Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 01:00 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 87
Rep:
|
slack and kernel 2.4.22
does anyone know if slackware is going to make the new kernel available?
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 01:14 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149
|
What do you mean make the new kernel available? I have 2.4.22 running flawlessly on my Slackware machine.
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 01:16 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 87
Original Poster
Rep:
|
i meant in slackware pkg (.tgz),
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 01:21 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 87
Original Poster
Rep:
|
how do you install it? i mean in slackware there is kernel-headers, kernel-something and kernel-something,
in kernel.org is just one file, i'm confused
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 01:33 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149
|
At the top of this forum you should find a link or thread discussing how to install a kernel for Slackware specific systems. Its very easy to follow. I would suggest following that to get the latest kernel installed. No need to wait around for someone to create it as a Slack source (tgz).
Regards.
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 01:39 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 87
Original Poster
Rep:
|
but thats for recompiling a kernel and not for removing the old one and installing a new one
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 02:39 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613
Rep:
|
Hi there one
Let me try to clear up a bit of confusion for you
You have the 2.4.21 kernel, NOT very old, and with lots of support. Reasons to upgrade your kernel would be things like Hardware not working (correctly), bugs, security holes, things like that. To upgrade something (especially a KERNEL) when it's working properly is sometimes suicide, so be careful.
Now, if you are having problems as described above, feel free to upgrade your kernel. To do that, you will want to grab the latest STABLE version from www.kernel.org and compile it. Not recompile, because this would indeed be the first time, so no 're' anything is being done
Follow the how-to above, and be sure to test it out and don't overwrite your current working kernel in the process.
Removing an old one and installing a new one is not really a great idea because of the above mentioned problems, and because you have 1 working kernel, that you know works, but you aren't sure if the new one will or not on your setup. Keep the old one until you've thoroughly tested out a new one.
Recompiling a kernel or compiling one for the first time for an 'update' is definitely recommended rather than "installpkg/upgradepkg" the new kernel. You'll get the benefit of seeing what is actually in a kernel, the speed you get from compiling your own, and of course the knowledge gained from compiling a kernel.
Anyone can 'upgradepkg package-version.tgz' but it takes a good reader and some patience to actually compile your first kernel
Cool
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 08:33 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2003
Location: Malaysia
Distribution: Slackware, LFS, CentOS
Posts: 1,307
Rep:
|
ermm MasterC, the stock kernel shipped with Slack 9 is 2.4.20...
one, kernel compiling is not hard, if you know your hardware and specific features that you need (or want), then it shouldn't be too difficult.
DaOne's thread is informative, and you should give it a try if you insist on having the latest kernel
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 09:52 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 87
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Azmeen i upgraded it to 2.4.21 using the slackware pkg (upgradepkg)
i read daone posts and i'm compiling a new kernel from source but had a problem just now when running the make bzimage command
bash-2.05b# make bzimage
make: *** No rule to make target `bzimage'. Stop.
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 10:01 PM
|
#10
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613
Rep:
|
It's a capital I:
make bzImage
Cool
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 10:04 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 87
Original Poster
Rep:
|
oops! thanks MasterC
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 10:05 PM
|
#12
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Azmeen
ermm MasterC, the stock kernel shipped with Slack 9 is 2.4.20...
one, kernel compiling is not hard, if you know your hardware and specific features that you need (or want), then it shouldn't be too difficult.
DaOne's thread is informative, and you should give it a try if you insist on having the latest kernel
|
I don't see how that would really matter, or contridict anything I wrote? If you mean to say:
Quote:
Originally posted by Me
Not recompile, because this would indeed be the first time, so no 're' anything is being done
|
Constitutes a 'remcompile' because 2.4.21 is not the stock kernel in 9, well still he'd be compiling his first 2.4.22 kernel, still no recompiling (for the play on words anyway ).
But thanks for the info, I actually didn't know what the stock kernel was that shipped with 9.0 because Slack decided to disclude the source from the install CD
Cool
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 10:06 PM
|
#13
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by one
oops! thanks MasterC
|
You're welcome It's the little things that end up killing us sometimes...
Cool
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 11:20 PM
|
#14
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 87
Original Poster
Rep:
|
another question, when i compile my new kernel and want to remove it to continue with the old one, i just have to erase the /usr/src/linux directory of the new kernel?
|
|
|
09-01-2003, 12:41 AM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2003
Location: Malaysia
Distribution: Slackware, LFS, CentOS
Posts: 1,307
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by one
another question, when i compile my new kernel and want to remove it to continue with the old one, i just have to erase the /usr/src/linux directory of the new kernel?
|
Well, personally I do it the recommended way... ie. untar the kernel, and it will uncompress in linux-2.4.xx, I just create a linux symlink to the one I'm using/going to use... ie.:
cd /usr/src
ln -s linux-2.4.22 linux
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|