LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 10-15-2012, 09:38 AM   #1
kikinovak
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, Slackware64
Posts: 1,412

Rep: Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631
Slackware 14.0 review on Distrowatch


Hi fellow Slackers,

Distrowatch weekly issue #478 sports a detailed review of Slackware 14.0.

http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?is...121015#feature

Nothing new under the sun, but a little bit of publicity is always nice. I commented the review in the reader comments (as user "Microlinux").

Cheers,

Niki
 
Old 10-15-2012, 09:49 AM   #2
mudangel
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 267

Rep: Reputation: 48
"half-assed technology preview" made me smile ;-)
 
Old 10-15-2012, 09:53 AM   #3
GazL
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 3,231

Rep: Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828
Link seems down at the moment for me. Will try again later.

edit: Looks like my crappy ISP has cocked it's dns up again. switching to google's public dns sorted it out.

Last edited by GazL; 10-15-2012 at 10:18 AM.
 
Old 10-15-2012, 10:21 AM   #4
darkstar61
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2012
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 5
Quote:
running the slackware distribution is a boring experience
:d :d :d
 
Old 10-15-2012, 10:26 AM   #5
allend
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne
Distribution: Slackware-current
Posts: 3,293

Rep: Reputation: 803Reputation: 803Reputation: 803Reputation: 803Reputation: 803Reputation: 803Reputation: 803
To paraphrase, "Reading partially informed DistroWatch reviews on the Slackware distribution is a boring experience and, as the Slackbook says, that's the way slackers like it."
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-15-2012, 12:43 PM   #6
Beelzebud
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Distribution: Arch & Slackware
Posts: 95

Rep: Reputation: 22
I'd say that's a pretty fair review. The "boredom" is what drove me to Slackware. I love(d) Arch Linux, but after a year of fiddling with it, I decided I'd rather just use that machine than constantly tinker with it. It's been smooth sailing since moving to Slack. It's really nice to get your install set up, with all your 3rd party software, and know that beyond security updates, you're done. There will be no nasty surprises waiting in a daily update.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-15-2012, 01:31 PM   #7
kikinovak
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, Slackware64
Posts: 1,412

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beelzebud View Post
I'd say that's a pretty fair review. The "boredom" is what drove me to Slackware. I love(d) Arch Linux, but after a year of fiddling with it, I decided I'd rather just use that machine than constantly tinker with it. It's been smooth sailing since moving to Slack. It's really nice to get your install set up, with all your 3rd party software, and know that beyond security updates, you're done. There will be no nasty surprises waiting in a daily update.
+1 on that. I had a brief stint with Arch. The general approach and the outstanding documentation drove me to it. I even went so far as to install a few desktop clients in a production environment. Then I got badly burnt by an X.org update: no more mouse, no more keyboard, asked in the forum and got flamed because I had overlooked the relevant thread explaining the new configuration changes somewhere else on the site. That was my brief history with Arch, to be archived under a personal category of "Eternally promising but so full of surprises that it's next to unusable in production" along with Crux and Gentoo.

So Slack it is. Boring is good. No drama.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-15-2012, 01:44 PM   #8
Habitual
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Distribution: Slack14_64_Multilib
Posts: 2,738
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 630Reputation: 630Reputation: 630Reputation: 630Reputation: 630Reputation: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by kikinovak View Post
+1 on that....
So Slack it is. Boring is good. No drama.
I see your +1 and raise you ^2
 
Old 10-15-2012, 02:54 PM   #9
ReaperX7
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Distribution: LFS-SVN, Slackware-14.1, PCBSD-10.0
Posts: 2,455
Blog Entries: 14

Rep: Reputation: 593Reputation: 593Reputation: 593Reputation: 593Reputation: 593Reputation: 593
I'd rather be bored and have a system that doesn't foul up on me than one I'm fighting with each and every day to the get the simplest task done right.

Last edited by ReaperX7; 10-15-2012 at 02:57 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-15-2012, 02:59 PM   #10
dr.s
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 126

Rep: Reputation: 19
Quote:
...or perhaps it might be more accurate to say very little ever goes wrong.
That pretty much sums up what Slackware is all about.

Not sure what an exciting OS looks like, but judging by the professional and exciting OS used at work, with its non-stop security patches, reboots, and frequent crashes, I'll go with boring.
 
Old 10-15-2012, 03:34 PM   #11
kikinovak
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, Slackware64
Posts: 1,412

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr.s View Post
Not sure what an exciting OS looks like
http://us.generation-nt.com/answer/a...192323641.html

 
Old 10-15-2012, 04:17 PM   #12
samac
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Westray, Orkney
Distribution: Slackware64-14.1 (multi-lib) KDE 4.11.4
Posts: 1,399

Rep: Reputation: 131Reputation: 131
Not sure what they were doing to take so long to install. In an hour I had installed it, configured it, broke it, changed my mind about the formatting options on my ssd, re-installed it and re-configured it. I might even have started installing some extra software.

Overall it was a report written by someone with preconceptions that Slackware is somehow lacking because it doesn't do the stuff that other linux flavours do. I guess we must all be wrong and we should all move to a more progressive and exciting distribution.

samac
 
Old 10-15-2012, 04:41 PM   #13
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 14,901
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 3811Reputation: 3811Reputation: 3811Reputation: 3811Reputation: 3811Reputation: 3811Reputation: 3811Reputation: 3811Reputation: 3811Reputation: 3811Reputation: 3811
Quote:
Originally Posted by samac View Post
Not sure what they were doing to take so long to install.
This is an issue with the authors hardware. Any distro takes much longer than usual to install on his system, which is pointed out also in the comments. He must have a really slow DVD reader or harddisk.
 
Old 10-15-2012, 04:55 PM   #14
Myk267
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2012
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 73
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
The article brings up a good point: Why doesn't slackware resolve depencies?
<sets out some chairs and gets the popcorn ready>


Joking aside, I really wish the reviews would go over the fact that Slackware is like the ultimate swiss army knife for your computer.

If there's something you need, it's probably installed: I poked around for a LISP SlackBuild before figuring it out that CLISP is already installed, along with almost every other major language toolset I'd ever want. There's multiple: browsers, window managers, desktop environments, mail readers, shells, versions of the 'snake' game, (g)vi(m), music players, video players, and on and on.

And even though it has all of these, it's not slow. It's probably faster than a lot of distributions once you factor in time saved from having 90% of what you want already installed. Don't use something installed? Just ignore it, it's probably not holding you back in any way. Minimalistic Linux installs feel like a toy next to one that's full featured, cries of 'bloat' be damned.

The Slackware community isn't so vocal about our third party support but it's there: SlackBuilds.org, sbopkg.org and an impressive repository of queue files to use with sbopkg are all available to help you install extra software rather painlessly. AlienBob, rworkman and others also have repositories of software of all kinds.

Slackware doesn't hide anything from you, and it's software set is often a reflection of this: lilo, the bootloader; the package management tools, all written in shell script, open them up sometime; the build scripts for everything, again, shell script!. This simplicity keeps you, the sysadmin, in control of your machine.

Why wouldn't someone want to try Slackware? I'm not sure it's the best option for someone who has no idea of how to admin their own machine besides clicking on an icon and expecting installation to happen - good thing there's other distros for them. You might also not want to try Slackware if you want to retain respect for any other distro which no doubt does everything wrong after you get a taste of Slackadminning.

Author's Note: I didn't get paid for writing this, and neither did it come down off of a mountain written on some stone tablets.
'Bob' might have coerced me a bit; much was Slack during the writing of all previous prose. Have a nice day!

Last edited by Myk267; 10-15-2012 at 04:56 PM. Reason: hysterical raisins
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-15-2012, 06:52 PM   #15
NyteOwl
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD, others periodically
Posts: 512

Rep: Reputation: 138Reputation: 138
From all the stuff I've ever seen and read I came to the conclusion some time ago that Distrowatch doesn't like Slackware. Why I can only guess (windows users perhaps) but they seem biased in my opinion. And not just against Slackware.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The first review Calculate Linux on DistroWatch Lautre Calculate 1 04-27-2011 07:53 AM
distrowatch gave squeeze a poor review :( m_yates Debian 35 03-01-2011 09:01 PM
LXer: CDLinux 0.9.2 Community Edition Review (DistroWatch Weekly #310) LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-06-2009 01:50 PM
LXer: DistroWatch Weekly: FreeBSD 6.2, review of Pardus Linux 2007 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-15-2007 05:21 AM
OpenBSD review on DistroWatch chort *BSD 0 07-10-2004 03:16 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration