LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-26-2017, 09:30 AM   #2866
gmgf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: Bergerac, France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,029

Rep: Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351

mpg123-1.25.7:

https://mpg123.org/
https://mpg123.org/download/mpg123-1.25.7.tar.bz2

lftp-4.8.2:

http://lftp.tech/news.html
http://lftp.yar.ru/ftp/lftp-4.8.2.tar.xz
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-26-2017, 06:28 PM   #2867
sanjioh
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
terminus font 4.46
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-26-2017, 10:00 PM   #2868
montagdude
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2016
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 677

Rep: Reputation: 502Reputation: 502Reputation: 502Reputation: 502Reputation: 502Reputation: 502
I don't want to come across as pushy or start a debate, but I also would like to make sure Pat knows I think we should have have Qt5 and Plasma 5 in the next release. In other words, if you are looking for a show of hands before doing that, mark me down as in favor.

Last edited by montagdude; 09-26-2017 at 10:06 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-27-2017, 02:37 AM   #2869
gmgf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: Bergerac, France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,029

Rep: Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by montagdude View Post
I don't want to come across as pushy or start a debate, but I also would like to make sure Pat knows I think we should have have Qt5 and Plasma 5 in the next release. In other words, if you are looking for a show of hands before doing that, mark me down as in favor.
I have already posted (maybe it's time to put qt5 in current, here)
 
Old 09-27-2017, 03:14 AM   #2870
gmgf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: Bergerac, France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,029

Rep: Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351
xfsprogs-4.3.1:

https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/uti...-4.13.1.tar.xz

openvpn-2.4.4:

https://community.openvpn.net/openvp...gesInOpenvpn24
https://swupdate.openvpn.org/communi...n-2.4.4.tar.xz
 
Old 09-27-2017, 09:13 AM   #2871
gmgf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: Bergerac, France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,029

Rep: Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351
dbus-1.10.24:

(dbus.expat222fix.diff.gz is applied in this new version)
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus/log/?h=dbus-1.10
https://dbus.freedesktop.org/release...1.10.24.tar.gz

Last edited by gmgf; 09-27-2017 at 09:18 AM.
 
Old 09-27-2017, 12:23 PM   #2872
atelszewski
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 796

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Hi,

Something to pay attention to.
What is /usr/bin/python going to point at in the next release?

--
Best regards,
Andrzej Telszewski
 
Old 09-27-2017, 12:45 PM   #2873
orbea
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 743

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Right now its pointing to python2.
Code:
$ ls -l /usr/bin/python
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Sep 23 19:14 /usr/bin/python -> python2.7
Its trivial for anyone that wants to use python3 to use the /usr/bin/python3 executable, but it would not be trivial to update all the build scripts accordingly if /usr/bin/python suddenly pointed to /usr/bin/python3. As long as python2 continues to be supported and widely used I think there is no harm in leaving it as is.
 
Old 09-27-2017, 12:46 PM   #2874
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-14.2 on Lenovo Thinkpad W520
Posts: 7,763

Rep: Reputation: 2691Reputation: 2691Reputation: 2691Reputation: 2691Reputation: 2691Reputation: 2691Reputation: 2691Reputation: 2691Reputation: 2691Reputation: 2691Reputation: 2691
Quote:
Originally Posted by atelszewski View Post
Hi,

Something to pay attention to.
What is /usr/bin/python going to point at in the next release?

--
Best regards,
Andrzej Telszewski
Here (Slint with Python3 from Salix added):
Code:
 didier[~]$ ls -l /usr/bin/python*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     9 sept. 23 15:30 /usr/bin/python -> python2.7
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    14 sept. 23 15:30 /usr/bin/python-config -> python2-config
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     9 sept. 23 15:30 /usr/bin/python2 -> python2.7
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    16 sept. 23 15:30 /usr/bin/python2-config -> python2.7-config
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  6184 sept. 21 21:28 /usr/bin/python2.7
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  1681 sept. 21 21:28 /usr/bin/python2.7-config
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     9 sept. 23 15:29 /usr/bin/python3 -> python3.5
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    16 sept. 23 15:29 /usr/bin/python3-config -> python3.5-config
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 10336 août  30 11:43 /usr/bin/python3.5
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    17 sept. 23 15:29 /usr/bin/python3.5-config -> python3.5m-config
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 10336 août  30 11:43 /usr/bin/python3.5m
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  3079 août  30 11:43 /usr/bin/python3.5m-config
So here /usr/bin/python => python2.

This being said I don't know if you will have something similar in Slackware-current, that I don't run at the moment.

You have to tell explicitly that you want the binary python3. As a reminder there are several ways to do that when building a package.

For instance for brltty: PYTHON=/usr/bin/python3 ./configure ...

But for pyatspi: ./configure --with-python=/usr/bin/python3 ...

EDIT orbea was faster...

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 09-27-2017 at 01:17 PM.
 
Old 09-27-2017, 02:17 PM   #2875
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,633

Rep: Reputation: 2955Reputation: 2955Reputation: 2955Reputation: 2955Reputation: 2955Reputation: 2955Reputation: 2955Reputation: 2955Reputation: 2955Reputation: 2955Reputation: 2955
Quote:
Originally Posted by orbea View Post
As long as python2 continues to be supported and widely used I think there is no harm in leaving it as is.
Python 2 EOLs in 2020, same year as Flash.

That should be an interesting year...
 
Old 09-27-2017, 02:40 PM   #2876
USUARIONUEVO
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 661

Rep: Reputation: 202Reputation: 202Reputation: 202
Arround qt5 and plasma5 , i read plasma project make end cycle to port pending qt4 apps to qt5 kf5 in the end of 2017

Then , probably is better start frameworks in december to no depending on a kde4/libs package for some apps.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-27-2017, 02:52 PM   #2877
USUARIONUEVO
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 661

Rep: Reputation: 202Reputation: 202Reputation: 202
If think in perl

5.26.1 , there is a CVE security issue

https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvenam...=CVE-2016-2381

and there is the patch
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/p...=packages/perl

Last edited by USUARIONUEVO; 09-27-2017 at 02:54 PM.
 
Old 09-27-2017, 04:59 PM   #2878
USUARIONUEVO
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 661

Rep: Reputation: 202Reputation: 202Reputation: 202
Cython-0.27
https://pypi.python.org/packages/94/...on-0.27.tar.gz
 
Old 09-27-2017, 05:05 PM   #2879
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 1,293

Rep: Reputation: 525Reputation: 525Reputation: 525Reputation: 525Reputation: 525Reputation: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by USUARIONUEVO View Post
Arround qt5 and plasma5 , i read plasma project make end cycle to port pending qt4 apps to qt5 kf5 in the end of 2017

Then , probably is better start frameworks in december to no depending on a kde4/libs package for some apps.
Code:
                                  ---> KDE Plasma 5 ---> ?
                                  |
                                  |
KDE -> KDE2 -> KDE3 -> KDE(SC)4 --|---> KDE Frameworks 5 ---> ?
                                  |
                                  |
                                  ---> KDE Apps ---> ?
How about NOPE?

I for one, I want to run Slackware, not Plasmaware!

Last edited by Darth Vader; 09-27-2017 at 05:08 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-27-2017, 06:02 PM   #2880
USUARIONUEVO
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 661

Rep: Reputation: 202Reputation: 202Reputation: 202
kde2 --> kde3 --> kde4 --> kde5

or kde4 no have separated libs package , apps package etc etc ?

return to kde1 if you want.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] how to show the current time at the top in the current shell Always ? rohitchauhan Linux - General 5 04-09-2014 04:05 PM
Slackware ARM (current) epic mistake: the current Android kernels are kicked out! Darth Vader Slackware 16 08-25-2013 05:36 PM
[SOLVED] setup fails on most current Slackware-current March 26, 2012 AlleyTrotter Slackware 15 04-09-2012 07:05 AM
Observation of Feb -current vs March -current Hangaber Slackware 14 03-12-2010 09:26 AM
cvs diff the most current and second last current version powah Linux - Software 1 03-30-2006 02:02 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration