SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Personally, I'd just wait for 2.6.38. I'm running 2.6.38-rc8 and it's apparently one of the better kernels since, oh, 2.6.33 or so. The kernel developers need a slap upside their heads .. At least, Pat has a sense of humor about the mess.
Anyway, moving to 2.6.37 is a better choice than providing "LTS" for an incomplete and buggy 2.6.35 ... Who wants that kind of service?
Last edited by tpreitzel; 03-10-2011 at 06:24 PM.
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Eric has kde-4.6.1 packages, and I've got xfce-4.8 packages (both for -current).
does xf86-video-intel 2.14.901 driver, Mesa 7.11-devel from the beginning of March, and the libva Git library from early March and other related updated git pulled packages exist yet ?
Many thanks to Pat and all the team. Leet rc1 behaving quite nicely atm although I have to spend MUCH more time to really asses the release. Can't wait to get the dvd with the release # printed thereon...and the t-shirts will be priceless.
Audacious from 1337 (Audacious 2.4.3) gives this error when playing (stream, or local files):
Quote:
** WARNING **
Audacious has detected that your ALSA device has a broken timer. A workaround
is being used to prevent CPU overload. Please report this problem to your
Linux distributor or to the ALSA developers.
Also, Audacious developers said:
Quote:
Please submit bug reports to your distribution unless you built the very latest version of Audacious yourself. We do not provide end-user support.
Current release is 2.4.4 (February 22, 2011)
Current testing release is 2.5-beta1 (March 11, 2011)
I have to say that I don't see any other problem with 2.4.3, except that "ugly" notice about broken timer when playback starts, and I also don't know if 2.4.4 fixes that problem.
Audacious from 1337 (Audacious 2.4.3) gives this error when playing (stream, or local files):
*insert stuff here*
I have to say that I don't see any other problem with 2.4.3, except that "ugly" notice about broken timer when playback starts, and I also don't know if 2.4.4 fixes that problem.
I don't get either of those problems with audacious 2.4.3. o:
Last edited by tacticalbread; 03-11-2011 at 11:07 AM.
I noticed the broken timer message in audacious the other day. It seems to only show if you're using the 'default' dmix device. When I change the properties for the alsa plugin to use hw:0 the message goes away, so it looks like it's something to do with alsa's dmix. Only problem with doing this though is that unless your card can do hardware mixing, you're limited to one sound output at a time.
I tried updating to 2.4.4 but that's just the same.
Oh well.. don't know what to say then.. except that I just found this on the Audacious forum:
Quote:
..The broken timer is an ALSA problem and cannot be fixed within Audacious; it must be fixed in ALSA. That's why the message says to report the problem to your distribution or to the ALSA developers. Not to us.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.