The Manjaro patch and kernel setting all fix upower-0.9.23, at least on my end anyway. I'll probably drop this into Slackworks for the time being unless/until it goes official.
Suspend works and Hibernate works, though I did have to add the resume=/dev/<swap_partition> to the boot loader command line for the kernel for pm-utils to work properly. I'll post my kernel config there too. |
Quote:
http://www.slackware.com/~rworkman/upower-0.99.3/ |
Robby, you might want to let Eric know Manjaro has some interesting KDE/Plasma5 patches especially for sddm which might promote some better compatibility in future releases.
|
Is there a possibility of including a 4.3 Kernel, maybe in testing? Slackware would have skylake compatibility (i'm getting a skylake laptop next month from work).
|
Robby, i have compiled all upower and xfce4, package, it seem all work correctly on xfce4,
in kde4, no suspend and hibernate in kde4 menu. upower seem to work in kde5 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
While you're at it, can you also tell ReaperX7 that I might take his posts more seriously if they contain more than just hot air, i.e. where are the pointers to those patches he is talking about? |
Eric, probably here:
https://github.com/manjaro/packages-openrc because these source are for openrc, and no for systemd. |
Quote:
Maybe next time I won't post a goddamned thing! |
Quote:
As he said in his post, he could only find one relavent patch that removed upower support. |
The link was already there from gmgf's post, just to a subdirectory for upower only. Why should I have to repost something if he can't search the archive himself and do a bit of legwork? Sorry, but I'm not one of those who hand-holds. And besides, if you see my OS posting icon, it was done on my phone so honestly...
|
On manjaro all patches are not applied it's like fedora patches,
you have to look in the 'PKGBUILD', too see those used ;) some patch are obsolet ;) |
On my machine Slackware64-current as of now doesn't boot in UEFI mode, only Legacy.
Am I alone? Also, I do not see the usefulness of the hardlinks /EFI/BOOT/{huge.s,initrd.img} as grub accepts paths to locations outside /EFI/BOOT and the paths in grub.cfg didn't change since 14.1 anyway. I am not saying that these hard links are harmful, just wondering. Anyway I will try removing them and see if that makes a difference. Just puzzled as that seems to be the only difference with 14.1 in the /EFI and /isolinux directories. EDIT: bad mkisofs command, sorry. Still, I will correct it and see what I get with vs without the hard links EDIT2: booting on UEFI mode works with and without the hard links, that are thus useless unless I miss something. |
Quote:
|
Let's stay on topic, please.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 AM. |