SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I currently have NTFS partitions on my slackware file and print server. I can not use FAT32 format because I have files that are larger than 4 gig, so my issue is this. What format can I use that will give me read AND write access for windows PCs while not having to worry about the eventual fragmentation that is associated with NTFS?
If it is shared over Samba, the file format does not matter, if I remember correctly. Make it whatever Linux file system you want. I know that XFS has a file system reorganizer (i.e. defragmenter)....
Not sure what you mean.
If you are accessing the files from windows machine via samba, then the file system doesn't really matter as far as the clients are concerned. So you can use anything you like, ext3, xfs, jfs, etc.
Since you are using 'SAMBA' then the filesystem on the server is transparent to the client. So I would setup a ext3 or equivalent on the server. Now if you want to share R/W partitions then that's a different animal all together. You could always setup 'ntfs-3g' on your server for that then work via 'NFS' to the M$ systems.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blknite01minnesota
I currently have NTFS partitions on my slackware file and print server. I can not use FAT32 format because I have files that are larger than 4 gig, so my issue is this. What format can I use that will give me read AND write access for windows PCs while not having to worry about the eventual fragmentation that is associated with NTFS?
For read access over samba I know that format does not matter. But I would like to write on the hard drive from a Windows PC e.g. copy "file A" to the file server. I do not want to have to install ext3 support on every windows computer that needs to write. I already have samba set up to share with read and write access to NTFS formated hard drives, but I am worried about fragmentation on them and as I said I have .iso bigger than 4 gig so FAT32 is not an option. Is NTFS my only option?
For read access over samba I know that format does not matter. But I would like to write on the hard drive from a Windows PC e.g. copy "file A" to the file server. I do not want to have to install ext3 support on every windows computer that needs to write. I already have samba set up to share with read and write access to NTFS formated hard drives, but I am worried about fragmentation on them and as I said I have .iso bigger than 4 gig so FAT32 is not an option. Is NTFS my only option?
This is what we are telling you. Over SAMBA, the windows clients see the partitions shared over SAMBA as NTFS even though they might be ext3. It's transparent to the clients. I share a large ext3 partition via Samba as well as NFS so I can access what I need on that partition regardless of whether my laptop is running Windows XP or Slackware (my laptop tri-boots windows, slack 12.2, and current)
Personally, I have NEVER shared a drive that was formatted with NTFS over SAMBA or NFS and I would be very leery of doing so. My server shares are always formatted with a native *nix filesystem - usually ext3, but I have also used reiserfs.
The limitations you are describing are only in cases where you are sharing a partition on the same machine that boots both Windows and Linux and you want to share a partition between the 2 OS's on that one machine. It's not true in the case of a file server using SAMBA.
Ok I am currently going to experiment with it. But I think I had problems doing this before, could have been a bad install. On the plus side I did figure out how to mount, read, write and share NTFS under linux. I think thats a bit of an accomplishment. Thank you guys for the input will post my resaults.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.