SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
from what i have heard, slackware was the one of the leading 'distro' in the past... (or was it the only distro???)
why did it not gather the same popularity that redhat enjoys today?
Location: Rome, Italy ; Novi Sad, Srbija; Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Ubuntu / ITOS2008
Posts: 1,207
Rep:
In my oppinion, slackware never became as popular as Mandy or RH because Slack is not user friendly like those distros and i never saw any ads (marketing) for slackware, while theres plenty of that for mandy, RH, and suse.
Just my oppinions...
I would have to agree, Slackware is not bloated, and it IS the most UNIX-like Linux OS out there. It is also the very first version on Linux I have ever used. I personally think Slackware is more user-friendly than some distros, because of the fact that it's easier to customize Slackware for your own personal needs, whereas RH and Mandrake aren't so easy to customize as far as security and so on. So in conclusion Slackware in my opinion is the best distro out there.
1) It teaches YOU Linux. There's no Linuxconf stuff around, only "vi" and your fingertips;
2) It's faster. What's behind the RH (and friends) init scripts showing "OK", "PASSED" and so? It's great for newbies, not for experienced users (I used RH for a long while in the past...);
3) It keeps your freedom. You can do whatever you want with your system. Other distros seen to be quite "tied";
4) It's pkg system forces you to understand what you really need to run. There's no unnecessary stuff installed to "satisfy dependencies"
5) It's made with LOVE. Patrick Volkerding and the Slackware staff aren't, surely, making lots of money with the distro. However, they have a life, and have to pay for food and stuff. Slack is also the only commercial (in the sense of a company behind) that offers free support even if you donwloaded an ISO image somewhere.
it may sound crazy but 4 me slackware is easier than redhat..
I tried to REconfigure an already installed version of redhat and I couldn't make any sense where the config files where..
In slackware I just now where everything is..
I had redhat a few years ago, and I learned nothing. you just put the cd in the CDROM press NEXT-> NEXT -> OK
and the installation is done.
Then you open linuxconfig and you do some configuration from there. BUT what does linuxconfig does ??
well I managed to learn in through slackware...which is more flexible, easy to configure, and according a latest review Salckware came out to be the most secure , buggy less , distro among many OSs..
I just can't stand all the windows like bull in most of the other distro`s.
Gui setup and config tools... I know what hardware I have, you don't have to tell me what i bought
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.