LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Slackware (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/)
-   -   Post something that you do not like about slackware (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/post-something-that-you-do-not-like-about-slackware-790364/)

Didier Spaier 06-15-2010 04:18 AM

@H_TeXMeX_H: Seems like a "dialogue de sourds" as we say in French. OK, let's say it's my fault as I speak and write English poorly. Case closed on my side.

onebuck 06-15-2010 07:31 AM

What I like about Slackware!
 
Hi,

I'm going to flip this as a lot of users seem to miss a lot by not reading the great documentation that is provided for the Slackware install. If everyone would follow the lead from the docs then a lot of problems would be alleviated. Most of the problems that I notice here on LQ would be not sticking their heads up if the OP had just read a doc such as: 'CHANGES_AND_HINTS.TXT' or associative text files.

Another big problem is that most users default to the huge kernel when PV & Team suggestion is to use the generic kernel for daily use with a initrd. Which if the user reads the suggested file '/boot/README.initrd' to know how to implement thus having a bootable system. I could continue with examples but it would be better for everyone that is interested to peruse the Slackware Forum.

I do like the idea or philosophy behind Slackware of open information and functionality! Not hidden nor is it difficult to learn how things are implemented. OPEN!

My point is 'RTFM' or 'RTFD' that are available to assist in the Slackware venture to hopefully have a working Slackware system without too much effort. But when you have a problem then be sure to post it with relative information to the Slackware Forum.

So I guess that my 'something that you do not like about slackware' is that a lot of new users don't prepare themselves for a new install. There are responsibilities on everyone to know what's necessary to have a good functioning system. Again 'I don't wanna hold your hand'... What's the next chord or is that chorus? I gotta read the sheet when I can find it!

:hattip:

SpelledJ 06-15-2010 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tallship (Post 4003921)
So you would have a -generic-xfs, a -generic-ext2, a -generic-reiserfs, etc., right?

But I often use an ext2 /boot and the rest as xfs - it was bad enough when I had to load support for xfs from a floppy.

Dude, that's going backwards. Really.

Sigh. No, one -generic, one default filesystem. Not using the default filesystem? Build an initrd, exactly like you have to now. Using more than one filesystem? Build an initrd, exactly like you have to now.

Don't care to get fancy with the filesystems? One filesystem for everything fine? Then you wouldn't have to fool with mkinitrd.

2handband 06-15-2010 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevmccor (Post 3997737)
I have used Slackware for quite a while. Obviously, I like it. There are some occasional annoyances. Right now, my /tmp directory is full of cr*p and I can't find anything other than $rm -rf /tmp/* to deal with it. I guess my continuing complaint is packages accumulating in /tmp. Perhaps SBo could designate some environment variable such as SB0-TMP="~/.tmp" to make it easier for users to keep package collections/history together more easily.

I did find this:

http://packetstormsecurity.nl/linux/...min-FAQ-6.html

Any thoughts on a good script to clean up the /tmp directory?

Thanks

Add the following line to /etc/rc.d/rc.6:

Code:

rm -rf /tmp/*
Make sure you put it in before the filesystem unmounts. Works for me.

As for whoever was complaining about Nvidia drivers, the packages at Slackbuilds.org work fine. I installed Slackware for the very first time early last week and had 3D acceleration working within 30 minutes of booting up.

Complaints about Slackware? I have one. I don't like the full install. Yes, I know, disc space is cheap and I have a lot of it... but I like simple, clean menus that aren't chock-full of applications I don't use.
Other than that i think Slack is pretty much flawless... and I've only been using it for a little over a week.

onebuck 06-15-2010 08:33 AM

Hi,

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2handband (Post 4004218)
<snip>

Complaints about Slackware? I have one. I don't like the full install. Yes, I know, disc space is cheap and I have a lot of it... but I like simple, clean menus that aren't chock-full of applications I don't use.
Other than that i think Slack is pretty much flawless... and I've only been using it for a little over a week.

You have the option to tag it. Or do a minimal and add to suit your install. I agree that a full install may cause the lose of time but a recommended install type for a new user. Plus the Slackware distribution is used world wide to multiple user types. So some people wants are totally different than others. I think PV & Team do a wonderful balanced install and a good methodology to allow user selections.

:hattip:

hitest 06-15-2010 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2handband (Post 4004218)
Complaints about Slackware? I have one. I don't like the full install. Yes, I know, disc space is cheap and I have a lot of it... but I like simple, clean menus that aren't chock-full of applications I don't use.
Other than that i think Slack is pretty much flawless... and I've only been using it for a little over a week.

Welcome to our forum! :)
I'm happy to hear you like Slackware. I was a Debian user before (nice distro). Now that Slackware is up and running you could use pkgtool to remove the applications that you never use.

# pkgtool

linus72 06-15-2010 08:40 AM

2handband;
there are so many options with Slackware, the most simplistic (perfect) distro ever.
Tagfiles

thats the key to any minimal reproducable slack install
tagfiles

http://www.bilbos-stekkie.com/tagger/tagfiles.html

http://www.flaterco.com/kb/slackware.html

http://www.slackbook.org/html/packag...-tagfiles.html

http://chelskov.org/node/4

http://connie.slackware.com/~alien/tools/tagfiles/

http://mysticalgr.awardspace.com/?p=353&page=2

EDIT: LOL why did it doublepost?

linus72 06-15-2010 08:40 AM

2handband;
there are so many options with Slackware, the most simplistic (perfect) distro ever.
Tagfiles

thats the key to any minimal reproducable slack install
tagfiles

http://www.bilbos-stekkie.com/tagger/tagfiles.html

http://www.flaterco.com/kb/slackware.html

http://www.slackbook.org/html/packag...-tagfiles.html

http://chelskov.org/node/4

http://connie.slackware.com/~alien/tools/tagfiles/

http://mysticalgr.awardspace.com/?p=353&page=2

2handband 06-15-2010 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hitest (Post 4004232)
Welcome to our forum! :)
I'm happy to hear you like Slackware. I was a Debian user before (nice distro). Now that Slackware is up and running you could use pkgtool to remove the applications that you never use.

# pkgtool

That's what I've been doing. Next time I do a Slackware install (I'm going to slowly migrate the rest of the computers in the house from Debian to Slack) I'll cherry-pick through the packages... I had no idea it was going to install so much stuff. I've got this one cleaned out pretty good at this point; I've probably got some orphaned libraries lying around but whatever. Glad to be here!

Richard Cranium 06-15-2010 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpelledJ (Post 4004196)
Sigh. No, one -generic, one default filesystem. Not using the default filesystem? Build an initrd, exactly like you have to now. Using more than one filesystem? Build an initrd, exactly like you have to now.

Don't care to get fancy with the filesystems? One filesystem for everything fine? Then you wouldn't have to fool with mkinitrd.

Actually, the installer already should know what filesystems you intend to use for your partitions. It asks you fairly early in the process.

How many disk drive controllers are you going to build into the generic image? The installer doesn't know about that.

I think you'll end up with what we already have: a kernel with everything in it so that you can do an initial install and a generic kernel with the bare minimum to boot with which you use an initrd.

Unless someone can write a script that would troll through /sys to figure out what minimum set of modules should be loaded by initrd to allow you to boot into runlevel 3.

Alien Bob 06-15-2010 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Cranium (Post 4004281)
Unless someone can write a script that would troll through /sys to figure out what minimum set of modules should be loaded by initrd to allow you to boot into runlevel 3.

The script /usr/share/mkinitrd/mkinitrd_command_generator.sh does just that.

Eric

mlangdn 06-15-2010 11:00 AM

I use the huge kernel for a first boot on a clean install, then I compile a custom kernel before all else. Today, I compiled 2.6.34 and that replaced 2.6.32. Compiling kernels is getting very complex with each new release, and I am no kernel expert.

Also today, I experimented with an initrd on the stock generic kernel. It worked just fine, but it was a bit slower to boot than my kernel. That said, we are only talking about ~10 seconds. Later, when I have more time, I am going to give the above script a run and see what happens. Curiosity killed the cat!

The generic kernel is about 2.4mb and my kernel is about 1.9mb. Not a big difference anymore.

Richard Cranium 06-15-2010 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alien Bob (Post 4004295)
The script /usr/share/mkinitrd/mkinitrd_command_generator.sh does just that.

Eric

Cool. Does the installer ask if you want to run this? (I haven't done a full install in quite a while.)

For that matter, why isn't this in root's standard path? It Would Be Nice (TM) if tab-completion of "mkinitrd" offered "mkinitrd_command_generator.sh" as a possible completion.

2handband 06-15-2010 03:06 PM

Okay, another issue... it was a mistake to package Firefox 3.6. It's crash-prone. I'm going to remove it and install 3.5.

Alien Bob 06-15-2010 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Cranium (Post 4004601)
Cool. Does the installer ask if you want to run this? (I haven't done a full install in quite a while.)

No, but internally, the team had this working end of 2008 already. It's just never gone public.

Quote:

For that matter, why isn't this in root's standard path? It Would Be Nice (TM) if tab-completion of "mkinitrd" offered "mkinitrd_command_generator.sh" as a possible completion.
Not everything needs to be that obvious. Reading documentation in the Slackware DVD's root-directory is what reveals the existence of this script.

Eric


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.