Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.


View Poll Results: What is the Slacker's choice FS?
ext2 5 2.58%
ext3 87 44.85%
JFS 29 14.95%
ReiserFS 53 27.32%
XFS 20 10.31%
Voters: 194. You may not vote on this poll

  Search this Thread
Old 06-18-2008, 07:48 PM   #1
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware 14.2 64-bit with multilib
Posts: 2,373

Rep: Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636
A Slacker's choice for a FS...

Since the recent thread about filesystems and which to use, I would like to cast a poll to see what *IS* the official FS used by all us Slackers.

I already vote for JFS, and the reason is that it is the fastest on my old machine, and offers the best throughput even on my superfast dual core notebook, yet very stable and recovers nicely during a dirty unmount when there is a power outtage (this applies obviously to my old machine, see my sig...) So, here we go, what is the official FS for Slackers (at least here on LQ, )

Last edited by Jeebizz; 06-19-2008 at 02:16 PM.
Old 06-18-2008, 08:08 PM   #2
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware64-current, Slackware64 14.2, OpenBSD 6.1
Posts: 5,158

Rep: Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154
JFS all the way for me:-)
Old 06-18-2008, 10:42 PM   #3
Registered: Feb 2008
Posts: 201

Rep: Reputation: 31
Huh, I thought everyone just used ext3... guess I'll need to check out some other filesystems next time I reinstall...
Old 06-18-2008, 10:48 PM   #4
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware 14.2 64-bit with multilib
Posts: 2,373

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636
So far it is JFS, but this is early and I am not calling anything yet. It can go either way. Reasons for your preferred FS is not really required, but if you do decide to list your reasoning for using said FS, that would be helpful. To reiterate on my reasoning for using JFS, is that it seems the most balanced, and even on a very VERY old machine, it's performance makes all the difference, and so using it even on a more modern machine does make all the difference.

Last edited by Jeebizz; 06-18-2008 at 10:49 PM.
Old 06-18-2008, 10:56 PM   #5
Registered: May 2007
Posts: 517

Rep: Reputation: 191Reputation: 191
I'd use JFS on any new machine too. Smallest memory and cpu footprint of a journaling fs that I know of. And quite good performance.

Last edited by the3dfxdude; 06-18-2008 at 11:00 PM.
Old 06-18-2008, 11:35 PM   #6
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,235

Rep: Reputation: 302Reputation: 302Reputation: 302Reputation: 302
I use ext3 on both my boxes. I will have a look at jfs next though.
Old 06-19-2008, 12:42 AM   #7
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Distribution: Slackware64 13.37
Posts: 34

Rep: Reputation: 16
I'm just change to JFS recently. Reinstall Slackware because I want to re-arrange my partitions, so it's a chance to change file system too. Not so sure that if I heard from this forums or #Slackware that JFS is quite fast, that's why I try it out.
Old 06-19-2008, 01:32 AM   #8
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD
Posts: 47

Rep: Reputation: 16
I'm using ext3 with a full journal, the best you can get - it's really mature.
Old 06-19-2008, 02:03 AM   #9
LQ Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1287Reputation: 1287Reputation: 1287Reputation: 1287Reputation: 1287Reputation: 1287Reputation: 1287Reputation: 1287Reputation: 1287
JFS is the best, second I'd put XFS.
Old 06-19-2008, 02:04 AM   #10
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Tübingen
Distribution: Fedora 9 (Thinkpad T60), Debian 3.1 (Server)
Posts: 51

Rep: Reputation: 15
Using EXT3 because its the most compatible across all OS, I use Vista, MacOS, Linux Machines (even though I don't own a Mac right now ), you can get a mature drive for pretty much every OS for EXT3, and its quite fast and has journaling, too.

Had XFS running earlier but suffered Data loss and incompatibility.
Old 06-19-2008, 06:11 AM   #11
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu (yes, both)
Posts: 463

Rep: Reputation: 31
JFS: I used reiserfs for a long time, and JFS seems to recover faster, work faster in the first place, and I have had no major problems (none with reiserfs either).

Old 06-19-2008, 06:37 AM   #12
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,847

Rep: Reputation: 128Reputation: 128
Originally Posted by ischi View Post
Had XFS running earlier but suffered Data loss and incompatibility.
Just to balance this comment, I've been running XFS for years now, and suffered no data loss.

Of course, now I've said that...

Compatibility isn't something I need right now since everything I have is linux based, or otherwise, it's networked transparently
Old 06-19-2008, 06:40 AM   #13
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 2,021

Rep: Reputation: 386Reputation: 386Reputation: 386Reputation: 386
In the beginning, it was ext2. The thing that used to annoy me about it was the FSCK every 10th reboot. Sometimes it'd go for half an hour or so.

Then, I migrated to reiserfs, but then I read about the problems it could have recovering certain types of file. I tried ext3, but it is just so darn slow.

So I've been using XFS for the past couple of years, with nothing major to report. At the time I switched to it, it was the fastest, and has proven to be reliable for me. BUT... I seem to recall reading something about XFS under Linux having to operate through some sort of translation layer, but I don't know how true it is... I haven't noticed any major performance bottlenecks, anyhow.

Last edited by rkelsen; 06-19-2008 at 07:21 AM.
Old 06-19-2008, 06:56 AM   #14
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Halifax, NS
Distribution: Linux Mint 11
Posts: 29

Rep: Reputation: 15
ReiserFS here. So far so good!
Old 06-19-2008, 07:18 AM   #15
LQ Guru
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Rep: Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551Reputation: 551

Originally Posted by terrio View Post
ReiserFS here. So far so good!
Hi terrio! You are the first user I have seen from Halifax/NS-- I'm from Halifax too

On subject: I still use Ext2, and will for the foreseeable future just because it is what I used when I installed.. When I came to Linux and was installing Slackware, I knew little to nothing about all the Linux file systems, and Ext2 seemed to be a 'standard' and 'normal', and I didn't know what was involved with the journaled systems.

Based on the feedback in this thread, I will at some point look into JFS and learn more about it.

FWIW I have been happy with Ext2; it's reliable; no data losses, and FSCK is infrequent enough & fast enough to not bother me.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new laptop help making choice (more laptops add to poll) italiano40 Linux - Laptop and Netbook 16 05-01-2008 09:12 AM
LXer: Poll: No easy choice between open source, commercial LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-06-2006 10:33 AM
Members' choice awards: Show the poll choices? vharishankar LQ Suggestions & Feedback 0 01-08-2005 05:24 AM
Poll: MP3/CD player of choice for KDE rikkulinux Debian 2 08-19-2003 10:12 PM
terminals in members choice award poll? doublefailure LQ Suggestions & Feedback 2 04-01-2003 07:58 AM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration