LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-02-2010, 02:58 PM   #16
gegechris99
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware 15.0 64bit
Posts: 1,159
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 392Reputation: 392Reputation: 392Reputation: 392

Quote:
Originally Posted by T3slider View Post
Here you go. Only in 64-bit Slackware from the looks of it.
OK, I get it. Only Slackware64

Could it be that the reviewer tested Slackware64?
 
Old 06-18-2010, 05:06 PM   #17
agi93
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 101

Rep: Reputation: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpelledJ View Post
I've often thought of Slackware like a modern Morgan Roadster. For those not familiar, Morgan is a small British car company that still makes a design similar to 40s and 50s roadsters like the MG TC or TD. However, they have modern materials, manufacturing methods, and amenities. They are indeed "consciously retro" but they are intended for those that appreciate older ways of doing things. It's a philosophy of "improve without changing" that I think is analogous to how Slackware is developed.

For another less "consciously retro" car analogy, consider the Porsche 911. It is essentially the same car it has been since 1964, simply freshened and modernized every few years. Anyone can instantly recognize the car no matter what year, but it keeps getting better with every iteration.

If every driver in the world was given a free 911, I can guarantee you that a large majority of them would want their Camry back. A 911 makes sacrifices in comfort and convenience for performance and driver control. Most 911 owners wouldn't have it any other way, but the experience isn't for everyone.

Oddly, any car reviewer will understand a 911 for what it is, and it is brilliant at that. In a 911 review, you wouldn't complain about how much more cargo space an SUV has, or how it doesn't ride as smoothly as a Lexus. For some reason, Slackware reviewers simply can't see the differences between it and the now more mainstream distros. They want to compare it on terms that aren't really relevant to why someone chooses to run Slackware in the first place.
That was beautiful. I've been distro-hopping between Arch Linux, FreeBSD, and Slackware, and now I've decided. Slackware is for me! I'm coming home!
 
Old 06-18-2010, 09:35 PM   #18
SpelledJ
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, AL
Distribution: Slackware64-13.1, 12.1
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: 20
Thank you. Slackware tends to suit a certain mentality. Before I knew it well enough to use it full time, I still sensed a "rightness" about it that other distros didn't have. There was an internal order that just seemed easier to grasp. If you have that same sense about Slackware, give yourself time to climb the learning curve. At some point things just click into place and you'll start to understand why Slackware does a lot of things differently than other distros. Slackware's stability is no accident, or a random side effect. It's a direct consequence of a lot of the design decisions that make it appear "retro" compared to the repository-based distros.
 
Old 06-18-2010, 11:33 PM   #19
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,086

Rep: Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpelledJ View Post
....If every driver in the world was given a free 911, I can guarantee you that a large majority of them would want their Camry back. A 911 makes sacrifices in comfort and convenience for performance and driver control. Most 911 owners wouldn't have it any other way, but the experience isn't for everyone.

Oddly, any car reviewer will understand a 911 for what it is, and it is brilliant at that. In a 911 review, you wouldn't complain about how much more cargo space an SUV has, or how it doesn't ride as smoothly as a Lexus. For some reason, Slackware reviewers simply can't see the differences between it and the now more mainstream distros. They want to compare it on terms that aren't really relevant to why someone chooses to run Slackware in the first place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by foodown View Post
This is an elegant and apt metaphor. I like it.
Agreed!

Last edited by cwizardone; 06-18-2010 at 11:35 PM.
 
Old 06-19-2010, 10:36 PM   #20
CesarLG
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Distribution: Slackware 12.1
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 0
I think it's more like the Millenium Falcon...
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Review of Slackware 13. cwizardone Slackware 74 11-10-2009 07:40 PM
Slackware Review 12.1 todders Slackware 63 06-13-2008 05:52 PM
Review of Slackware 12.1 symatic Slackware 58 05-11-2008 01:01 PM
My slackware 12 review bird603568 Slackware 12 07-27-2007 11:19 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration