LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2011, 06:17 PM   #61
tpreitzel
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Posts: 253

Rep: Reputation: 28

Personally, I'd just wait for 2.6.38. I'm running 2.6.38-rc8 and it's apparently one of the better kernels since, oh, 2.6.33 or so. The kernel developers need a slap upside their heads .. At least, Pat has a sense of humor about the mess.

Anyway, moving to 2.6.37 is a better choice than providing "LTS" for an incomplete and buggy 2.6.35 ... Who wants that kind of service?

Last edited by tpreitzel; 03-10-2011 at 06:24 PM.
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 03-10-2011, 06:40 PM   #62
TechU
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by rworkman View Post
Eric has kde-4.6.1 packages, and I've got xfce-4.8 packages (both for -current).
does xf86-video-intel 2.14.901 driver, Mesa 7.11-devel from the beginning of March, and the libva Git library from early March and other related updated git pulled packages exist yet ?
 
Old 03-10-2011, 07:56 PM   #63
zbreaker
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: New York
Distribution: Slack -current, siduction
Posts: 253

Rep: Reputation: 29
Many thanks to Pat and all the team. Leet rc1 behaving quite nicely atm although I have to spend MUCH more time to really asses the release. Can't wait to get the dvd with the release # printed thereon...and the t-shirts will be priceless.
 
Old 03-10-2011, 09:16 PM   #64
animeresistance
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 230

Rep: Reputation: 39
Why not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by saulgoode View Post
I just hope there isn't going to be a 14.57 Slackware.
Why not ?

Hehehehe ... kidding ... I love Slackware

Last edited by animeresistance; 03-10-2011 at 09:18 PM.
 
Old 03-10-2011, 10:41 PM   #65
dc_eros
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 294

Rep: Reputation: 39
Just upgraded to the RC1 and so far everything works fine. I have no time to re-compile virtualbox but I'll try this weekend. Works as expected.
 
Old 03-11-2011, 12:54 AM   #66
dolphin77
Member
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: Odesa, Ukraine
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 206

Rep: Reputation: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi View Post
"åtta" is exactly correct, but I could easily see it getting transliterated by the media somewhere along the line.
Yeah, my mistake. Found only this:
Code:
From volkerdi@mhd1.moorhead.msus.edu  Thu Jun 14 18:19:46 2001
Return-Path: volkerdi
Received: (from volkerdi@localhost) by darkstar.slackware.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03071; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:19:46 -0700
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Patrick J. Volkerding" <volkerdi@slackware.com>
To: root
Subject: Welcome to Linux (Slackware 8.0 "åtta")!
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.000620134926.3041A-100000@darkstar.slackware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear Pat & team, thanks again for all your work. 13.37 looks very promising. I'll definitely order a dvd copy when it is available.

Good luck and thank you.

Last edited by dolphin77; 03-11-2011 at 12:59 AM.
 
Old 03-11-2011, 08:49 AM   #67
cycojesus
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Lyon, France
Distribution: Slackware-current
Posts: 116

Rep: Reputation: 79
Does anyone knows why ruby is still a 1.9.1 when there's a 1.9.2-p136 out and 1.9.2 is the first 1.9.x considered "ready for production"?
 
Old 03-11-2011, 08:56 AM   #68
mlangdn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Kentucky
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,845

Rep: Reputation: 452Reputation: 452Reputation: 452Reputation: 452Reputation: 452
I just finished this upgrade and all is well on my end. I also upgraded Alien's kde packages also. I am in Slackware heaven.
 
Old 03-11-2011, 09:12 AM   #69
Buumi
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2010
Location: Finland
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 61

Rep: Reputation: 10
I installed it as well and it's working fine.
Thanks Pat, AlienBob, rworkman and others for great job.
 
Old 03-11-2011, 09:15 AM   #70
Andersen
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 177

Rep: Reputation: 72
Audacious from 1337 (Audacious 2.4.3) gives this error when playing (stream, or local files):

Quote:
** WARNING **
Audacious has detected that your ALSA device has a broken timer. A workaround
is being used to prevent CPU overload. Please report this problem to your
Linux distributor or to the ALSA developers.
Also, Audacious developers said:

Quote:
Please submit bug reports to your distribution unless you built the very latest version of Audacious yourself. We do not provide end-user support.
Current release is 2.4.4 (February 22, 2011)
Current testing release is 2.5-beta1 (March 11, 2011)

I have to say that I don't see any other problem with 2.4.3, except that "ugly" notice about broken timer when playback starts, and I also don't know if 2.4.4 fixes that problem.
 
Old 03-11-2011, 11:03 AM   #71
tacticalbread
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: IN
Distribution: Arch x64 multilib
Posts: 79

Rep: Reputation: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by cycojesus View Post
Does anyone knows why ruby is still a 1.9.1 when there's a 1.9.2-p136 out and 1.9.2 is the first 1.9.x considered "ready for production"?
I've got ruby 1.9.1p431 (2011-02-18 revision 30908) [i486-linux]


Quote:
Originally Posted by Andersen View Post
Audacious from 1337 (Audacious 2.4.3) gives this error when playing (stream, or local files):

*insert stuff here*

I have to say that I don't see any other problem with 2.4.3, except that "ugly" notice about broken timer when playback starts, and I also don't know if 2.4.4 fixes that problem.
I don't get either of those problems with audacious 2.4.3. o:

Last edited by tacticalbread; 03-11-2011 at 11:07 AM.
 
Old 03-11-2011, 11:25 AM   #72
Andersen
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 177

Rep: Reputation: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by tacticalbread View Post

I don't get either of those problems with audacious 2.4.3. o:
You should see the message if you launch audacious from command line. Otherwise everithing looks normal.

Last edited by Andersen; 03-11-2011 at 11:27 AM.
 
Old 03-11-2011, 11:30 AM   #73
tacticalbread
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: IN
Distribution: Arch x64 multilib
Posts: 79

Rep: Reputation: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andersen View Post
You should see the message if you launch audacious from command line.
Which I did.
 
Old 03-11-2011, 11:32 AM   #74
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,897

Rep: Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018
I noticed the broken timer message in audacious the other day. It seems to only show if you're using the 'default' dmix device. When I change the properties for the alsa plugin to use hw:0 the message goes away, so it looks like it's something to do with alsa's dmix. Only problem with doing this though is that unless your card can do hardware mixing, you're limited to one sound output at a time.

I tried updating to 2.4.4 but that's just the same.
 
Old 03-11-2011, 11:37 AM   #75
Andersen
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 177

Rep: Reputation: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by tacticalbread View Post
Which I did.
Oh well.. don't know what to say then.. except that I just found this on the Audacious forum:



Quote:
..The broken timer is an ALSA problem and cannot be fixed within Audacious; it must be fixed in ALSA. That's why the message says to report the problem to your distribution or to the ALSA developers. Not to us.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Making Slackware and Slackware Derivative Linux Distros Speak Your Language LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-29-2009 12:30 AM
About Slackware 9.1 boot disk?? ftp://ftp.kpn.be/pub/linux/slackware/slackware-9.1-is AL3OMDAH Slackware 4 04-18-2007 09:54 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration