LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-07-2006, 11:49 PM   #1
Old_Fogie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,519

Rep: Reputation: 62
Question about some packages in extra


What is the reason that slackware includes php 4 in the installer and not 5. Do I need to put 5 in? I dont write any web pages, or host anything, is this just in case I am a programmer? This really just came to my attention due to the security update, and figured I should get my brain straight on this now

The udev alternate's, how come these are included too. Is it in case a computer may not work well with the udev included in Slack11 default installer, and maybe these will?

Thank you in advance.
 
Old 11-08-2006, 02:51 AM   #2
cwwilson721
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: In my house.
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10 64bit, Slackware 13.1 64-bit
Posts: 2,649
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 66
AFAIK, php5 is not required for you,fogie. It's an extension to Apache for serving up webpages. Unless you have an app you want to install the absolutely requires it, I wouldn't install 5. (Why mess with something that works?)
 
Old 11-08-2006, 03:18 AM   #3
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,505

Rep: Reputation: 7890Reputation: 7890Reputation: 7890Reputation: 7890Reputation: 7890Reputation: 7890Reputation: 7890Reputation: 7890Reputation: 7890Reputation: 7890Reputation: 7890
PHP5 - you don't need it, only PHP applications might need it. Same goes for a lot of other software in Slackware. Apache - there is Apache 2.x for years now, and Slackware still uses the (still actively maintained) 1.3.x version. If your web applications don't require it, there is no need for the upgrade. Hey! THe Linux 2.4 kernel is not the latest and greatest, and no-one is required to upgrade to 2.6 (again, unless there is some reason for it, such as hardware support)

The important point is that the software is still being maintained, and bugs are squashed as they are found.

The old UDEV is there so that people with 2.4 kernels can still have a working udev implementation.

Eric
 
Old 11-08-2006, 04:00 AM   #4
Old_Fogie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,519

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 62
Oh ok thank you gent's for the help.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to install extra packages??? Da_riPPer Linux - Newbie 1 08-11-2005 03:54 PM
Remove Extra Packages nistelrooy Debian 4 06-18-2005 10:45 AM
using yum for extra packages beowulf405 Fedora 1 06-21-2004 11:40 PM
a question about packages veritas Slackware 2 03-07-2004 10:04 PM
extra hard disc's - idiot question! bigjohn Linux - Newbie 14 03-10-2003 10:17 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration