LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-10-2006, 05:32 PM   #1
weilmd
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Is Slackware for me?


SYSOP has Redhat installed at work. I mostly use the GUI, and leave technical stuff to him. I am currently an XP user, graduating through the ranks from DOS3. I've installed Ubuntu and played there a bit, but had some problems. An IM user on Ubuntu channel suggested downloading Slax live to see what happened. Sha-Bang! Up it booted, looked easy to use. Thought I'd install Slax on the HD, but found Slackware recommended. Using a PIII-650/128M machine, so not a lot of power to spare.

I noted Ubuntu loaded very easy. Is it the same w/Slackware?

Thanks
 
Old 06-10-2006, 05:51 PM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
clearly not an intro. moved to Slackware.
 
Old 06-10-2006, 06:14 PM   #3
drkstr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, WA: USA
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 1,191

Rep: Reputation: 45
Slackware can be configured to many different types of machines. I have it running great on a PII 400Mhz w/ 128mb RAM, which has a light weight windows manager and is configured to not load up extra stuff that I will not need. On the filp side of that, I also use it on my P-IV 2.8Ghz w/ 1Gb RAM with the KDE window manager and all the fancy eye candy. Slackware is what you make it, that's why I like it.

regards,
...drkstr
 
Old 06-10-2006, 09:07 PM   #4
rkelsen
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,703
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 2796Reputation: 2796Reputation: 2796Reputation: 2796Reputation: 2796Reputation: 2796Reputation: 2796Reputation: 2796Reputation: 2796Reputation: 2796Reputation: 2796
As someone who grew up with DOS, much like yourself, I have found using Slackware to be an extremely liberating and empowering experience. It doesn't hold your hand. It stays out of your way and returns control of your computer to you. Tip: If you can't figure out how to do something in Slackware, then you're "over-thinking" the problem. There's a simple solution to everything in Slackware.
 
Old 06-10-2006, 10:04 PM   #5
masonm
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,300

Rep: Reputation: 90
It really depends. If you're willing to spend a little time learning Slack is great. If you expect the OS to hold your hand then I'd have to say no.

The best advice I can give is to install it and try it with the understanding that you will likely have to spend some time learning how it works.

BTW, what problems did you have with Ubuntu?
 
Old 06-10-2006, 10:05 PM   #6
cwwilson721
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: In my house.
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10 64bit, Slackware 13.1 64-bit
Posts: 2,649
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 67
To expand a little on rknelson:

Search the Slackware forum here at LQ.

Odds are, your issue will not be unique. But if that still doesn't resolve it, post a question.

You'll find the main reason Slackware rocks is:

THIS FORUM AND ITS PEOPLE
 
Old 06-10-2006, 11:43 PM   #7
weilmd
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks to all. I am a computer "user" and not really a programmer. My main reason for going to Linux is to get away from MS. I am, I suppose, looking for some handholding, only because I do not have a lot of time to completely learn a new OS. When I loaded Ubuntu, I did have to go to the help forums to get the ethernet card to work. One of the help folks suggested trying Slax just to see if it was a hardware problem, of software configuration. The live CD worked wonderfully, almost like a miracle. Thus, I thought I'd give Slackware consideration. But honestly, I don't think I can afford to build a new machine piece by piece (software)...I'm just not that good.

Of course, if there is a GOOD and easy "Slackware for Dummies" book...

Is there a linux distro that can work pretty good "out of the box"?
 
Old 06-10-2006, 11:57 PM   #8
masonm
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,300

Rep: Reputation: 90
Honestly these days there is very little hardware that won't work in Linux, you just may have to get your hand dirty to get there. If you can be a little more specific we can probably steer you in the right direction.
 
Old 06-11-2006, 12:19 AM   #9
Z038
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 912

Rep: Reputation: 174Reputation: 174
I tried RedHat through many versions, then Fedora core 2, 3, and 4, and Debian, then finally Slackware. I sampled a few other Linux distros briefly. Let me tell you that you don't need to be a programmer to get the most out of Slackware. You do have to be willing to think and do some independent research and ask questions (this forum is the best place to ask) and to experiment a little now and then. Maybe. It depends on your hardware and what you want to do with your software. You might need to spend a little more time configuring certain things than you would with some of the other distros. You might spend a little more time at the command line. I'll be honest and say that you may run into frustrating brick walls now and then, especially in some areas where Windows effectively isolates you from all pain (e.g., sound, video), but that's really true of any Linux system since none of them are like Windows.

I had a couple of objectives for migrating to Linux besides just wanting to get away from MS Windows, but that was certainly part of it. If you really want to get away from MS Windows, you are going to have to spend some time learning a new OS. Some distros might be a little easier at first than some others, but what you may sacrifice for that ease to one degree or another is the knowledge and familiarity with the OS that will enable you to be in control of your system. Isn't that knowledge worth spending a little effort to acquire.

If you really don't want to learn a new OS and you don't care to know how to configure it to make it serve your needs best, then by all means, go with a distro that isolates you from your system, keeps you from knowing it, and holds your hand like MS Windows; one that keeps you floating miles atop your architecture like a flimsy raft traversing the ocean in the vicinity of the Mariana Trench. It'll still accomplish your stated objective. But if you want to exercise greater control of your system and understand why it works, go with a distro that is rock-solid and capable of serving your needs, whatever they may be. That would be Slackware.

Having said all that, Ubuntu is said to be a fine distribution. Nothing wrong with going that route if it suits your needs better.

Last edited by Z038; 06-11-2006 at 12:22 AM.
 
Old 06-11-2006, 12:40 AM   #10
Z038
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 912

Rep: Reputation: 174Reputation: 174
I had a '69 Ford pickup truck years ago. The engine was made out of cast iron, a common type of heavy metal back then , with a few rubber hoses and some belts here and there. It ran like a top, it was solid as a rock, it was difficult to break, and it was dirt simple to work on. That's how I think of Slackware.

The alternative is a distro that has a flimsy aluminum manifold, lots of plastic parts and mysterious black boxes, a bewildering mess of rubber hoses and belts, and bothersome protective shrouds everywhere. You void the warranty if you so much as open the hood, much less take a wrench to it.

Not the greatest analogy, I guess, but I sure like the heavy metal cast iron block that came with my Slackware distro.
 
Old 06-11-2006, 12:50 AM   #11
J.W.
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 87
"Is Slackware for me?"

You'll never know unless you try it....
 
Old 06-11-2006, 12:50 AM   #12
Ruhar
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: Slackware 12.1
Posts: 95

Rep: Reputation: 15
Maybe try out Ubuntu for a while to get your feet wet. As soon as you start using linux more you might start to really get into it and want to learn more. Maybe, at that point, check out Slackware. Like it has been said before, Slack can be whatever you make of it. Once you spend some time with Slackware you may really start to appreciate the power and control you have over your system...
Good luck...
 
Old 06-11-2006, 01:17 AM   #13
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z038
I had a '69 Ford pickup truck years ago. The engine was made out of cast iron, a common type of heavy metal back then :), with a few rubber hoses and some belts here and there. It ran like a top, it was solid as a rock, it was difficult to break, and it was dirt simple to work on. That's how I think of Slackware.

The alternative is a distro that has a flimsy aluminum manifold, lots of plastic parts and mysterious black boxes, a bewildering mess of rubber hoses and belts, and bothersome protective shrouds everywhere. You void the warranty if you so much as open the hood, much less take a wrench to it.

Not the greatest analogy, I guess, but I sure like the heavy metal cast iron block that came with my Slackware distro.
I very much like your analogy :}

Back in the days I could jumps-start my car when the battery
ran flat by pushing it, and slamming it into 2nd gear. With the
current vehicle this is impossible; I need someone with cables
and time to get it going :}


Cheers,
Tink
 
Old 06-11-2006, 01:24 AM   #14
prozac
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Distribution: slackware 12.1
Posts: 753

Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkelsen
As someone who grew up with DOS, much like yourself, I have found using Slackware to be an extremely liberating and empowering experience. It doesn't hold your hand. It stays out of your way and returns control of your computer to you. Tip: If you can't figure out how to do something in Slackware, then you're "over-thinking" the problem. There's a simple solution to everything in Slackware.
In my limited experience with slackware I have found the above paragraph extremely TRUE!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
About Slackware 9.1 boot disk?? ftp://ftp.kpn.be/pub/linux/slackware/slackware-9.1-is AL3OMDAH Slackware 4 04-18-2007 10:54 AM
Dual boot windows/slackware, but slackware installed first? Cryptic_K Slackware 3 11-20-2006 01:49 PM
using older slackware package for newer slackware. Is it problematic? hottdogg Slackware 2 12-13-2005 04:57 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration