Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
02-08-2014, 06:14 AM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Yorks. W.R. 167397
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,307
Rep:
|
Code:
-MODULE_LICENSE("NVIDIA");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Wow. I don't know who would be more angry about this blatant act of copyright infringement - nVidia, or the thousands of kernel contributors.
And at the end of the day, all that patch does is prevent the kernel's taint flag from being set. It won't fix any build problems at all.
|
|
|
02-08-2014, 06:35 AM
|
#17
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2014
Posts: 5
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 55020
Code:
-MODULE_LICENSE("NVIDIA");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Wow. I don't know who would be more angry about this blatant act of copyright infringement - nVidia, or the thousands of kernel contributors.
And at the end of the day, all that patch does is prevent the kernel's taint flag from being set. It won't fix any build problems at all.
|
But it fixed. No more "FATAL: modpost: GPL-incompatible module nvidia.ko uses GPL-only symbol 'mutex_lock_nested'" error for me
|
|
|
02-08-2014, 06:47 AM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Yorks. W.R. 167397
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,307
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LightStar
But it fixed. No more "FATAL: modpost: GPL-incompatible module nvidia.ko uses GPL-only symbol 'mutex_lock_nested'" error for me
|
That's not a build problem. That's working as designed.
If nVidia wants to put its hand in the GPL cookie-jar...
|
|
|
02-08-2014, 04:53 PM
|
#19
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,564
|
It's a dirty fix regardless. That's a fix better suited for developers only, testers, and such crowds, not end users.
It is nothing more than a kernel license lockout avoidance, not a fix. That feature that is disabled is only a kernel feature used by debugging and developments. You gain no benefit from applying that except extra debugging.
|
|
|
02-09-2014, 12:02 AM
|
#20
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2014
Posts: 5
Rep:
|
You are right indeed. But can't find any other solution yet. Nvidia kernel driver 331.20 won't build for 3.12 kernel otherwise.
|
|
|
02-09-2014, 03:27 AM
|
#21
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LightStar
...
Nvidia kernel driver 331.20 won't build for 3.12 kernel otherwise.
|
How did you come to this conclusion? No one else have this problem. Besides, is there any reason to not use v331.38 or later drivers?
|
|
|
02-09-2014, 03:48 AM
|
#22
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2014
Posts: 5
Rep:
|
Well, topic starter had this problem (and by the way he tried to build newer version 331.38). I had it too and just posted my solution because didn't seen any other solution in this thread which is working (other then using stock 3.10.17 kernel, which is in fact no solution at all). If you have any other idea how to solve it - just post it please.
|
|
|
02-09-2014, 04:15 AM
|
#23
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2014
Posts: 5
Rep:
|
But sorry, didn't tried "disable lock debugging" thing yet. Will do it when have time.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|