LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Slackware (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/)
-   -   Is Patrick OK? (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/is-patrick-ok-4175538666/)

rkelsen 04-16-2015 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmccue (Post 5348654)
I do not understand what is up with these type threads and the "going home" announcements.

+1. No-one cares. If you really want to leave, do it... but please do it silently.

hitest 04-16-2015 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkelsen (Post 5348675)
+1. No-one cares. If you really want to leave, do it... but please do it silently.

+2. We have a winner!

ReaperX7 04-16-2015 11:20 PM

+3 Chicken dinner.

brianL 04-17-2015 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T3slider (Post 5348612)
This sounds a lot like this thread.

I'd forgotten that thread. My deja wasn't vuing. :)
We need an organization: SAFT (Slackers Against FUD Threads).

WiseDraco 04-17-2015 07:08 AM

I personally be ok with slackware, and its maangement system - without authoritary king in black smoking, or what :)

2astrogeek: all is ok? Long time not get any news from you :)

ibwew 04-17-2015 09:35 AM

The beatings will continue until morale improves !!

hitest 04-17-2015 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ibwew (Post 5348883)
The beatings will continue until morale improves !!

Avast there, matey! Yaaaarrrrrrr. :)

allend 04-17-2015 10:21 AM

Quote:

We need an organization: SAFT (Slackers Against FUD Threads).
Good luck trying to organise the silent majority.

drmozes 04-17-2015 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by allend (Post 5348914)
Good luck trying to organise the silent majority.

It wouldn't help anyway. Despite having had the Slackware team comment on what's going on, the silent majority (may?) read it but the vocal few ignore it and continue with the same noise and same answers.

Is there an forum feature to tag people who don't read the threads, so that their comments can be flagged and easily ignored ? :-)

It's worth remembering that Pat builds *two* distributions - 32bit and 64bit, so the maintenance is double.

/me goes to play around with the 32bit new -current

dugan 04-17-2015 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drmozes (Post 5348938)
It's worth remembering that Pat builds *two* distributions - 32bit and 64bit, so the maintenance is double.

Who maintains the ARM and S/390 distributions?

titopoquito 04-17-2015 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drmozes (Post 5348938)
Is there an forum feature to tag people who don't read the threads, so that their comments can be flagged and easily ignored ? :-)

You can put people on your ignore list, that's a forum feature. I see it as a kind of last resort, but consider it useful from time to time. You still can view those posts but have to allow it case by case.
Quote:

/me goes to play around with the 32bit new -current
Happy slacking :)

astrogeek 04-17-2015 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiseDraco (Post 5348808)
I personally be ok with slackware, and its maangement system - without authoritary king in black smoking, or what :)

2astrogeek: all is ok? Long time not get any news from you :)

Привет!

Agree - no authoritary king types needed!

Like our BDFL, I have been experiencing some personal downtime since January, making a slow return over last week or two. It has been my intention to write you this week - I will make good effort to do so on the weekend.

Пока!

enine 04-17-2015 04:47 PM

Pat just told me he's busy compiling Slackware x86_128 :p

pataphysician 04-17-2015 04:54 PM

So are people saying that firefox 31.5.0 ESR is a reasonably secure version of firefox to run on my 14.1 Slackware, and that there is no overly compelling reason for this to be updated.

That is, maybe some overly paranoid people might want to update, but there is a reasonable argument that there are really no compelling security risks in it.

Since Patrick is probably smarter than me and knows his distro better than me, and wouldn't let a super critical security update, that is trivially easy to build and test, since it is purely a security update and not a feature update of firefox, and traditionally Patrick has often released such fixes a day after mozilla's release, go unfixed for 28 days?

slackass 04-17-2015 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pataphysician (Post 5349111)
So are people saying that firefox 31.5.0 ESR is a reasonably secure version of firefox to run on my 14.1 Slackware, and that there is no overly compelling reason for this to be updated.

That is, maybe some overly paranoid people might want to update, but there is a reasonable argument that there are really no compelling security risks in it.

Since Patrick is probably smarter than me and knows his distro better than me, and wouldn't let a super critical security update, that is trivially easy to build and test, since it is purely a security update and not a feature update of firefox, and traditionally Patrick has often released such fixes a day after mozilla's release, go unfixed for 28 days?

A good alternative to firefox would be icecat.
http://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.1/network/icecat/
Very easy to keep icecat updated yourself and IMHO is more secure than firefox.

EDIT:
Also:
There is a slackbuild in /source/xap that you should be able to modify if you wish to update firefox.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 AM.