LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2017, 09:45 AM   #16
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247

I'll tell you something: these "reputable specialists" are simply meteorologists, who have gone out of hungry inventing something stupid, but of effect.

The Earth goes through heating and cooling cycles. For billions of years. Next on is an Ice Age, on thousand years.

And it will continue like this, another billion years, when it will become like Venus, due to the Sun's rise...
 
Old 07-07-2017, 09:54 AM   #17
wpeckham
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2010
Location: Continental USA
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, RedHat, DSL, Puppy, CentOS, Knoppix, Mint-DE, Sparky, VSIDO, tinycore, Q4OS,Manjaro
Posts: 5,587

Rep: Reputation: 2687Reputation: 2687Reputation: 2687Reputation: 2687Reputation: 2687Reputation: 2687Reputation: 2687Reputation: 2687Reputation: 2687Reputation: 2687Reputation: 2687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Vader View Post
I'll tell you something: these "reputable specialists" are simply meteorologists, who have gone out of hungry inventing something stupid, but of effect.

The Earth goes through heating and cooling cycles. For billions of years. Next on is an Ice Age, on thousand years.

And it will continue like this, another billion years, when it will become like Venus, due to the Sun's rise...
No, the earth has not gone through this kind of change anytime in the last 4 million years at least.
Check out this page http://www.popsci.com/xkcd-earth-ave...imeline#page-3 or the referenced XKCD page for a graphic illustration.
 
Old 07-07-2017, 09:59 AM   #18
RadicalDreamer
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2016
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware64-Current
Posts: 1,816

Rep: Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981
Wow Unity desktop environment used the most ram. RIP
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-07-2017, 10:01 AM   #19
orbea
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,950

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Seems Darth Vader doesn't quite understand that such environmental devastation as clear cutting tropical rainforests or the use of CFCs to name a few examples has on the climate and ecosystems. Anyways, this topic is about ram, not environmental science. So I will add that I'm glad slackware was not included in such a silly list.
 
Old 07-07-2017, 11:34 AM   #20
bassmadrigal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,792

Rep: Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656
Well, this topic devolved quickly...
 
Old 07-07-2017, 01:11 PM   #21
michaelk
Moderator
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 25,676

Rep: Reputation: 5892Reputation: 5892Reputation: 5892Reputation: 5892Reputation: 5892Reputation: 5892Reputation: 5892Reputation: 5892Reputation: 5892Reputation: 5892Reputation: 5892
Quote:
Do not post if you do not have anything constructive to say in the post.
Stay on topic or the thread will be closed...
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-07-2017, 01:37 PM   #22
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,600

Rep: Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083
Darth Vader, please refrain from derailing technical threads moving forward. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me directly.

--jeremy
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-07-2017, 02:18 PM   #23
travis82
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2014
Distribution: Bedrock
Posts: 437

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231
Glad to see many environmental scientists here.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-07-2017, 09:32 PM   #24
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,973

Rep: Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623
Might a delete of posts improve this thread?
 
Old 07-07-2017, 10:56 PM   #25
tazza
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 114

Rep: Reputation: 31
Given those figures I must have stuffed something up somewhere along the line. Although I've disabled all I can and haven't enabled any additional services.

htop shows 1.24GB used - slack 14.2, KDE. Firefox, Terminal, Dolphin, and Skype running.

Firefox: ~315MB
Web: ~256
Plasma Desktop: ~86MB
Skypeforlinux: ~38MB

Ouch.
 
Old 07-07-2017, 11:46 PM   #26
orbea
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,950

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Its worth remembering that some programs like firefox will use more ram if its available.
 
Old 07-08-2017, 01:05 AM   #27
tazza
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 114

Rep: Reputation: 31
True - but even straight after booting I've noticed Slackware uses a fair bit more resources than Debian.

It's a moot point really anyway, it seems heaps snappier even with KDE/plasma. I should have switched years ago.
 
Old 07-08-2017, 01:35 AM   #28
orbea
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,950

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Like others said, that is the result of the software and hardware being run, not the distro. As you demonstrated, its easy to change out the default desktop environment or even using just a window manager. Slackware includes several choices out of the box and there are even more ready to be built at SBo. Personally I use a minimal tiling wm (Spectrwm) and my desktop experience is quite fast.
 
Old 07-08-2017, 02:45 AM   #29
tazza
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 114

Rep: Reputation: 31
Well as I said, it seems faster than my old Deb install even using KDE so it's no wonder something like Fluxbox, XFCE or yes Spectrwm would be faster still

I don't know what other services I can get rid of. So far the only rc's loaded at boot (ignoring rc.S etc) are acpid, alsa, cgproxy, cgmanager, consolekit, firewallrules, fuse, gpm, and the logging deamons and udev. I've disabled execute permissions on all the others.

Last edited by tazza; 07-08-2017 at 02:49 AM.
 
Old 07-08-2017, 03:21 AM   #30
orbea
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2015
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,950

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
If you're interested in monitoring your memory usage, I found this python script with a quick search.

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pi...ster/ps_mem.py
https://askubuntu.com/questions/9642...ge/62351#62351

It prints out the memory usage by program, for example.
Code:
 Private  +   Shared  =  RAM used	Program

  4.0 KiB +  14.5 KiB =  18.5 KiB	inetd
  4.0 KiB +  14.5 KiB =  18.5 KiB	haveged
  4.0 KiB +  24.0 KiB =  28.0 KiB	startx
  4.0 KiB +  27.5 KiB =  31.5 KiB	xinit
 12.0 KiB +  20.5 KiB =  32.5 KiB	cgmanager
  8.0 KiB +  36.0 KiB =  44.0 KiB	sshd
  0.0 KiB +  46.0 KiB =  46.0 KiB	sh (2)
  4.0 KiB +  45.0 KiB =  49.0 KiB	guix-daemon
  8.0 KiB +  48.0 KiB =  56.0 KiB	dbus-launch
  8.0 KiB +  48.5 KiB =  56.5 KiB	dmenu-bind.sh (2)
 36.0 KiB +  20.5 KiB =  56.5 KiB	atd
 48.0 KiB +  14.0 KiB =  62.0 KiB	init
 48.0 KiB +  15.5 KiB =  63.5 KiB	gpm
 80.0 KiB +  13.0 KiB =  93.0 KiB	klogd
 20.0 KiB +  82.5 KiB = 102.5 KiB	console-kit-daemon
100.0 KiB +  20.0 KiB = 120.0 KiB	syslogd
 88.0 KiB +  34.5 KiB = 122.5 KiB	yeahconsole
 20.0 KiB + 107.5 KiB = 127.5 KiB	polkitd
124.0 KiB +  18.0 KiB = 142.0 KiB	acpid
 40.0 KiB + 117.5 KiB = 157.5 KiB	agetty (5)
124.0 KiB +  40.5 KiB = 164.5 KiB	crond
 92.0 KiB + 137.5 KiB = 229.5 KiB	tmux: client
  8.0 KiB + 230.5 KiB = 238.5 KiB	script-fu
188.0 KiB +  65.0 KiB = 253.0 KiB	xbindkeys
272.0 KiB +  82.5 KiB = 354.5 KiB	tee
400.0 KiB +  33.5 KiB = 433.5 KiB	dhcpcd
324.0 KiB + 183.5 KiB = 507.5 KiB	at-spi-bus-launcher
568.0 KiB +  72.5 KiB = 640.5 KiB	ntpd
452.0 KiB + 233.0 KiB = 685.0 KiB	at-spi2-registryd
588.0 KiB + 176.0 KiB = 764.0 KiB	tmux: server
592.0 KiB + 266.0 KiB = 858.0 KiB	dbus-daemon (3)
856.0 KiB + 225.0 KiB =   1.1 MiB	gpg-agent
  1.5 MiB +  96.0 KiB =   1.5 MiB	udevd
  1.3 MiB + 412.5 KiB =   1.7 MiB	xscreensaver
  1.7 MiB + 328.5 KiB =   2.0 MiB	gnome-keyring-daemon
  1.7 MiB + 719.5 KiB =   2.4 MiB	dunst
  1.8 MiB + 713.5 KiB =   2.5 MiB	ssh
  3.0 MiB + 259.5 KiB =   3.2 MiB	spectrwm
  3.7 MiB + 849.0 KiB =   4.5 MiB	ripperX
  6.6 MiB +   1.8 MiB =   8.4 MiB	bash (11)
 25.6 MiB + 448.0 KiB =  26.0 MiB	rtorrent main
 26.1 MiB +   1.1 MiB =  27.2 MiB	emacs-25.2-with-x11
 28.2 MiB +   1.3 MiB =  29.5 MiB	urxvtd
 37.4 MiB +   3.8 MiB =  41.2 MiB	gimp-2.8
 43.2 MiB +   6.6 MiB =  49.8 MiB	deadbeef-gtkui
 36.1 MiB +  33.0 MiB =  69.1 MiB	Xorg
 77.2 MiB +   1.5 MiB =  78.7 MiB	gdb
 65.0 MiB +  15.6 MiB =  80.6 MiB	mpsyt (2)
100.3 MiB + 252.5 KiB = 100.6 MiB	autocutsel (2)
412.8 MiB +   5.1 MiB = 417.8 MiB	spacefm
414.4 MiB +   6.6 MiB = 421.0 MiB	dolphin-emu
  1.1 GiB +  34.9 MiB =   1.1 GiB	firefox
---------------------------------
                          2.4 GiB
That said, I think if you have the ram to use you may as well use it.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAM consumption by Gcore dipanchatterjee Linux - Newbie 6 01-15-2017 02:52 PM
[Xfce] Some processes are spawned multiple times, high RAM consumption Nh3xus Slackware 7 12-26-2013 09:29 PM
Slackware14-64 Internet is very slow in comparison to other Linux distros. WhiteyMcQ-Tip Slackware 3 03-21-2013 06:43 PM
[SOLVED] Linux distros comparison (stability, speed, security) alanv Linux - Newbie 24 11-09-2010 11:23 PM
SUSE- reduce ram consumption MTBer Linux - Software 7 04-14-2006 10:21 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration