LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-01-2007, 10:56 AM   #16
rworkman
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Tuscaloosa, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,559

Rep: Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351

Quote:
Originally Posted by tubatodd View Post
Roll Tide Robbie!!!!! Next time there is an Alabama LUG meeting I should attend. Let me know.
The next meeting is an "informal" one - it will be at the TechMixer held on November 6th at Innovation Depot. See http://techmixer.org/ for details and such...

Unless something changes, I'll be there (even though it will require me to miss my favorite TV show) :/
 
Old 11-17-2007, 08:05 AM   #17
tubatodd
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 351

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I've been REALLY busy lately, so I haven't had a chance to install Slack 12. Yesterday I tried the latest release candidate (RC7) of Slax on my laptop. Low and behold, the problem appeared. I thought Slackware (or at least Slax) was immune. Any ideas what this problem might be??

To recap, I've experienced these lines in Ubuntu 7.10, Fedora 8 and Slax 6.0 RC7. I'm still trying to figure out what they all have in common.
 
Old 11-17-2007, 09:05 AM   #18
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Well, let's take this logically. It's obviously a video problem, so it could either be the video driver, xorg, or the card itself. I doubt it's the monitor, but I'm not sure it can be excluded.

I'm betting the driver is the problem. I too have experienced this before (with an ATI card, curse them !), and it was the driver.
 
Old 11-19-2007, 03:55 PM   #19
tubatodd
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 351

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
Well, let's take this logically. It's obviously a video problem, so it could either be the video driver, xorg, or the card itself. I doubt it's the monitor, but I'm not sure it can be excluded.

I'm betting the driver is the problem. I too have experienced this before (with an ATI card, curse them !), and it was the driver.
Not that I'm a Vulcan or anything (although there is a BIG statue of Vulcan here in Birmingham), but looking at it logically is the only way to go. I'm totally in agreement with you. I think it is pretty safe to rule out hardware because it is NEVER a problem with Ubuntu 7.04, Fedora 7, Slack 11, Slax 5.1.8, etc.

I REALLY want to believe it is the driver itself, BUT I've had the same thing happen using the i810 driver as well as the "intel" driver. I believe I heard that a new "intel" driver just came out. Perhaps that would fix it.
 
Old 11-20-2007, 02:16 AM   #20
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
If it's not the driver or the card, then it most likely is xorg. Maybe try a newer or earlier or patched version.
 
Old 11-20-2007, 07:11 AM   #21
tubatodd
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 351

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
If it's not the driver or the card, then it most likely is xorg. Maybe try a newer or earlier or patched version.
The Slax 6 RC7 CD I tried was using the new xorg-server 1.4. It too was having the problem. If you were to ask me what my gut feeling is...I would say it has to do with xrandr. I get COMPLETELY different detection settings between Ubuntu 7.04 and 7.10. That may be WAY off base, but it was an observation. Here is my xrandr from Ubuntu 7.04...

Code:
todd@todd-laptop:~$ xrandr
 SZ:    Pixels          Physical       Refresh
*0   1680 x 1050   ( 474mm x 301mm )  *60  
 1   1600 x 1200   ( 474mm x 301mm )   60  
 2   1400 x 1050   ( 474mm x 301mm )   60  
 3   1280 x 1024   ( 474mm x 301mm )   75  
 4   1440 x 900    ( 474mm x 301mm )   75   60  
 5   1280 x 960    ( 474mm x 301mm )   60  
 6   1360 x 765    ( 474mm x 301mm )   60  
 7   1152 x 864    ( 474mm x 301mm )   75  
 8   1024 x 768    ( 474mm x 301mm )   75   70   60  
 9    832 x 624    ( 474mm x 301mm )   75  
 10   800 x 600    ( 474mm x 301mm )   72   75   60   56  
 11   640 x 480    ( 474mm x 301mm )   75   73   67   60  
 12   720 x 400    ( 474mm x 301mm )   70  
 13  1680 x 1680   ( 474mm x 301mm )   60  
Current rotation - normal
Current reflection - none
Rotations possible - normal left inverted right 
Reflections possible - none
todd@todd-laptop:~$
The output I get from 7.10 shows information for the LCD built into the laptop and a TV outsetting. The information above looks correct. When the lid of my laptop is closed, the built-in LCD should be disabled and the external monitor should be the primary display. Something tells me the other stuff that I'm getting with the newer xrandr 1.2 is causing this problem.

Last edited by tubatodd; 11-20-2007 at 07:16 AM.
 
Old 11-20-2007, 07:42 AM   #22
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Did you try using these specs for distros in which it doesn't work properly ?

Quote:
*0 1680 x 1050 ( 474mm x 301mm ) *60
 
Old 11-20-2007, 11:14 AM   #23
tubatodd
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 351

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
Did you try using these specs for distros in which it doesn't work properly ?

Yes the other distros were all at 1680x1050. I can't swear that they were at 60Hz, but I'm pretty certain they were.
 
Old 11-20-2007, 12:39 PM   #24
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
And have you tried setting the display size ? (it's probably irrelevant, but who knows)

I have no other ideas other than, make sure the card is not overheating and the fan is free of dust.

Last edited by H_TeXMeX_H; 11-20-2007 at 12:41 PM.
 
Old 11-20-2007, 07:45 PM   #25
tubatodd
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 351

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
You may be on to something....

My gut feeling is that this is a new problem because of how xrandr is newly implemented. on Fedora 7 and Ubuntu 7.04 I get the following results...

Code:
todd@todd-laptop:~$ xrandr
 SZ:    Pixels          Physical       Refresh
*0   1680 x 1050   ( 474mm x 301mm )  *60  
 1   1600 x 1200   ( 474mm x 301mm )   60  
 2   1400 x 1050   ( 474mm x 301mm )   60  
 3   1280 x 1024   ( 474mm x 301mm )   75  
 4   1440 x 900    ( 474mm x 301mm )   75   60  
 5   1280 x 960    ( 474mm x 301mm )   60  
 6   1360 x 765    ( 474mm x 301mm )   60  
 7   1152 x 864    ( 474mm x 301mm )   75  
 8   1024 x 768    ( 474mm x 301mm )   75   70   60  
 9    832 x 624    ( 474mm x 301mm )   75  
 10   800 x 600    ( 474mm x 301mm )   72   75   60   56  
 11   640 x 480    ( 474mm x 301mm )   75   73   67   60  
 12   720 x 400    ( 474mm x 301mm )   70  
 13  1680 x 1680   ( 474mm x 301mm )   60  
Current rotation - normal
Current reflection - none
Rotations possible - normal left inverted right 
Reflections possible - none
todd@todd-laptop:~$
In Fedora 8 and Ubuntu 7.10 I get these results...

Code:
See "man sudo_root" for details.

ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1680 x 1050, maximum 1680 x 1680
VGA connected 1680x1050+0+0 (normal left inverted right) 474mm x 296mm
   1680x1050      60.0*+
   1400x1050      60.0  
   1440x900       59.9  
   1280x960       59.9  
   1360x765       59.8  
   1152x864       75.0     74.8  
   1024x768       75.1     70.1     60.0  
   832x624        74.6  
   800x600        72.2     75.0     60.3     56.2  
   640x480        75.0     72.8     66.7     60.0  
   720x400        70.1  
LVDS connected 1280x800+0+0 (normal left inverted right) 303mm x 190mm
   1280x800       60.0*+   60.0  
   1280x768       60.0  
   1024x768       60.0  
   800x600        60.3  
   640x480        59.9  
TV disconnected (normal left inverted right)
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$
Notice the 474mm x 301mm in the old dimensions and 474mm x 296mm in the old. Correct me if I'm wrong. but a 5mm difference is a big deal.
 
Old 11-21-2007, 04:12 AM   #26
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Ok, so try adding a Display Size to the monitor section:

Code:
Section "Monitor"
    Identifier     "Monitor0"
    VendorName     "Monitor Vendor"
    ModelName      "Monitor Model"
    DisplaySize     474  301
    HorizSync       29.000 - 65.000
    VertRefresh     60.000
    Option         "DPMS"
EndSection
Code:
DisplaySize  width height
              This optional entry gives the width and height, in  millimetres,
              of  the  picture  area  of the monitor. If given this is used to
              calculate the horizontal and vertical pitch (DPI) of the screen.
from: 'man xorg.conf'

Last edited by H_TeXMeX_H; 11-21-2007 at 04:14 AM.
 
Old 11-21-2007, 09:02 AM   #27
tubatodd
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 351

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
Ok, so try adding a Display Size to the monitor section:

Code:
Section "Monitor"
    Identifier     "Monitor0"
    VendorName     "Monitor Vendor"
    ModelName      "Monitor Model"
    DisplaySize     474  301
    HorizSync       29.000 - 65.000
    VertRefresh     60.000
    Option         "DPMS"
EndSection
Code:
DisplaySize  width height
              This optional entry gives the width and height, in  millimetres,
              of  the  picture  area  of the monitor. If given this is used to
              calculate the horizontal and vertical pitch (DPI) of the screen.
from: 'man xorg.conf'
I'm at work and thus, can not test this out. The only thing that makes me think this will NOT fix the problem is that I booted into Ubuntu 7.10 and the screen looked fine even though it had the "474x296" dimensions. I'm thinking that it is dumb luck that it worked at those dimensions. I mean...come on. How can the 2 versions be off by 5mm (about 1/4") and that not be a problem? So, I can't wait to try this out.


Thanks for you help. I'll let you know if that fixes it.

Last edited by tubatodd; 11-21-2007 at 09:04 AM.
 
Old 11-21-2007, 05:58 PM   #28
tubatodd
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 351

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I added the DisplaySize entry and it had no effect. xrandr had the same exact output of 474x301. I tried setting through
Code:
xrandr --fbmm 474x301
but it had no effect. I feel like I'm on the right track, but I'm stuck.
 
Old 11-22-2007, 05:03 AM   #29
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Can you post your '/var/log/Xorg.0.log' ? There may be more clues in there. Maybe compare them for when it works and when it doesn't.
 
Old 11-22-2007, 08:34 PM   #30
tubatodd
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Birmingham, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 351

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Apparently my xorg.0.log file is too long for me to post to this forum. So, here is a link to my post in the Ubuntu forum where I posted this file.

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=585722
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
multiple horizontal lines crossing screen when I startx lobo78 Linux - Newbie 4 12-09-2007 10:54 PM
Splitting horizontal to verical...lines venki Linux - General 7 07-04-2007 10:24 AM
Faint horizontal rolling lines sleepindawg Mandriva 2 07-05-2004 12:51 AM
horizontal lines on screen? svar Linux - General 8 07-12-2003 10:53 AM
Roving horizontal lines thomask Linux - Hardware 0 07-11-2003 03:41 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration