SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Finally got my sound to work in Slack after loading the SBLive module by editing rc.modules. Just wondering why Slack doesn't need a sound server like 'artsd' or similiar to get sound. I remember that in Redhat even though my sound card was properly setup ( I would guess that Redhat had also loaded the SBLive module at bootup) I had to have Artsd sound server running in the background to hear anything . I also had to chmod 666 the /dev/dsp as 'su'. Is this a normal Slack sound setup step?
thanks
Slack is awesome and unbloated! I feel skinny!!
Last edited by purpleburple; 07-24-2002 at 10:16 PM.
Yeah, by default Slack doesn't add the sound into the kernel, so you either have to recompile your kernel, or add sound as a module. I thought it was a good idea, because it forced me to recompile my kernel, because otherwise I wouldn't have even bothered
I thought ARTsd is a KDE thing? Will it work outside of KDE?
I believe it works like "esd" in that it allows you to play several audio streams at once. While you don't neeed either, you'll get errors if two processes try to use the sound hardware at the same time.
So if you didn't load KDE, you don't need ARTsd.
I've always used "esd" (enlightenment sound daemon) for this purpose instead, which seems to work everywhere.
You should edit /etc/rc.d/rc.modules. There you will have to decomment (remove '#') one line in Sound section.
I think it is the first or second line, so those lines show what modules should be loaded and what not. You can decomment 1 or 2 line and your SB will work ( I think, my friend SB works that way )
he he he, Hey nautilus, purpleburple actually got the soundcard to work, just had some questions on why things aren't the same in Slack. The first (opening) paragraph actually says this.
But good info there, it's handy to know as you will see it alot, just watch for the questions
Distribution: Debian Sid, SourceMage 0.9.5, & To be Continued on a TP
Posts: 800
Rep:
Well I've done everything to get my sound to work with Slackware 8.0 and AC'97 builtin soundcard and I still don't have sound.
Everything seems to work, if I run Xmms, it looks as if its playing a MP3 song with the volume low but nothing is coming from speakers. Volume is set to high, speakers set to high.
I've always used "esd" (enlightenment sound daemon) for this purpose instead, which seems to work everywhere.
Does this daemon run everytime enlightenment is loaded? Also I've always done the following for sound. I've recompiled the kernel in addition to uncommenting the right line in rc.modules for my sound card. If what you are saying it true (that only one of the two is necessary) which is the better method if there is one.
Originally posted by enzo250gto ]Does this daemon run everytime enlightenment is loaded?
If you are talking about the enlightenment window manager, the answer is no. In fact I don't think it has anything to do with it.
Quote:
Also I've always done the following for sound. I've recompiled the kernel in addition to uncommenting the right line in rc.modules for my sound card. If what you are saying it true (that only one of the two is necessary) which is the better method if there is one.
You don't have to recompile the kernel unless the driver has not been either compiled into (rare, these days) the kernel or compiled as an external module (common, these days). I usually recompile the kernel for other reasons like to take out all the stuff I don't need, or to optimize it for my hardware.
Typically the module will exist somewhere in /lib/modules/2.4.18/kernel/drivers/sound already. It sometimes doesn't exist in rc.modules, so I sometimes have to add the entry myself.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.