LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-23-2003, 06:18 AM   #1
deNiro
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Slackware-Current and Salix 14.2
Posts: 274
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Question large partition decreases performance?


Hello,

I installed slack 9.1 yesterday.

I've got a question on the partition size. Currently i have 18 GB reserved for /
also have a 1GB swap, and another partition for big data. I have no seperate partitions for /home, or other directories. All partitions are formated with EXT3.

Will a large / partition decrease the overal performance? since only 2.6 GB is used on that partition. Also.. i was thinking of imaging the / partition. But i think when i make a ghost image, that image will be enormous.

Another question is.. would it be better to reinstall, with seperate /home, smaller /, and perhaps other partitions?

i am still thinking of a better backup strategy.. so making a 1 or 2GB /home partition might not be a bad idea.

Perhaps you can give me some answers.

Thanks
 
Old 10-23-2003, 10:55 AM   #2
slightcrazed
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Lisbon Falls, Maine
Distribution: RH 8.0, 9.0, FC2 - 4, Slack 9.0 - 10.2, Knoppix 3.4 - 4.0, LFS,
Posts: 789

Rep: Reputation: 30
You shouldn't see much (if any) of a performance difference. EXT3 does not become fragmented (at least not nearly as much as Fat32 or NTFS) so it is no less efficient to have a smaller or larger partition. I DO think you're wasting some space though. Unless you plan to DO something with all of that space (i.e. save all your source trees under /usr/src or something ) then it probably wont get used, at least not if you're like me and save 90% of your stuff in /home.

slight
 
Old 10-23-2003, 12:23 PM   #3
Azmeen
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Malaysia
Distribution: Slackware, LFS, CentOS
Posts: 1,307

Rep: Reputation: 47
Good God... why would you need a gig of swap?
 
Old 10-23-2003, 01:20 PM   #4
slightcrazed
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Lisbon Falls, Maine
Distribution: RH 8.0, 9.0, FC2 - 4, Slack 9.0 - 10.2, Knoppix 3.4 - 4.0, LFS,
Posts: 789

Rep: Reputation: 30
Probably following the 2x rule, if you have 512MB of RAM then you need 512X2 for swap.

Although, I rarely if ever hit my swap, and I only have 256MB RAM.

A gig does seem a bit overkill.

slight
 
Old 10-23-2003, 01:41 PM   #5
spacejunk
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu / Mac OS X
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
I have a gig of swap, but only to match the gig of RAM the machine has running behind it.
 
Old 10-23-2003, 02:43 PM   #6
kasperhans
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: right behind the moon
Distribution: gentoo
Posts: 466

Rep: Reputation: 30
oh damn i whish i can one day have such a computer but its soo expensive ...
 
Old 10-23-2003, 04:14 PM   #7
Streams
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: NewZealand
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 146

Rep: Reputation: 15
My server has 512MB ECC ram, I only allocated a 100MB for the swap partition, seems to run fine.
 
Old 10-24-2003, 10:29 AM   #8
deNiro
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Slackware-Current and Salix 14.2
Posts: 274

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Thanks for the tips.

i installed slack again. Becomming real handy in it now . have made different partitions. 1.2 GB /home, 14 GB /, 25 GB /bigdata, 1 GB swap

Why i am using the 1GB swap? wel, because i read everywhere, and also a poster wrote it, that you have to take twice your memory. and i have 512 mb. Also, i am a multi-tasker.. use 4 desktops.. and fully.. with office aps.. internet apps, multimedia, and..... VMware.. which is a huge memory eater.. (depending on your configs)

i need vmware because for work i have to work a lot with MS access. So winXP install within vmware.

i seperated the /home dir because it's more easy to backup with a linux disc imaging tool, and that will just fit (compressed) on one cd rewritable.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Large Partition greencat SUSE / openSUSE 1 04-25-2005 04:53 PM
Samba performance problem (large network) help!?! mdreeling Linux - General 2 11-29-2004 05:03 AM
Help! Splitting 1 large partition into 3! sh1ft Linux - Hardware 2 06-30-2004 10:04 AM
Why such a large boot partition? nugui Linux - Newbie 3 11-13-2003 08:21 PM
hdparm decreases performance buddhahat Linux - Newbie 1 11-07-2003 11:10 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration