Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
09-13-2004, 10:48 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 8
Rep:
|
Kernel 2.6.x....is it worth it?
Is it any trouble to upgrade the kernel to 2.6.x? If so, then is it worth it?
|
|
|
09-13-2004, 11:46 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: OpenSuse 10.x
Posts: 262
Rep:
|
IMHO, the least troublesome (at least from what I heard) 2.4.x > 2.6.x upgrade path is to install 2.6.7 packages from the Slackware 10, CD2, /testing folder.
Benefits (from what i experienced)
- New USB mice magically start working in X by themselves.
- The system is more responsive in desktop environment. (It's not faster in itself, but the reaction to you clicks and button presses is more instantaneous)
- More/better drivers for new hardware. (In my case: Flash card reader and Bluetooth usb adaptor)
Problems
- Some devices don't "just work" as they should because there is no entry in /dev for them because UDev and HotPlug in 2.6.x don't know what to do with them. UDev and Hotplug still does not support well parport, some usb devices.
Most people switch to 2.6.x either:
- because they are bored out of their mind with a Slackware that "just works" out of the box, and their hands twitch to tweak, or
- because they need support for some new hardware.
|
|
|
09-13-2004, 12:40 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Brasil
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,037
Rep:
|
hi there,
just to attach some more information, if you upgrade to 2.6.x ALSA can be a bit tricky..
there is good docu in slack cd2..
regards
slackie1000
|
|
|
09-13-2004, 12:52 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Houston,Texas
Distribution: Via Debian!!!
Posts: 113
Rep:
|
Would I be correct in assuming that 2.4 is more stable than 2.6?
|
|
|
09-13-2004, 01:10 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: OpenSuse 10.x
Posts: 262
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by alioop
Would I be correct in assuming that 2.4 is more stable than 2.6?
|
I'd say the kernels themselves are generally equally stable. What is not as stable is the stuff that grows around kernels - like UDev, Hotplug, USBfs, other fs drivers, scripts, configs. Things are much more settled down around 2.4, pretty much everything that should work - works. I had to create my own parport-device-creating HotPlug/Udev scripts to make parport printer work on 2.6., for example. That level of problems (or lack of complication) is just not there on 2.4.x.
On the other hand... www.kernel.org is now on 2.6.x... So, it all depends on your "needs/tasks" when deciding if 2.6.x is solid enough.
As for ALSA, I think switching to 2.6.x actually made it easier for me to make it work. It is a part of kernel now. All i did is select appropriate modules, did my kernel and alsaconf, alsamixer. Worked like a charm. (I have very generic sound card though, (SB AWE64 ISA) so mileage may differ.)
Last edited by suslik; 09-13-2004 at 01:14 PM.
|
|
|
09-13-2004, 01:51 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Brasil
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,037
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by suslik
As for ALSA, I think switching to 2.6.x actually made it easier for me to make it work. It is a part of kernel now. All i did is select appropriate modules, did my kernel and alsaconf, alsamixer. Worked like a charm. (I have very generic sound card though, (SB AWE64 ISA) so mileage may differ.)
|
that is it..
can be tricky..
in slack you see that they left also the ALSA libraries together in CD2. For onboard sound, intel8x0 SIS ,etc can bring some headache
also the information at www.alsa-project.org is a bit outdated(if you consider the kernel 2.6.x) for this hardware.
regards
slackie1000
|
|
|
04-03-2006, 09:50 AM
|
#7
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2005
Distribution: Slackware 12.2
Posts: 13
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by suslik
... I had to create my own parport-device-creating HotPlug/Udev scripts to make parport printer work on 2.6., for example...
|
Would you elaborate on that. I cannot get HotPlug/Udev to work with my parport printer, and I would be grateful to see how you have done it. Especially if it is done elegantly
Thanks in advance
kris_kiil
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|