SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i'm confused. if all distro uses the same kernel how come there are other distro that claim they have "enterprise" quality distribution? what are te main difference between the enterprise quality and just an ordinary distro if both uses the same package?
You should ask those distro providers who claim "enterprise quality distribution." That can be just a buzz word, which might not mean anything to some people ... such as myself.
And to qualify, all distros do not use the same kernel. Slackware's Pat Volkerding compiles kernels with options he selects, but he gets the source from http://kernel.org and doesn't modify it.
Some distros hack the kernel so much that it is barely recognizable from the source when they get through. Debian, SuSE, Mandrivia, Fedora, etc. are examples. Usually the "commercial distributions" do that so they have control over how the OS works. Especially those companies who provide support for their users.
Slackware is more interested in leaving control in the hands of the user.
That is how I would answer this question, but other's may see it differently. Hopefully they'll show up.
thanks. now i understand. i was just confused wethere to continue using slackware as my server or to use the what they claim "enterprise" quality distro.
You won't find a distro with better quality than Slackware. It's the oldest Linux distro, and quite stable. Just ask in the Slackware forum how well it performs for servers, or anything, and you'll get some guys who use it in the workplace to give you answers I'm sure.
"Enterprise Linux" is not just a buzzword or BS. Most enterprise distributions have three characteristics:
- Long release cycles, e.g. RHEL has an 18 month release cycle.
- Long support times, e.g. Red Hat provides security updates for seven years for their enterprise distributions.
- Backporting. When a security problem is found, a package is not updated (e.g. like it happens in Slack most of the time), but the security fix is backported.
For mission-critical applications this is often useful. The upgrade cycle is long, an operating system can safely be deployed for a long time. Besides that backporting is done to keep full binary compatibility, allowing vendors like Oracle and VMWare to guarantee that their software works on Red Hat or SUSE version so and so.
At some places Linux just has to work, and enterprise distributions are good for that. The disadvantage is that you have to pay $$$, unless you use something like CentOS.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.