LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Slackware (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/)
-   -   No -stable 32-bit (x86) changelog at slackware.com? (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/no-stable-32-bit-x86-changelog-at-slackware-com-937497/)

Lufbery 03-31-2012 10:51 PM

No -stable 32-bit (x86) changelog at slackware.com?
 
1 Attachment(s)
Hi all,

I went to slackware.com a few minutes ago* and did not see the changelog for Slackware 13.37 (the 32-bit -stable). See my screen capture.

The real thing is still where it should be on ftp.slackware.com, but I wonder what's up with the web site.

Any ideas?

* 11:45 pm-ish US-Eastern on March 31st

willysr 03-31-2012 11:12 PM

yeah, perhaps it's a glitch

wildwizard 03-31-2012 11:39 PM

I can see them all but they have been buggy for a week or so now.

kingbeowulf 04-01-2012 02:36 PM

Looks like BDFL is dropping 32-bit support.....

cwizardone 04-01-2012 03:08 PM

The changelog for Slackware-current (32 bit) at slackware.com was updated on 29 March, but the Slackware64-current changelog has not been updated since the 26th (as of about 30 minutes ago).

However, if you the check the changelog for Slackware64-current at the Oregon State University mirror it is correct, i.e., last updated on the 29th of March.

Lufbery 04-01-2012 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingbeowulf (Post 4642155)
Looks like BDFL is dropping 32-bit support.....

April fool. Right?

32-bit stable is still not showing up on the page. And, it is still there at the source.

Not a big deal, but a strange glitch nonetheless.

Regards,

PrinceCruise 04-19-2012 08:06 PM

Any updates on this....(?)
I still can't see the changelog for 13.37 32-bit.

Regards.

kingbeowulf 04-19-2012 09:00 PM

PrinceCruise, You bonehead....why don't you try a mirror?

http://slackware.osuosl.org/slackwar.../ChangeLog.txt

PrinceCruise 04-19-2012 09:58 PM

First, that was rude.
Second, I know about mirrors, was wandering if it's going be on the main site like x86-64 bit version, just a new guy to Slackware.

Regards.

EDIT : Seems like people are over the top because of the recent Slackware down heat over here, I'm asking for what the OP asked 2 months back, not fearing a drop of version, clearly.

kingbeowulf 04-19-2012 10:34 PM

Slackware 32-bit has existed since the beginning of time. x86_64 is a recent addition. If you look carefully you would see Slackware-current x86_32 changelog posted. What make maakes you think Slakcware-stable 13.37 x86_32 support would suddenly be dropped?

This has been discussed to death here on LQ. There have been some server issues. If read this thread carefully, as well as a few others (LQ has a search function...) you will understand what is going on.

Yes, sometimes there are stupid questions....

PrinceCruise 04-20-2012 09:34 AM

Hey

Quote:

What make maakes you think Slakcware-stable 13.37 x86_32 support would suddenly be dropped?
Please, learn to read carefully. Who on this earth is wandering about dropping support for a version?
I simply asked any pointers on if the 32 bit changelog is going be seen over the main site any time soon or not, as the thread is here for 2 months and in google search it showed up on top?


Quote:

This has been discussed to death here on LQ. There have been some server issues. If read this thread carefully, as well as a few others (LQ has a search function...) you will understand what is going on.
I have been there already HOWEVER It's irrelevant of what I asked here, clearly.

Regards.

EDIT : Oh I see in this thread you were actually the one who doubted on the BDFL dropping support for 32 bit 2 months back. I smell sheer hypocrisy now.

unSpawn 04-20-2012 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kingbeowulf (Post 4657932)
PrinceCruise, You bonehead....

I don't see any smilies. So stay nice, place nice, OK?

cwizardone 04-20-2012 10:41 AM

About 3 hours ago it was slow, but I was able to get onto slackware.com and 32 bit stable was listed in the change logs.
However, I just tried again, and after a long wait was able to view the changelog page and 32 bit stable was Not there.
Also, as mentioned before 32 bit -current is up to date (unless there has been more changes in the last few hours) but 64 bit -current hasn't been updated since March.

@PrinceCruise,
Don't let the er... zealots get you down. They mean well (sometimes).
:)

ruario 04-20-2012 12:06 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by cwizardone (Post 4642167)
The changelog for Slackware-current (32 bit) at slackware.com was updated on 29 March, but the Slackware64-current changelog has not been updated since the 26th (as of about 30 minutes ago).

However, if you the check the changelog for Slackware64-current at the Oregon State University mirror it is correct, i.e., last updated on the 29th of March.

I'm not sure I understand what you are saying here. The www.slackware.com/changelog/ page just links straight to the Oregon State University mirror. So if the Oregon State University mirror is correct (as you state) then slackware.com must by definition be correct as well. I have attached a screenshot so you can see what www.slackware.com/changelog/ looks like to me. It links directly to these two files:

ftp.osuosl.org/pub/slackware/slackware-current/ChangeLog.txt
ftp.osuosl.org/pub/slackware/slackware64-current/ChangeLog.txt

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwizardone (Post 4658449)
32 bit -current is up to date (unless there has been more changes in the last few hours) but 64 bit -current hasn't been updated since March.

That is not what I am seeing. And as far as I can tell, they are largely the same.

cwizardone 04-20-2012 02:57 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Here you go. The snapshot is no more than 15 minutes old.

kingbeowulf 04-20-2012 11:32 PM

Just because a web server starts to glitch does not mean the data is not there. ftp.slackware.com works fine; its all there. The mirrors work fine and are updated to within a few days. So www.slackware.com burps and everyone is up in arms, despite evidence to the contrary.

When did Slackers get this uptight and panicky?

So lets all start panicking now as the domain name is set to expire *soon*
Quote:

Expiration Date: 25-dec-2015
(DISCLAIMER: This post drips with sarcasm. )

kingbeowulf 04-20-2012 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrinceCruise (Post 4658391)

EDIT : Oh I see in this thread you were actually the one who doubted on the BDFL dropping support for 32 bit 2 months back. I smell sheer hypocrisy now.

April Fool.

Ilgar 04-24-2012 05:40 AM

Any news on this? I was using the 32-bit Changelog page to track security updates, but it's not there anymore...

ottavio 04-24-2012 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ilgar (Post 4661548)
Any news on this? I was using the 32-bit Changelog page to track security updates, but it's not there anymore...

http://slackware.osuosl.org/slackware/ChangeLog.txt

Quote:

Mon Apr 23 18:18:31 UTC 2012 patches/packages/openssl-0.9.8v-i486-1_slack13.37.txz: Upgraded. Fixes some potentially exploitable buffer overflows. Thanks to Tavis Ormandy, Google Security Team, for discovering this issue and to Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> for fixing it. For more information, see: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename...=CVE-2012-2110 (* Security fix *) patches/packages/openssl-solibs-0.9.8v-i486-1_slack13.37.txz: Upgraded. Fixes some potentially exploitable buffer overflows. Thanks to Tavis Ormandy, Google Security Team, for discovering this issue and to Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> for fixing it. For more information, see: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename...=CVE-2012-2110 (* Security fix *) extra/wicd/wicd-1.7.2.1-i486-1_slack13.37.txz: Upgraded. This fixes a local privilege escalation that allows a user to set arbitrary pre/post-connection scripts through D-Bus which are then executed as the wicd user (generally root). For more information, see: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename...=CVE-2012-2095 Thanks to dapal for the workaround allowing us to skip the pybabel requirement (for now), and to Robby Workman for the script update. (* Security fix *)
Now can we all stop whining please?

cwizardone 04-24-2012 06:33 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by ottavio (Post 4661563)
http://slackware.osuosl.org/slackware/ChangeLog.txt
Now can we all stop whining please?

Well, NO!
The regular users of Slackware may know about the mirrors, but new users and those who would think, heaven forbid, the correct and most likely place to find the most recent information about the Slackware distribution would be, surprise, slackware.com, would be wrong. Once they find out that Slackware.com is not being maintained, what sort of opinion would they have of Slackware?

As of just a few minutes ago:

Ilgar 04-24-2012 07:05 AM

@ottavio:

I know about the mirrors. I'm not whining about anything, including the server problem. Obviously a link has been mistakenly removed from the page and I'm pointing it out.

cwizardone 04-24-2012 07:11 AM

It has been this way for quite a while. Long before the server went down a week or so ago. Ditto the 32 bit -current change log being updated, but not the 64 bit -current change log. Again, I'm speaking of the changelogs on slackware.com, not the mirrors.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 PM.