SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Curious problem with the 4.9, 4.9.1 kernel, my computer do not stop and do not reboot.
no problem with all 4.8 series.
I'm running 4.9.1 on my laptop with no problems. You should open a new thread, and supply information about your hardware. It would also be useful to send the output of dmesg after booting for 4.8 and 4.9.1. Also post your kernel config.
The logical package management has several issues:
- The APIC ids provided by ACPI are not required to be the same as the
initial APIC id which can be retrieved by CPUID. The APIC ids provided
by ACPI are those which are written by the BIOS into the APIC. The
initial id is set by hardware and can not be changed. The hardware
provided ids contain the real hardware package information.
Especially AMD sets the effective APIC id different from the hardware id
as they need to reserve space for the IOAPIC ids starting at id 0.
As a consequence those machines trigger the currently active firmware
bug printouts in dmesg, These are obviously wrong.
- Virtual machines have their own interesting of enumerating APICs and
packages which are not reliably covered by the current implementation.
The sizing of the mapping array has been tweaked to be generously large to
handle systems which provide a wrong core count when HT is disabled so the
whole magic which checks for space in the physical hotplug case is not
needed anymore.
Simplify the whole machinery and do the mapping when the CPU starts and the
CPUID derived physical package information is available. This solves the
observed problems on AMD machines and works for the virtualization issues
as well.
Remove the extra call from XEN cpu bringup code as it is not longer
required.
Fixes: d49597fd3bc7 ("x86/cpu: Deal with broken firmware (VMWare/XEN)")
Reported-and-tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: M. Vefa Bicakci <m.v.b@runbox.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Charles (Chas) Williams <ciwillia@brocade.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB....260.3429@nanos
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Last edited by cwizardone; 01-09-2017 at 10:35 AM.
Distribution: Slint64-14.2.1.2 on Lenovo Thinkpad W520
Posts: 9,108
Rep:
Just a thought... as it is unlikely that every kernel release makes its way in -current, let alone every release candidate, maybe a dedicated thread for kernel releases testing would be relevant?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.