SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've often thought of Slackware like a modern Morgan Roadster. For those not familiar, Morgan is a small British car company that still makes a design similar to 40s and 50s roadsters like the MG TC or TD. However, they have modern materials, manufacturing methods, and amenities. They are indeed "consciously retro" but they are intended for those that appreciate older ways of doing things. It's a philosophy of "improve without changing" that I think is analogous to how Slackware is developed.
For another less "consciously retro" car analogy, consider the Porsche 911. It is essentially the same car it has been since 1964, simply freshened and modernized every few years. Anyone can instantly recognize the car no matter what year, but it keeps getting better with every iteration.
If every driver in the world was given a free 911, I can guarantee you that a large majority of them would want their Camry back. A 911 makes sacrifices in comfort and convenience for performance and driver control. Most 911 owners wouldn't have it any other way, but the experience isn't for everyone.
Oddly, any car reviewer will understand a 911 for what it is, and it is brilliant at that. In a 911 review, you wouldn't complain about how much more cargo space an SUV has, or how it doesn't ride as smoothly as a Lexus. For some reason, Slackware reviewers simply can't see the differences between it and the now more mainstream distros. They want to compare it on terms that aren't really relevant to why someone chooses to run Slackware in the first place.
That was beautiful. I've been distro-hopping between Arch Linux, FreeBSD, and Slackware, and now I've decided. Slackware is for me! I'm coming home!
Thank you. Slackware tends to suit a certain mentality. Before I knew it well enough to use it full time, I still sensed a "rightness" about it that other distros didn't have. There was an internal order that just seemed easier to grasp. If you have that same sense about Slackware, give yourself time to climb the learning curve. At some point things just click into place and you'll start to understand why Slackware does a lot of things differently than other distros. Slackware's stability is no accident, or a random side effect. It's a direct consequence of a lot of the design decisions that make it appear "retro" compared to the repository-based distros.
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,086
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpelledJ
....If every driver in the world was given a free 911, I can guarantee you that a large majority of them would want their Camry back. A 911 makes sacrifices in comfort and convenience for performance and driver control. Most 911 owners wouldn't have it any other way, but the experience isn't for everyone.
Oddly, any car reviewer will understand a 911 for what it is, and it is brilliant at that. In a 911 review, you wouldn't complain about how much more cargo space an SUV has, or how it doesn't ride as smoothly as a Lexus. For some reason, Slackware reviewers simply can't see the differences between it and the now more mainstream distros. They want to compare it on terms that aren't really relevant to why someone chooses to run Slackware in the first place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by foodown
This is an elegant and apt metaphor. I like it.
Agreed!
Last edited by cwizardone; 06-18-2010 at 11:35 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.