LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2006, 10:58 AM   #16
jimX86
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 268
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 79

Post #13 might be the most concise explanation of mounting flash drives that I've seen.

I remember seeing something about mounting flash drives with the noatime option in order to cut down on read/write cycles. Does anyone have any thoughts about whether that's really worthwhile?
 
Old 06-28-2006, 12:55 PM   #17
jimX86
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 268
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 79
I remembered where I read about noatime...
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6867

Using noatime is supposed to extend the life of the flash drive.
 
Old 06-28-2006, 03:48 PM   #18
cwwilson721
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: In my house.
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10 64bit, Slackware 13.1 64-bit
Posts: 2,649
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimX86
I remembered where I read about noatime...
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6867

Using noatime is supposed to extend the life of the flash drive.
It does that by cutting down on the number of writes to a flash device. Flash memory has a finite number of writes the it can do before it fails (I have no idea of the number. It will just up and quit on you one day. This is a PRIMARY reason you should not run an os from a flash device)
 
Old 06-28-2006, 04:52 PM   #19
jimX86
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 268
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 79
(I had a senior moment... knew it worked but couldn't remember why until I found the link back.)

The part that I think is nonintuitive is that with FAT there isn't even an atime stamp anyway. Linux knows it's supposed to do something, so it updates the single timestamp whenever it would normally update atime, mtime, or ctime... so the updates are redundant.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Removable NTFS drive Beresford Fedora 1 04-03-2006 07:05 AM
LXer: EDGE Tech Corp Announces Portable Flash Drive With Muscle - the New 8GB DiskGO!(TM) Now Available; Swap and Go With This Secure Thumb-Sized Flash Drive LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-14-2005 02:16 AM
Problems mounting/unmounting flash USB drive LordSurvivoR Linux - Hardware 1 07-12-2005 11:19 PM
Flash Drive Problems Garibaldi3489 Slackware 19 01-18-2005 09:11 AM
USB flash drive problems in FC3. mr_segfault Fedora 2 11-17-2004 01:51 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration