you compile it by hand or write your own SlackBuild? In such case you will also have to bug track packages and read various websites and mails for every single package you install.
Sorry sir. I don't have enough time to bug track and read various websites and mails for every single package which I install from SBO. Therefore, if SBO maintainers let everyone threats security of Slackware users by bad slackbuilds or buggy codes, I prefer to change my habit and use Eric and Roby repositories as main source of third party packages.
In general I find SBo to be pretty good with updates. But the point was that slackbuilds are maintained by volunteers, so it is true that they are sometimes abandoned, but in my experience that's for the rarer pieces of software. Just to name a few that I like--TeX Live, Libreoffice, R, Audacity, Clementine, Digikam, Duplicity, Lame, Nvidia drivers, Recoll, Transmission, Yakuake--all on SBo, all brilliant But, at least you have the freedom to choose
I appreciate the people that maintain SBo, and the people that maintain the SlackBuilds themselves. It is a valuable resource that people can share their builds and the rest can benefit from. Sometimes maintainers fall behind, or lose interest in a project which is sad but hopefully there is someone that can pick up the "Slack". I have found a few packages on there that are updated past what Alien has in his repo, So it happens to them all. (Appreciate you too Eric, I don't know what I would do if I had to compile something like LibreOffice or Plasma 5).
PS: Pale Moon is broken on -current and has been since Feburary.
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis82
Thanks for the reminder. PPA maintainers have same advice for Ubuntu fans.
Sorry sir. I don't have enough time to bug track and read various websites and mails for every single package which I install from SBO. Therefore, if SBO maintainers let everyone threats security of Slackware users by bad slackbuilds or buggy codes, I prefer to change my habit and use Eric and Roby repositories as main source of third party packages.
Travis, then perhaps Slackware is not the distro for you. With Slackware, there is PV, Eric, the team, SBO, and various tools to help, but ultimately you are the admin. If you think SBO has unmaintained packages then pick up the slack and help maintain some. Don't even get me started about the number of unmaintained or poorly maintained packages on other distros....Not naming names but 25K packages with 1k packagers is 25 per person...just saying, many of those are poorly maintained.
PS: Pale Moon is broken on -current and has been since Feburary.
It builds ok here (most recently on 29th March). I've just installed it, and it works well enough to log into LQ, and I'm posting this reply with it right now.
Apparently it still has the same lousy textbox bug that Firefox cured years ago. meh
It builds ok here (most recently on 29th March). I've just installed it, and it works well enough to log into LQ, and I'm posting this reply with it right now.
Apparently it still has the same lousy textbox bug that Firefox cured years ago. meh
Seriously? I can do a full fresh install and build Pale Moon 25.8.1 or 26.1.1 and each one gives me a seg fault. Maybe I need to refresh my mirror.
Travis, then perhaps Slackware is not the distro for you. With Slackware, there is PV, Eric, the team, SBO, and various tools to help, but ultimately you are the admin. If you think SBO has unmaintained packages then pick up the slack and help maintain some. Don't even get me started about the number of unmaintained or poorly maintained packages on other distros....Not naming names but 25K packages with 1k packagers is 25 per person...just saying, many of those are poorly maintained.
I wonder why you try to have a finger in every pipe. I didn't talk about unmaintained or poorly maintained packages. Next time read the post before quoting it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.