LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-04-2005, 04:23 PM   #1
AJ_Cantos
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Spain
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: 15
Probably an Stupid question...


If Slackware has kernel 2.6 available, why does it install 2.4 by default?

Thanx.
 
Old 05-04-2005, 04:35 PM   #2
killerbob
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 662

Rep: Reputation: 31
backwards compatibility


and there's no such thing as a stupid question.
 
Old 05-04-2005, 04:39 PM   #3
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475Reputation: 475
Mainly because Patrick is more concerned with Slackware being stable than current. 2.4.29 is perfectly ok for the majority of systems, bugs have been worked out and it's unlikely to crash your system.
 
Old 05-04-2005, 05:16 PM   #4
xushi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,288

Rep: Reputation: 45
Not to forget 2.4.30 as well.

the 2.6 series seems very stable nowadays. But that's just me with 1 laptop.. I think now its just a matter of Pat testing it on different types of machines, and finding the best default settings to put before releasing it with 11, or 11.1 maby.

Nevertheless, it's not that difficult to compile your own 2.6, and the knowledge and advantage you get afterwards is worth it. I think the more you use Slack, the more you get accustomed to true Linux, and take certain matters with your own hands.
 
Old 05-05-2005, 12:12 PM   #5
AJ_Cantos
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Spain
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 26

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
so...

would it be a good idea to install 2.6 in spite of 2.4?

what advantages will I get?

is it really less stable?


Thanks a lot.
 
Old 05-05-2005, 12:59 PM   #6
killerbob
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 662

Rep: Reputation: 31
In my experience, it's not any less stable, no. I find that the improved USB support, as well as improved support for other hardware that I've got in my system (wireless LAN, burner, etc.) far outweighs any disadvantage. Not that there are any, really. The newer kernel is bulkier, and a whole lot slower on ancient hardware, is all.
 
Old 05-05-2005, 03:24 PM   #7
Jeebizz
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware15.0 64-Bit Desktop, Debian 11 non-free Toshiba Satellite Notebook
Posts: 4,169

Rep: Reputation: 1373Reputation: 1373Reputation: 1373Reputation: 1373Reputation: 1373Reputation: 1373Reputation: 1373Reputation: 1373Reputation: 1373Reputation: 1373
I like 2.6, mainly for the fact that when I recompile, my sound still works, under 2.4 I would always lose the functionality of sound, even when I have made sure to include support for my chipset and enabled sound support, and so I gave up with recompiling 2.4, although I haven't completely migrated to 2.6, I still keep 2.4 and switch between them frequently. I am waiting and hoping the next major release of Slackware (11) will have moved on to the 2.6 series
 
Old 05-06-2005, 05:46 AM   #8
PDock
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Distribution: Slack10 & curr. tried numerous
Posts: 189

Rep: Reputation: 37
Only problem I've had with 2.6 kernel is on a laptop with older style (16) pcmcia cards. If the card is in at boot, it gets set up correctly but can't be removed and reinserted. /etc/rc.d/rc.pcmcia restart does not fix the problem either. Seems pccardd and cardmanager do not play nice. Easier to leave the laptop at 2.4 while pcmcia-cs is migrated to the 2.6 kernel.
 
Old 05-06-2005, 04:37 PM   #9
killerbob
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 662

Rep: Reputation: 31
I've had that problem with mine, PDock, but I usually fix it by using cardctl commands. cardctl eject, then cardctl insert. If the card doesn't detect properly after doing that, then I run /etc/rc.d/rc.hotplug restart which almost always fixes it.
 
Old 05-06-2005, 08:27 PM   #10
masonm
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,300

Rep: Reputation: 90
If all of your hardware works with no problem using the 2.4 kernel there is no advantage to using a 2.6 kernel. As the newer kernel is larger, you will actually just use up some memory for nothing.

If you have hardware that would benefit from the newer kernel then it's worth it. I run both. Most of the time I use the 2.4.29 and save memory, and when I want to use my usb cdburner or other newer usb devices, I switch to the newer 2.6.11 kernel.
 
Old 05-06-2005, 10:01 PM   #11
eelriver
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: san francisco
Distribution: Slackware 10.2 kernel 2.6.13, Gentoo amd64, Some mish-mash of programs that started with slack 9.0
Posts: 165

Rep: Reputation: 30
I use a lot of newer hardware myself that the 2.6 kernel has better support for. I use it both on a laptop and a workstation and have never had a problem with stabiility.
If there's any crashing going on it's almost always my fault.
The kernel is much more stable then the user (me).
 
Old 05-07-2005, 08:11 AM   #12
tyg
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 34

Rep: Reputation: 15
Sometimes it's hard to get the sound working again...
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid, stupid question; I lost Klaptop. :( Surfrider Slackware 2 08-31-2005 09:12 PM
probably a stupid question mrchaos Slackware 11 04-22-2005 05:59 PM
Stupid Dumb Stupid Question... drigz Linux - Software 3 09-23-2004 03:09 PM
stupid question amadkow General 6 05-28-2004 07:11 PM
stupid question but karlos007 Linux - Newbie 1 05-11-2004 04:26 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration