LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-15-2012, 05:22 AM   #61
y0g1
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: 16

In next Slackware version I would like to see:
- texlive (to get png transparent in pdflatex)
- more gst-plugins (bad, base, good, ugly, gst-ffmpeg)
- gimp-2.8
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 04-15-2012, 06:43 AM   #62
smoooth103
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: NC, USA
Distribution: Slackware (64 bit)
Posts: 242

Rep: Reputation: 62
sbopkg
 
Old 04-16-2012, 02:20 PM   #63
unclejed613
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 352

Rep: Reputation: 32
i agree. sbopkg would be good, at least in /extra, if not in the main tree...
 
Old 05-17-2012, 07:32 AM   #64
y0g1
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: 16
openssl could be updated to 1.0 version.
 
Old 05-20-2012, 12:35 AM   #65
foodown
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 611

Rep: Reputation: 221Reputation: 221Reputation: 221
Wireshark
 
Old 05-20-2012, 12:47 PM   #66
Lockywolf
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 683

Rep: Reputation: 253Reputation: 253Reputation: 253
Hmm...

New XFCE, most definitely.

OpenLDAP Server. YP should really go to hell...
Working with Openldap... PAM. Lucking fife.
Working with openldap without PAM is just too painful.

MIT-Kerberos

Hostapd. Yes, I can fetch it from SBo, but really, such a thing should be in the distribution.

ConnMan. WICD is just too obsolete.

texlive. yes, tetex is just too old.

In the world of wishes - eventually I would like to have E17. Very beautiful, full-featured, windows-hostile.
 
Old 05-20-2012, 05:21 PM   #67
ttk
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2012
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 1,038
Blog Entries: 27

Rep: Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484
Of two minds about this

On one hand, the reason I love Slackware is its stability, and Slackware is as stable as it is because it has relatively few "official" packages, which Patrick + friends test fairly exhaustively.

The work involved in exhaustively testing a set of packages for mutual incompatibility is approximately proportionate to the *square* of the number of packages tested (actually less, because some packages are obviously not dependent, like xpdf and jove). (Three packages, A, B and C, require testing for interactions AB, BC, and AC, while four packages W, X, Y, and Z require testing for interactions WX, WY, WZ, XY, XZ, and YZ -- twice as many potential sources of incompatability.)

I actually wouldn't mind if Slackware releases got *more* QA testing, because problems do occasionally creep in there (like CUPS's problems in 13.1, or the installer's USB woes in 13.37), so keeping the number of packages small is a good thing.

The Solution is, as others have already pointed out, for users to contribute to Slackbuilds. Slackware could perhaps mention the existence of Slackbuilds in the installation tool, so more users could take advantage of it, and I wouldn't mind sbopkg getting included in /extras so pulling in everything else is trivial, but aside from that PV has quite enough on his plate.

On the other hand, I've often wished Slackware had better support for "enterprisey" type environments, like Turbo Linux did in its prime. The text installer is wonderful, and I miss it when having to deal with other distributions' installers, but it doesn't really cut it when one needs to install hundreds of servers at a time.

A project I've been sizing up for a while is writing a "cluster linux" slackbuild which converted a standard Slackware install into the "master" node of a TurboLinux-style cluster. It would set up zeroconf, ftp, and dhcpd for PXE-install, and create a local Slackware and Slackbuilds repository for the new nodes.

Additional nodes would PXE-install from the master node, and that install would include the "cluster linux" package, and some additional packages for compute and storage clusters: some additional perl and python modules, zeromq, openstack, hadoop, pig, sawzall, mffirewall, nagios/nagiosgraph (and appropriate plugins for monitoring server health: temperature, disk errors, load avg, etc), mrtg, rrdtool, puppet, and squid.

The onus would be on the package developer(s) to make sure these Slackbuild packages were all trouble-free, of course, leaving it to PV to focus on Slackware's base packages and making those bulletproof for all Slackware users (which he does magnificantly).

Every time I start this project, however, my other projects-in-progress grow little appendages and point at me, laughing. :-) Someday!
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-21-2012, 10:56 AM   #68
cod_liver_0il
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2012
Location: India
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD
Posts: 48

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Sbopkg
NetworkManager (if not, wvdial)
Vlc
 
Old 05-21-2012, 12:47 PM   #69
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,080

Rep: Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255
Quote:
Originally Posted by cod_liver_0il View Post
Sbopkg
NetworkManager (if not, wvdial)
Vlc
NetworkManager is now included as part of the KDE installation (current).
VLC would be nice and drop whatever Koffice is called now and add LibreOffice.

Last edited by cwizardone; 05-21-2012 at 12:54 PM.
 
Old 05-21-2012, 04:03 PM   #70
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,557

Rep: Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761
Koffice is now Calligra. I must admit I don't use it myself but people who do have told me it has started to become really nice. So personally I would prefer not drop it. Though I am also in favour of adding LibreOffice.
 
Old 05-21-2012, 09:54 PM   #71
ReaperX7
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,558
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097
Slackware is fine as it is. Honestly, the only things that SHOULD ever be added are those things necessary for the function of existing programs already in the tree, like llvm was added to support the Gallium3D drivers in Mesa. No other extras are needed unless those extras are for expanded minimals to existing tools like Bash Completion is to Bash.

Also, functionality of packages in extras needs to be taken into accountability as well. Chromium, as someone suggested is a nice idea, but Chromium doesn't have many of the same features as Google Chrome does. To take out Chrome and replace it with it's open source sister project sounds nice, but you have to think about what is useful in a mainstream setting, not just private settings. Other projects from SlackBuilds that are problematic with compiles are the problems of the SlackBuild maintainers, not Slackware itself.

As far as LibreOffice goes, I'd actually say that I'd feel better with LibreOffice added, but ONLY if we could remove something like KOffice (or KDE and move it into SlackBuilds like Gnome was and use XFCE as the default UI of Slackware).

Slackware is a growing and ever improving project but it's already reaching the size of Dual-Layer DVDs. It really shouldn't be this big.

Last edited by ReaperX7; 05-21-2012 at 09:57 PM.
 
Old 05-21-2012, 11:21 PM   #72
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,080

Rep: Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255Reputation: 7255
ReaperX7,
Well said.
 
Old 05-22-2012, 12:46 AM   #73
Lockywolf
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 683

Rep: Reputation: 253Reputation: 253Reputation: 253
Quote:
we could remove something like KOffice (or KDE
Yes, Yes, Yes!

Get rid of KDE. IMO, some time ago KDE got completely unusable.
Not mentioning just being very heavy.
 
Old 05-22-2012, 12:48 AM   #74
bosth
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2011
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 304

Rep: Reputation: 127Reputation: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lockywolf View Post
Get rid of KDE. IMO, some time ago KDE got completely unusable.
Not mentioning just being very heavy.
As long as Pat and AlienBob are KDE users, I doubt that you'll see KDE removed from Slackware.
 
Old 05-22-2012, 03:36 AM   #75
chrisretusn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 2,967

Rep: Reputation: 1545Reputation: 1545Reputation: 1545Reputation: 1545Reputation: 1545Reputation: 1545Reputation: 1545Reputation: 1545Reputation: 1545Reputation: 1545Reputation: 1545
You know, when GNOME was dropped, I was highly disappointed, so much so that I temporarily quit Slackware. I say temporary because I was back with Slackware in less that six months. I got to like KDE (using AlienBob's Ktown right now in fact), KDE is really coming around and getting better with each update. That is my humble a??'d opinion anyway. I like XFCE too, except for one small detail, which has finally be fixed after all these years. So I may give it a shot, but alas I have grown quite used to KDE now so perhaps not.

My point is the desktop is not what makes Slackware, it's what is under the hood that makes Slackware. The desktop is just icing on the Slackware cake.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
slackbuild textlive on slackware 13 missing texmf tree balamkej Slackware 4 01-21-2010 03:19 PM
A script that could mirror slackware tree from multiple servers grissiom Slackware 8 11-21-2009 07:05 PM
suggestions on family tree programs and..... Chris106 Linux - General 2 10-22-2008 07:54 AM
Linux Family Tree -- Where Slackware Fits unixfool Slackware 16 04-23-2008 11:47 PM
Slackware 9.1 tree/slapt-get question 187807 Slackware 3 02-20-2004 06:36 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration