SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Roll Tide Robbie!!!!! Next time there is an Alabama LUG meeting I should attend. Let me know.
The next meeting is an "informal" one - it will be at the TechMixer held on November 6th at Innovation Depot. See http://techmixer.org/ for details and such...
Unless something changes, I'll be there (even though it will require me to miss my favorite TV show) :/
I've been REALLY busy lately, so I haven't had a chance to install Slack 12. Yesterday I tried the latest release candidate (RC7) of Slax on my laptop. Low and behold, the problem appeared. I thought Slackware (or at least Slax) was immune. Any ideas what this problem might be??
To recap, I've experienced these lines in Ubuntu 7.10, Fedora 8 and Slax 6.0 RC7. I'm still trying to figure out what they all have in common.
Well, let's take this logically. It's obviously a video problem, so it could either be the video driver, xorg, or the card itself. I doubt it's the monitor, but I'm not sure it can be excluded.
I'm betting the driver is the problem. I too have experienced this before (with an ATI card, curse them !), and it was the driver.
Well, let's take this logically. It's obviously a video problem, so it could either be the video driver, xorg, or the card itself. I doubt it's the monitor, but I'm not sure it can be excluded.
I'm betting the driver is the problem. I too have experienced this before (with an ATI card, curse them !), and it was the driver.
Not that I'm a Vulcan or anything (although there is a BIG statue of Vulcan here in Birmingham), but looking at it logically is the only way to go. I'm totally in agreement with you. I think it is pretty safe to rule out hardware because it is NEVER a problem with Ubuntu 7.04, Fedora 7, Slack 11, Slax 5.1.8, etc.
I REALLY want to believe it is the driver itself, BUT I've had the same thing happen using the i810 driver as well as the "intel" driver. I believe I heard that a new "intel" driver just came out. Perhaps that would fix it.
If it's not the driver or the card, then it most likely is xorg. Maybe try a newer or earlier or patched version.
The Slax 6 RC7 CD I tried was using the new xorg-server 1.4. It too was having the problem. If you were to ask me what my gut feeling is...I would say it has to do with xrandr. I get COMPLETELY different detection settings between Ubuntu 7.04 and 7.10. That may be WAY off base, but it was an observation. Here is my xrandr from Ubuntu 7.04...
Code:
todd@todd-laptop:~$ xrandr
SZ: Pixels Physical Refresh
*0 1680 x 1050 ( 474mm x 301mm ) *60
1 1600 x 1200 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 60
2 1400 x 1050 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 60
3 1280 x 1024 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 75
4 1440 x 900 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 75 60
5 1280 x 960 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 60
6 1360 x 765 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 60
7 1152 x 864 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 75
8 1024 x 768 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 75 70 60
9 832 x 624 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 75
10 800 x 600 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 72 75 60 56
11 640 x 480 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 75 73 67 60
12 720 x 400 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 70
13 1680 x 1680 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 60
Current rotation - normal
Current reflection - none
Rotations possible - normal left inverted right
Reflections possible - none
todd@todd-laptop:~$
The output I get from 7.10 shows information for the LCD built into the laptop and a TV outsetting. The information above looks correct. When the lid of my laptop is closed, the built-in LCD should be disabled and the external monitor should be the primary display. Something tells me the other stuff that I'm getting with the newer xrandr 1.2 is causing this problem.
My gut feeling is that this is a new problem because of how xrandr is newly implemented. on Fedora 7 and Ubuntu 7.04 I get the following results...
Code:
todd@todd-laptop:~$ xrandr
SZ: Pixels Physical Refresh
*0 1680 x 1050 ( 474mm x 301mm ) *60
1 1600 x 1200 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 60
2 1400 x 1050 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 60
3 1280 x 1024 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 75
4 1440 x 900 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 75 60
5 1280 x 960 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 60
6 1360 x 765 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 60
7 1152 x 864 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 75
8 1024 x 768 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 75 70 60
9 832 x 624 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 75
10 800 x 600 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 72 75 60 56
11 640 x 480 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 75 73 67 60
12 720 x 400 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 70
13 1680 x 1680 ( 474mm x 301mm ) 60
Current rotation - normal
Current reflection - none
Rotations possible - normal left inverted right
Reflections possible - none
todd@todd-laptop:~$
In Fedora 8 and Ubuntu 7.10 I get these results...
Code:
See "man sudo_root" for details.
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1680 x 1050, maximum 1680 x 1680
VGA connected 1680x1050+0+0 (normal left inverted right) 474mm x 296mm
1680x1050 60.0*+
1400x1050 60.0
1440x900 59.9
1280x960 59.9
1360x765 59.8
1152x864 75.0 74.8
1024x768 75.1 70.1 60.0
832x624 74.6
800x600 72.2 75.0 60.3 56.2
640x480 75.0 72.8 66.7 60.0
720x400 70.1
LVDS connected 1280x800+0+0 (normal left inverted right) 303mm x 190mm
1280x800 60.0*+ 60.0
1280x768 60.0
1024x768 60.0
800x600 60.3
640x480 59.9
TV disconnected (normal left inverted right)
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$
Notice the 474mm x 301mm in the old dimensions and 474mm x 296mm in the old. Correct me if I'm wrong. but a 5mm difference is a big deal.
DisplaySize width height
This optional entry gives the width and height, in millimetres,
of the picture area of the monitor. If given this is used to
calculate the horizontal and vertical pitch (DPI) of the screen.
from: 'man xorg.conf'
Last edited by H_TeXMeX_H; 11-21-2007 at 04:14 AM.
DisplaySize width height
This optional entry gives the width and height, in millimetres,
of the picture area of the monitor. If given this is used to
calculate the horizontal and vertical pitch (DPI) of the screen.
from: 'man xorg.conf'
I'm at work and thus, can not test this out. The only thing that makes me think this will NOT fix the problem is that I booted into Ubuntu 7.10 and the screen looked fine even though it had the "474x296" dimensions. I'm thinking that it is dumb luck that it worked at those dimensions. I mean...come on. How can the 2 versions be off by 5mm (about 1/4") and that not be a problem? So, I can't wait to try this out.
Thanks for you help. I'll let you know if that fixes it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.