LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-20-2016, 05:45 PM   #1
ChuangTzu
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: Where ever needed
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718

Rep: Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857
LXQt on Slackware 14.1


LXQt is running great using Aliens packages http://www.slackware.com/~alien/slackbuilds/lxqt/

Makes a great contender for a lightweight KDE, you can use Kwin with it, but I chose the default openbox. Currently have Firefox (2tabs), KSys, Claws-Mail and Keepassx running with 0-1% CPU and 600MB mem, on a HP Compaq AMD Athlon II, 3Ghz, 8GB RAM.

Thank You Alien!


Ill post a screenshot if anyone is interested.
 
Old 05-20-2016, 07:13 PM   #2
heyjann
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2015
Posts: 102

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Those packages are slightly older versions, not that that is necessarily a bad thing. I vaguely recall Alien not being too impressed at some point about how quick the LXQT development had moved on to focus on QT5.

What would you say are the main advantages of LXQT compared to its alternatives? I get the impression it is 'stuck in the middle' a bit, not enough flashiness with the kitchen sink included compared to your KDEs and Gnomes for those who like that sort of thing, and not quite lightweight enough for those who like to really minimise RAM/CPU usage. Maybe I am wrong about that, xfce4 is a bit like that too and it's popular enough.

I would like to know more about it because LXQT is definitely the DE I would have a good look at if I wanted to experiment with assembling a QT-only desktop, but I do not come across too many who are using it. I'm using jwm at the moment myself, because I don't mind the 'Classic Desktop' (as the LXQT website calls it), and I like that it is just one package to install and keep updated, with few dependencies and a single-file config.
 
Old 05-20-2016, 08:19 PM   #3
ChuangTzu
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: Where ever needed
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857
Quote:
Originally Posted by heyjann View Post
Those packages are slightly older versions, not that that is necessarily a bad thing. I vaguely recall Alien not being too impressed at some point about how quick the LXQT development had moved on to focus on QT5.

What would you say are the main advantages of LXQT compared to its alternatives? I get the impression it is 'stuck in the middle' a bit, not enough flashiness with the kitchen sink included compared to your KDEs and Gnomes for those who like that sort of thing, and not quite lightweight enough for those who like to really minimise RAM/CPU usage. Maybe I am wrong about that, xfce4 is a bit like that too and it's popular enough.

I would like to know more about it because LXQT is definitely the DE I would have a good look at if I wanted to experiment with assembling a QT-only desktop, but I do not come across too many who are using it. I'm using jwm at the moment myself, because I don't mind the 'Classic Desktop' (as the LXQT website calls it), and I like that it is just one package to install and keep updated, with few dependencies and a single-file config.
I was mainly trying it out to see if I wanted to install it on a friends laptop as a lightweight KDE. Personally, I usually switch between icewm, fluxbox and KDE depending on my mood, usually a WM person. JWM is very nice, used it on puppy and antix in the past, never tried it on Slack.

Did you use a jwm config from somewhere or create one?
 
Old 05-21-2016, 11:07 AM   #4
gargamel
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Distribution: Slackware, OpenSuSE
Posts: 1,839

Rep: Reputation: 242Reputation: 242Reputation: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by heyjann View Post
[...]
I would like to know more about it because LXQT is definitely the DE I would have a good look at if I wanted to experiment with assembling a QT-only desktop, [...]
Did you have a look at Lumina Desktop?
Also still immature and incomplete like LxQT, but let's see, how the two projects get along...

gargamel
 
Old 05-21-2016, 12:36 PM   #5
heyjann
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2015
Posts: 102

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I had heard of Lumina, but at the time I wasn't enthusiastic about mandatory fluxbox instead of the choice of window manager LX** gives. Could be to do with (preferred) licenses, Lumina coming from the BSD camp and fluxbox being MIT-licensed. But also one to keep an eye on indeed, thanks for reminding me of it.

For JWM colours&look, as a jumping-off point I indeed took a configuration posted on the Archlinux forums. The menu entries I first generated with menumaker, I think with its fluxbox setting, and then used some find&replace to convert it all to jwmrc syntax. I use the Droid Sans font (installed via microlinux slackbuild).

Tweaking the menus (especially icons) is a bit of a hassle in JWM, but I like how I can customise it for other people's machines (making it as simple or complex as desired), also keeping in mind it's easy to remotely support if needed. It's also harder for a user than in let's say KDE to accidentally make a clutter of the interface elements by experimental clicking&dragging. I think that's true for icewm as well, not sure about LXQT.
I might clean up and update one of my JWM configs a bit to be able to share a usable example, I see few recent samples posted on the web.
 
Old 05-21-2016, 02:25 PM   #6
ChuangTzu
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: Where ever needed
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857
Quote:
Originally Posted by gargamel View Post
Did you have a look at Lumina Desktop?
Also still immature and incomplete like LxQT, but let's see, how the two projects get along...

gargamel
Lumina looks very interesting, and I like the idea of it being designed first for BSD then ported elsewhere. Strange thing though, I could only manage it in BSD environment, when built for Slackware it would spike CPU to 100%, and was buggy...random freezes for no reason. I couldn't figure out why it would spike CPU, so I always removed the package and made a mental not to try a later/newer version.

Keeping an eye on it though as it does look promising. Works well with PCBSD.
 
Old 05-21-2016, 02:27 PM   #7
ChuangTzu
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: Where ever needed
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857
Quote:
Originally Posted by heyjann View Post
I had heard of Lumina, but at the time I wasn't enthusiastic about mandatory fluxbox instead of the choice of window manager LX** gives. Could be to do with (preferred) licenses, Lumina coming from the BSD camp and fluxbox being MIT-licensed. But also one to keep an eye on indeed, thanks for reminding me of it.

For JWM colours&look, as a jumping-off point I indeed took a configuration posted on the Archlinux forums. The menu entries I first generated with menumaker, I think with its fluxbox setting, and then used some find&replace to convert it all to jwmrc syntax. I use the Droid Sans font (installed via microlinux slackbuild).

Tweaking the menus (especially icons) is a bit of a hassle in JWM, but I like how I can customise it for other people's machines (making it as simple or complex as desired), also keeping in mind it's easy to remotely support if needed. It's also harder for a user than in let's say KDE to accidentally make a clutter of the interface elements by experimental clicking&dragging. I think that's true for icewm as well, not sure about LXQT.
I might clean up and update one of my JWM configs a bit to be able to share a usable example, I see few recent samples posted on the web.
Definitely post here if you don't mind, I am always willing to try out other peoples configs. Trying to play with moving the antix jwm and icewm configs to Slack box, there is an inconsistency somewhere perhaps a script needing dpkg for some reason, but they have a very nice jwm and icewm setup. Salix has a nice fluxbox setup, provides a nice menu with xdgmenumaker.
 
Old 07-12-2016, 11:43 AM   #8
Geremia
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2011
Distribution: slackware64-current
Posts: 497

Rep: Reputation: 45
Here's his slackware-current LXQT build:
https://bear.alienbase.nl/mirrors/pe...t/x86_64/lxqt/
 
Old 07-12-2016, 12:32 PM   #9
interndan
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: near Marion, Ill
Distribution: Slackware 15 64bit on Desktop Slackwarearm on Raspberry PI v1b
Posts: 381

Rep: Reputation: 38
I've been using LXDE (both 32 and 64 bit) for several years now and am quite pleased with it. How does LXQT differ, and what would be the advantages/disadvantages to switching?
 
Old 07-12-2016, 01:59 PM   #10
ChuangTzu
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: Where ever needed
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857
Quote:
Originally Posted by interndan View Post
I've been using LXDE (both 32 and 64 bit) for several years now and am quite pleased with it. How does LXQT differ, and what would be the advantages/disadvantages to switching?
You can use it as a lightweight KDE. If you want to make it a little more eye candy you can use kwin instead of openbox. All of the KDE apps run very well inside lxqt.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WICD configuration tool for LXQT Timothy Miller Linux - Desktop 6 10-08-2015 01:59 PM
Siduction KDE trying to switch to LXQT Timothy Miller Linux - Distributions 0 08-09-2015 08:45 PM
ExTiX 15.2 LXQt Screencast and Screenshots jeremy Linux - Screencasts and Screenshots 0 04-19-2015 07:47 PM
LXer: How-To: Install LXQt in Ubuntu 14.04 and 14.10 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-09-2014 05:42 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration