LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2004, 08:39 AM   #1
KMcD
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slack -- current
Posts: 354

Rep: Reputation: 30
kernel upgrade -- bug??


Hi.

I've been playing with the new 2.4.25 kernel and have got it up and running. I then tried to apply the acpi patch from http://acpi.sourceforge.net/ and recompile the kernel. Now I get the following when I boot (this is a section from dmesg)

uhci.c: USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver v1.1
kernel BUG at slab.c:815!
invalid operand: 0000
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[<c013535b>] Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010246
eax: 00000000 ebx: c15c4174 ecx: c15c4a74 edx: c15c4980
esi: c15c497a edi: dc81b9f6 ebp: c15c42d4 esp: db78decc
ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Process modprobe (pid: 95, stackpage=db78d000)
Stack: c15c4174 0000003c 00000000 db78dee4 c15c4194 fffffffc 00000034 fffffff4
00000000 00000000 ffffffea dc81b298 dc81b9e8 0000003c 00000080 00000000
00000000 00000000 dc816000 c011c6d4 dc816060 0809d010 000069fc 00000000
Call Trace: [<dc81b298>] [<dc81b9e8>] [<c011c6d4>] [<dc816060>] [<dc816060>]
[<c01075cf>]

Code: 0f 0b 2f 03 79 b4 35 c0 8b 01 89 ca 89 c1 0f 18 00 81 fa 6c
<6>eth0: Autonegotiation advertising 0x5e1 partner 0x00.
eth0: link down.
eth0: Autonegotiation advertising 0x5e1 partner 0x41e1.
eth0: link up.

Everything seems to work fine but I am concerned about the presence of "kernel BUG" and the segmentation error. I don't know enough about linux to interprate this. I'd appreciate anyone's insight.

Also, the first time I compiled the new kernel I didn't run 'make clean'. My old configuration was untouched, which is what I wanted. The second time I did run 'make clean' and now my old configuration for the 2.4.20 kernel was changed. Is there anyway to undo this. I liked having the security of a backup kernel.
 
Old 03-10-2004, 08:43 AM   #2
carboncopy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 1,210
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 45
If you don't need acpid. Don't compile it into the kernel/module.

I found out that it interfer with my BigMem option which causes kernel panic and dump the contents of the CPU reg like what you posted. And my machine wasn't all that stable.

With acpi off. My system is rock stable.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Upgrade to 2.6 kernels -> quake3 little bug blubz Linux - Software 0 11-15-2004 04:48 AM
KDE 3.2 bug -> fix or upgrade? LJT Linux - Software 2 10-14-2004 02:59 AM
Kernel 2.6 bug?!! oldi Slackware 1 05-30-2004 02:26 PM
Bug#227357 Debian upgrade Woody -> Sarge, Apache broken llamakc Debian 3 01-28-2004 04:14 PM
a bug maybe in the new kernel 2.4.19? Frustin Linux - General 2 08-06-2002 04:20 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration