Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
10-23-2003, 06:18 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Slackware-Current and Salix 14.2
Posts: 274
Rep:
|
large partition decreases performance?
Hello,
I installed slack 9.1 yesterday.
I've got a question on the partition size. Currently i have 18 GB reserved for /
also have a 1GB swap, and another partition for big data. I have no seperate partitions for /home, or other directories. All partitions are formated with EXT3.
Will a large / partition decrease the overal performance? since only 2.6 GB is used on that partition. Also.. i was thinking of imaging the / partition. But i think when i make a ghost image, that image will be enormous.
Another question is.. would it be better to reinstall, with seperate /home, smaller /, and perhaps other partitions?
i am still thinking of a better backup strategy.. so making a 1 or 2GB /home partition might not be a bad idea.
Perhaps you can give me some answers.
Thanks
|
|
|
10-23-2003, 10:55 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: May 2003
Location: Lisbon Falls, Maine
Distribution: RH 8.0, 9.0, FC2 - 4, Slack 9.0 - 10.2, Knoppix 3.4 - 4.0, LFS,
Posts: 789
Rep:
|
You shouldn't see much (if any) of a performance difference. EXT3 does not become fragmented (at least not nearly as much as Fat32 or NTFS) so it is no less efficient to have a smaller or larger partition. I DO think you're wasting some space though. Unless you plan to DO something with all of that space (i.e. save all your source trees under /usr/src or something ) then it probably wont get used, at least not if you're like me and save 90% of your stuff in /home.
slight
|
|
|
10-23-2003, 12:23 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2003
Location: Malaysia
Distribution: Slackware, LFS, CentOS
Posts: 1,307
Rep:
|
Good God... why would you need a gig of swap?
|
|
|
10-23-2003, 01:20 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: May 2003
Location: Lisbon Falls, Maine
Distribution: RH 8.0, 9.0, FC2 - 4, Slack 9.0 - 10.2, Knoppix 3.4 - 4.0, LFS,
Posts: 789
Rep:
|
Probably following the 2x rule, if you have 512MB of RAM then you need 512X2 for swap.
Although, I rarely if ever hit my swap, and I only have 256MB RAM.
A gig does seem a bit overkill.
slight
|
|
|
10-23-2003, 01:41 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu / Mac OS X
Posts: 5
Rep:
|
I have a gig of swap, but only to match the gig of RAM the machine has running behind it.
|
|
|
10-23-2003, 02:43 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: right behind the moon
Distribution: gentoo
Posts: 466
Rep:
|
oh damn i whish i can one day have such a computer but its soo expensive ...
|
|
|
10-23-2003, 04:14 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: NewZealand
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 146
Rep:
|
My server has 512MB ECC ram, I only allocated a 100MB for the swap partition, seems to run fine.
|
|
|
10-24-2003, 10:29 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Slackware-Current and Salix 14.2
Posts: 274
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for the tips.
i installed slack again. Becomming real handy in it now . have made different partitions. 1.2 GB /home, 14 GB /, 25 GB /bigdata, 1 GB swap
Why i am using the 1GB swap? wel, because i read everywhere, and also a poster wrote it, that you have to take twice your memory. and i have 512 mb. Also, i am a multi-tasker.. use 4 desktops.. and fully.. with office aps.. internet apps, multimedia, and..... VMware.. which is a huge memory eater.. (depending on your configs)
i need vmware because for work i have to work a lot with MS access. So winXP install within vmware.
i seperated the /home dir because it's more easy to backup with a linux disc imaging tool, and that will just fit (compressed) on one cd rewritable.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|