SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
You are sounding like a scratched vinyl record. Remember the warning from the forum moderators: in the Slackware forum, starting another flamewar about systemd can cause your account to be locked.
As of the moment, the release notes haven't been posted.
This requires rust. I've been looking into rust, and have had some helpful emails with hints about how to proceed there. But I have to say that as much as it looks like using rust would be beneficial to Firefox security, it doesn't seem entirely ready for prime time. When a language that's written in itself can't compile itself without the use of a large bootstrapping compiler provided as binaries, there's work to be done.
There's also a new 52.1.0 ESR that I intended to put into -current until we know what to do about rust, but it doesn't compile. I'm looking into that, but won't let it block things.
I'll just say that I looked into rust before, spent sometime adding simple things like --docdir to their extremely convoluted build system (Unintentionally breaking the build for platforms I don't have in the process...) and then I tried cargo which immediately started to download a whole bootstrapping environment during configure... Suffice to say I dropped the idea quickly.
Looks like the compiz-reloaded team just pushed 0.8.14 releases for the entire set of compiz packages. It would be nice to see compiz dropped from the main tree and turned over to SBo so that it would be easier to keep all the packages together. If not then a nice alternative would be to see the 6 year old 0.8.8 release upgraded to the newest version. The compiz-reloaded project has been around for a while now and most distro repos are adopting their releases over the old now defunct compiz.org packages.
A few pages back I requested that freetype be updated to 2.7.1. The reason why I would like to see this is because the 2.7 branch of freetype now enables subpixel-hinting in the default build. This is particularly nice because the freetype slackbuild has a patch to enable subpixel-rendering and when freetype is rebuilt with subpixel-rendering and subpixel-hinting enabled you can get infinality level of rendering quality simply by symlinking the appropriate entries into your /etc/fonts/conf.d.
Right now current has freetype 2.6.5 which has support for subpixel-hinting, but it is disabled by default. I can see Pat sticking with 2.6.5 so that the sudden change in font rendering you would get with 2.7 won't bother people. However, if possible, it would be great to see a patch to enable subpixel-hinting in the slackbuild like there is for subpixel-rendering. That way for those of us who recompile freetype we can get both of those options enabled easily instead of having to edit the slackbuild with sed or a custom patch to enable subpixel-hinting.
Just a friendly reminder that /etc/ld.so.conf points to an inexistent directory on Slackware64. It points to /usr/x86_64-slackware-linux/lib/, but the a/binutils package creates a symlink of /usr/x86_64-slackware-linux/lib64/ (pointing to /usr/lib64/ldscripts/), following the ${LIBDIRSUFFIX} variable used in the etc.SlackBuild. The a/etc package creates ld.so.conf, and while I'm sure the etc.SlackBuild's sed line could be changed to keep the lib directory at the end (instead of lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}, it seems like the easier option would be to adjust binutils.SlackBuild to use the ${LIBDIRSUFFIX} variable when creating that symlink.
diff --git a/binutils.SlackBuild b/binutils.SlackBuild
index 41fa980..6d46e9b 100755
--- a/binutils.SlackBuild
+++ b/binutils.SlackBuild
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ make install DESTDIR=$PKG || exit 1
# Move ldscripts to /usr/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}, and then put symlinks in place
mv $PKG/usr/${TARGET}/lib/ldscripts $PKG/usr/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}
( cd $PKG/usr/${TARGET}
- ln -s /usr/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}/ldscripts lib/ldscripts
+ ln -s /usr/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}/ldscripts lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}/ldscripts
for FILE in ar as ld ld.bfd ld.gold nm objcopy objdump ranlib strip ; do
if [ -r "/usr/bin/$FILE" ]; then
rm -f bin/$FILE
As mentioned before, I doubt this is a big deal as it's just a symlink, and the linked directory is listed before this one in ld.so.conf, but it'd still probably be a good idea to have it point to the correct directories
A few pages back I requested that freetype be updated to 2.7.1. The reason why I would like to see this is because the 2.7 branch of freetype now enables subpixel-hinting in the default build. This is particularly nice because the freetype slackbuild has a patch to enable subpixel-rendering and when freetype is rebuilt with subpixel-rendering and subpixel-hinting enabled you can get infinality level of rendering quality simply by symlinking the appropriate entries into your /etc/fonts/conf.d.
Right now current has freetype 2.6.5 which has support for subpixel-hinting, but it is disabled by default. I can see Pat sticking with 2.6.5 so that the sudden change in font rendering you would get with 2.7 won't bother people. However, if possible, it would be great to see a patch to enable subpixel-hinting in the slackbuild like there is for subpixel-rendering. That way for those of us who recompile freetype we can get both of those options enabled easily instead of having to edit the slackbuild with sed or a custom patch to enable subpixel-hinting.
I thank you for this post; it got me to look into freetype's latest release, and came across the sed patch to enable subpixel hinting. I've got to admit that the fonts look ever so much better now. Thanks again!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.