Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
10-01-2014, 03:51 PM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruario
You really should not downgrade and I think it highly unlikely that Pat will downgrade the official package. Firefox 32.0.3 was released specifically to fix the BERserk SSL Flaw (CVE-2014-1568, a vulnerability that could enable a digital signature forgery attack).
Intel Security General Manager Mike Fey has commented
As you can see this is a really nasty issue and if it wasn't for Shellshock I suspect we would have had a lot more discussion about this here.
P.S. I should add that almost every release of all major browsers includes one or more security updates. It is therefore not recommended that you run older browsers
|
Technically, the current 32.0.3 build of Firefox is unusable in my system(s, because I talk about two). So I have to choose to regress to previous version or to change the browser. Even IF the 32.0.3 version is secure like Fort Knox, I can't afford to use it, from clear reasons.
Last edited by Darth Vader; 10-01-2014 at 03:58 PM.
|
|
|
10-01-2014, 05:24 PM
|
#17
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2014
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
I had the same extremely slow mozilla-firefox 32.0.3 from the slackware-current repository (32-bit). Thanks to an earlier comment, I removed it; downloaded the binary file from mozilla and bunzipped and untarred it in /usr/local/ and it is running normally. So it is not necessary to build, if you just want a working firefox.
|
|
|
10-02-2014, 04:42 AM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,557
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Vader
Technically, the current 32.0.3 build of Firefox is unusable in my system(s, because I talk about two). So I have to choose to regress to previous version or to change the browser. Even IF the 32.0.3 version is secure like Fort Knox, I can't afford to use it, from clear reasons.
|
If you use the browser for general browsing and reading, it may not be such a problem but I would not use it for anything secure, like banking or shopping. If this is a problem, install another browser instead (or at least alongside) until Mozilla fixes the issue. If you are a Firefox fan perhaps you should consider Firefox ESR 31.1.1, which also has the fix. The preferences format used for ESR will probably not be compatible with 32, so move it out of the way and start clean. You can move your current preferences back when Mozilla have fixed the performance problem in the 32.0.x (or 33) series.
Another option would be to check if the pre-compiled binary of 32.0.3 that Mozilla provide exhibit the same issue. You can use my latest-firefox script to quickly convert the Mozilla binary into Slackware package format.
Just fetch the script, read through it (to satisfy yourself that it does nothing crazy) and then execute it as follows:
This will find the latest build for your architecture, download and repackage it automatically into Slackware format (it does not require root access to do this).
If you want to create a package for Firefox ESR instead, issue:
Code:
$ FFESR=Y ./latest-firefox
If you decide to continue to use 32.0 for unsecured browsing, you can also use the script to repackage the older version for you, e.g.:
Code:
$ VERSION=32.0 ./latest-firefox
|
|
|
10-02-2014, 04:45 AM
|
#19
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,557
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Vader
OK, I tested the binary shipped by Mozilla, and surprise! That build works OK, maybe slightly slower, but barely noticeable.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by prtn
I had the same extremely slow mozilla-firefox 32.0.3 from the slackware-current repository (32-bit). Thanks to an earlier comment, I removed it; downloaded the binary file from mozilla and bunzipped and untarred it in /usr/local/ and it is running normally. So it is not necessary to build, if you just want a working firefox.
|
Just make a real package, its easy. This script will do all the work for you:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruario
You can use my latest-firefox script to quickly convert the Mozilla binary into Slackware package format.
|
This is much better than running an older 32.0 package.
Last edited by ruario; 10-02-2014 at 04:49 AM.
|
|
|
10-02-2014, 07:17 AM
|
#20
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2010
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 288
Rep:
|
If anyone gets this again, check the processes... look for a firefox process with plugins as the possible issue.
For some reason I have yet to quite figure out, the previous few releases of firefox have on occasion had their plugin process get out of hand and take one of my processor cores and just thrash it until i killed the offending process. Just shutting down firefox didn't do it, I had to hunt it down and kill -9 to get it to stop.
Oddly for me, I have yet to have the issue return with the latest -current firefox, but the symptoms were too close to not comment.
I didn't send a bug report to Pat as it seemed to be something in plugins, possibly google-talk or flash, which frankly are not his issue.
|
|
|
10-03-2014, 07:46 AM
|
#21
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2013
Location: NJ / USA
Distribution: Slackware 64 -Current
Posts: 232
Rep:
|
Do you have any add-on/extensions installed in firefox? They can cause slowdowns after upgrading .
|
|
|
10-04-2014, 05:05 AM
|
#22
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2012
Distribution: Slackware-current, 32bit
Posts: 84
Rep:
|
I can confirm this issue. It doesn't matter if firefox extensions are present or not.
Performance is terrible on firefox 32.0.3: when i start FF i have to wait 10-15 seconds or so to let it do what it wants to do, pages load much slower (even if i have only one website on one tab). On SeaMonkey, which is also bundled in Slackware, everything is fine (smooth and fast).
EDIT:
I downloaded Firefox 32.0.3 from mozilla's site and it works flawlessly.
Looks like something's wrong with the Slackware's x32 package.
Just in case (it is firefox 32.0.3 32-bit from latest Slackware's update):
$ md5sum `which firefox`
57f9dcc112896978359fdfab64996cc8 /usr/bin/firefox
Last edited by Jefferson; 10-04-2014 at 05:21 AM.
Reason: added info
|
|
|
10-04-2014, 09:07 PM
|
#23
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 4,750
|
This is now fixed in latest -current update:
Quote:
xap/mozilla-firefox-32.0.3-i486-2.txz: Rebuilt.
Recompiled with -O2 optimization to fix sluggishness on the 32-bit build.
|
|
|
3 members found this post helpful.
|
10-05-2014, 01:14 PM
|
#24
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2012
Distribution: Slackware-current, 32bit
Posts: 84
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by willysr
This is now fixed in latest -current update:
|
Nice! Thanks. Works like a charm.
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 11:41 AM
|
#25
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2014
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 497
Rep:
|
Much much better. Thank you.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|