LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-13-2017, 02:27 PM   #16
bamunds
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Mounds View MN
Distribution: Slackware64-14.2-Multilib XDM/FVWM3
Posts: 780

Rep: Reputation: 260Reputation: 260Reputation: 260

UPDATE: I've since reset Firefox 50.1 to turn off DRM, restarted Firefox, then turn on DRM and the website view.yahoo.com is now working correctly again. My exact configuration is Slackware 64 -current, with Firefox 50.1 from slackware64 repository, with DRM turned on and no Flash installed, plugins working with Firefox are HTTPS Everywhere, uBlock origin (whitelist view.yahoo.com) and Agent Switcher set to Default. Hope this helps others trying to work with Firefox and DRM/CDM sites. Cheers.

Last edited by bamunds; 01-14-2017 at 01:56 PM. Reason: corrected repository source of firefox
 
Old 01-14-2017, 11:01 AM   #17
AlleyTrotter
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Coal Township PA
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 783

Rep: Reputation: 479Reputation: 479Reputation: 479Reputation: 479Reputation: 479
Quote:
Originally Posted by bamunds View Post
UPDATE: with Firefox 50.1 from alienbob, .
Where can I find this? Not on bear site

I see you corrected your post, I was looking for the above "Firefox 50.1 from alienbob"

Last edited by AlleyTrotter; 01-15-2017 at 07:50 AM.
 
Old 01-14-2017, 01:55 PM   #18
bamunds
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Mounds View MN
Distribution: Slackware64-14.2-Multilib XDM/FVWM3
Posts: 780

Rep: Reputation: 260Reputation: 260Reputation: 260
I'm not sure what you are asking about the Slackware 64 -current, or the firefox, or the extensions?
The Slackware 64 -current is from slackware.com. The firefox is from slackware64 repository, not alienbob. The extensions are from mozilla developers.
 
Old 01-17-2017, 12:59 PM   #19
rob.rice
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: slack what ever
Posts: 1,076

Rep: Reputation: 205Reputation: 205Reputation: 205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
Last year Chrome for Linux would not be accepted by Netflix and you would have to spoofe the UA to be something MS Windows. So there is progress.
I assume that Netflix only allows browsers that have an official greenlight from Google (who own the DRM plugin technology used, Widevine DCM).
AFAIK
there is no way to download videos with chromium
this could be why net flicks allows chromium
 
Old 01-17-2017, 01:21 PM   #20
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,557

Rep: Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob.rice View Post
AFAIK
there is no way to download videos with chromium
this could be why net flicks allows chromium
Sure there is. In fact if you do a straight video tag with no styling you even get a download button right in the player.

It doesn't help with netflix however since that uses drm.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-17-2017, 02:27 PM   #21
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob.rice View Post
AFAIK
there is no way to download videos with chromium
this could be why net flicks allows chromium
Of course Chromium can download videos. Take for instance Video Downloader Professional - free plugin for Chrome/Chromium will find any video URL on a page. Not DRM-protected video like Netflix though.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-17-2017, 06:33 PM   #22
rob.rice
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: slack what ever
Posts: 1,076

Rep: Reputation: 205Reputation: 205Reputation: 205
well I know better now
might try chromium
 
Old 01-17-2017, 07:54 PM   #23
PROBLEMCHYLD
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,201

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
Oh, it works, Firefox can play Netflix videos now and it does not require Flash for that. I only had to enable DRM playback and install a UA switcher and set the User Agent to Chrome 55 for Linux x86_64 (copied the UA string "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/55.0.2883.75 Safari/537.36" from my Chromium browser).
I tried your string, and it doesn't work. Did I do something wrong, or maybe missed a detail in instructions? I've FF 50. I'm on Slackware 32bit with the latest MLED updates. If I can't get it, I'll just have to dual boot, and I'm trying to get out of the habit, when and if it don't work in linux, use Windows. It gets pretty annoying having to multiboot sometimes. I'm not pointing fingers and don't blame anyone.
 
Old 01-17-2017, 09:48 PM   #24
bamunds
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Mounds View MN
Distribution: Slackware64-14.2-Multilib XDM/FVWM3
Posts: 780

Rep: Reputation: 260Reputation: 260Reputation: 260
I use Firefox. Install Agent Switcher from extension search. Then make it appear on your toolbar if it doesn't automatically appear. Next click on the AgentSwitcher icon and go to Edit User Agents. next in the opened window click on the Download User Agents link and get the latest user agents lists and then import them in the same window. After the import simply click on your AgentSwitcher icon and select the Chrome user agent from "Browser - Linux" or "Browser - Windows". You should be good to go from there. It is a few more steps, but it is easier than adding the user agent string if you aren't familiar with all the required fields.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-19-2017, 02:49 AM   #25
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,557

Rep: Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761
Quote:
Originally Posted by PROBLEMCHYLD View Post
I tried your string, and it doesn't work. Did I do something wrong, or maybe missed a detail in instructions? I've FF 50. I'm on Slackware 32bit with the latest MLED updates.
Check you UA is setup correctly by confirming via a webapge that echos it back to you, e.g. http://echo.opera.com/

Quote:
Originally Posted by PROBLEMCHYLD View Post
If I can't get it, I'll just have to dual boot, and I'm trying to get out of the habit, when and if it don't work in linux, use Windows. It gets pretty annoying having to multiboot sometimes.
Surely it would be far easier to just install a chromium based browser alongside and use it only for Netflix. There is no reason why you have to reboot to Windows. You have just decided you would prefer do that than use the simpler working solution that was provided.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-19-2017, 09:30 AM   #26
PROBLEMCHYLD
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,201

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
It's not that I want to boot to Windows, at the same time I keep a lite and clean system. I don't want multiple browsers on my computer. I know many people have multiple browsers. I'm the opposite. I also have Firefox configure to my needs and I will have to do this all over again for chrome. I have a unique setup, and don't care to compromise it because you might think or have the attitude, one size fits all. I'll be willing to try other workarounds, but if I cant get it working, I won't shed a tear, I'll move on. Thanks
 
Old 01-19-2017, 12:37 PM   #27
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Quote:
Originally Posted by PROBLEMCHYLD View Post
I don't want multiple browsers on my computer.
Oh, but multiple OS is OK then?
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-19-2017, 03:20 PM   #28
PROBLEMCHYLD
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,201

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
It's not OK, but Linux isn't perfect nor is Windows. It took me almost 6 months just to get a partial L2TP connection and I have yet to get a complete and full successful connection to my L2TP server. I have kids and work 12 hours a day 7 days a week. 14 days straight and 2 days off. I don't have the time to troubleshoot every area Linux is not capable of completing the task at hand. Read the forums and you'll see, I'm not the only one with this problem. So, before you start leaning on me, fallback. If it's not your way then it's a problem. Oh, the irony. And yes, I have to log into Windows where linux/Slackware lacks competence when it comes to certain protocols or the task at hand. I hope I made myself clear.
 
Old 01-19-2017, 04:34 PM   #29
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
No you did not make yourself clear. You work hard, barely have time for r&r because basically what you seem to be doing is surviving.
Why then, is it out of the question that you run a simple "installpkg", get Chrome or Chromium, and get the fsck on with your life?
Spare me the sorry tale.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-19-2017, 04:45 PM   #30
PROBLEMCHYLD
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,201

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
No you did not make yourself clear. You work hard, barely have time for r&r because basically what you seem to be doing is surviving.
Why then, is it out of the question that you run a simple "installpkg", get Chrome or Chromium, and get the fsck on with your life?
Spare me the sorry tale.
Out of respect for one of the mods, I'm changing this.

Last edited by PROBLEMCHYLD; 01-27-2017 at 06:37 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chromium drops NPAPI, Adobe flashplugin not supported on Linux etc badbetty Linux - Software 2 03-08-2016 10:41 AM
LXer: Google Shuts Off NPAPI in Chrome LXer Syndicated Linux News 1 04-22-2015 01:01 AM
[SOLVED] Latest Flash Player in NPAPI browsers kamils096 Linux - General 2 07-08-2014 03:57 PM
XLib _XSend assertion with NPAPI plugin padolph Linux - Software 0 08-05-2009 06:25 PM
Flashplayer Greebstreebling Debian 5 01-29-2008 01:00 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration