LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-28-2006, 11:35 AM   #1
Old_Fogie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,519

Rep: Reputation: 63
Since Mozilla Project Is Now Closed - Can I Un-Install It - Or Will That Mess Me Up?


Hi all,

Since you guys are probably aware, the Mozilla browser project is now ended and so Firefox will be the only maintained browser.

That said, it appears to me that many of the plug-ins, etc are shared throughout the Mozilla browser and firefox.

I don't use the mozilla broswer, just firefox, altho I'm thinking of switching to opera to be honest after I run a few more days on the beta version of it.

But I think? not sure that removing the mozilla may remove stuff I need for firefox.

Do you think it's ok to uninstall mozilla?

Last edited by Old_Fogie; 06-10-2006 at 01:58 AM.
 
Old 04-28-2006, 11:50 AM   #2
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8116Reputation: 8116Reputation: 8116Reputation: 8116Reputation: 8116Reputation: 8116Reputation: 8116Reputation: 8116Reputation: 8116Reputation: 8116Reputation: 8116
If you follow the Slackware changelog, you'll see that there is an update to the latest release of Mozilla available for installation.
After that, I suspect SeaMonkey (now in "testing") will replace Mozilla and will be available alongside FF/TB. So you wait until then and everything will be OK.
If you remove Mozilla now, you should expect certain applications to fail that rely on the mozilla-nss library. For instance, Gaim will complain that it is no longer able to setup encrypted (SSL) connections.
There are pointers in LQ on how to remove Mozilla and then configure your system so that the Firefox nss libraties are used instead.

Eric
 
Old 04-29-2006, 11:30 AM   #3
Old_Fogie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,519

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 63
thank you bob.

ok I'll leave it in and play it safe thank you.
 
Old 04-29-2006, 11:33 AM   #4
liquidtenmilion
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: South Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 606

Rep: Reputation: 32
Just keep it. The 32 megabytes(give or take) you save by removing it is not worth the trouble it may cause. If mozilla where a few hundred megabytes, then it would be different, but it's relatively small and chances are if freeing up 32 megs of space makes a difference, you need a new hard drive anyway.


Many plugins compile against mozilla, which is still using gecko 1.7, which means that when you remove mozilla some poorly designed plugins built against the libraries in mozilla 1.7 may not work anymore.
 
Old 04-29-2006, 12:00 PM   #5
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Rep: Reputation: 52
Yea, You'll want to keep it for nss and nspr libs. I build nss/nspr into a seperate package and then link firefox and thunderbird against that. This way, you have no need for Mozilla unless you actually use it. It would be nice to see Pat start using nss-3.x... I'm sure he will now that Mozilla is gone. That or he'll start using the libs from firefox. I assume the pre-built Firefox from mozilla.org/Slackware.com comes with nss/nspr? If not, he's going to have to start building it from source...
 
Old 04-29-2006, 01:50 PM   #6
dive
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,467

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
It probably would be better to have those libs as separate packages imo. Why on earth Gaim devs compiled against a web browser is beyond me.
 
Old 04-29-2006, 02:37 PM   #7
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Rep: Reputation: 52
Well, the real question is, why do OS devs force gaim to be linked against a web browser. I've never agreed with it either. That's why I use the stand alone nss-3.11 tarball for my nss/nspr libs. Then you have a small self-contained package of libs that sit in /usr/lib that programs can link against if they need it.
 
Old 04-30-2006, 05:08 PM   #8
Old_Fogie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,519

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 63
thank you guys for replying I really appreciate. OK i will definitely keep the mozilla in there then.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mess up audio using mozilla. xmms sounds perfect rwilcher Linux - General 1 04-11-2006 03:19 PM
LXer: Seamonkey Project to replace Mozilla Suite LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-12-2006 03:46 PM
LXer: SeaMonkey Project picks up where halted Mozilla Suite left off LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-12-2006 11:02 AM
New PPC install ... monitor mess. bcalder01 Debian 3 09-17-2005 07:19 PM
Display Driver Install Mess Up trager Linux - Newbie 6 12-06-2004 05:12 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration