Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
06-15-2014, 07:36 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: May 2014
Posts: 209
Rep:
|
Install of Catalyst requirements
I had installed the Catalyst driver before, but noticed poor performance OOB. Upon finally reading the system requirements (silly me), I noticed that some packages required for optimal performance are in the current branch. If I grab some individual packages from current, stay in stable, and install those packages with installpkg, would it cause some instability?
|
|
|
06-15-2014, 08:20 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,564
|
What packages?
|
|
|
06-15-2014, 08:26 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2014
Posts: 209
Original Poster
Rep:
|
from /var/log/packages-
glibc-2.17_multilib-x86_64-7alien
glibc-i18n-2.17_multilib-x86_64-7alien
glibc-profile-2.17_multilib-x86_64-7alien
glibc-solibs-2.17_multilib-x86_64-7alien
glibc-zoneinfo-2013d_multilib-noarch-7alien
System requirements
glibc version 2.2 or 2.3
Just wondering what I can do.
|
|
|
06-15-2014, 10:55 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,564
|
Glibc comes standard with Slackware.
|
|
|
06-15-2014, 11:02 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: May 2014
Posts: 209
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Ah, I see.
|
|
|
06-16-2014, 12:06 AM
|
#6
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,179
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinonoir
If I grab some individual packages from current, stay in stable, and install those packages with installpkg, would it cause some instability?
|
It could:
- Never install a package intended for -current in a stable release. This can create instabilities or break your system. What *could* help in some cases (but could also break some other stuff if it's a core component of the system) is rebuilding a package intended for your stable version using the build material provided in the source/directory of the installation media, but with an upgraded source tarball and setting the VERSION parameter accordingly in or when running the SlackBuild.
- If you search for the glibc package here, you will see that the glibc versions are 2.17 and 2.19 for -14.1 and -current respectively. Both are fairly recent so it is highly improbable that upgrading will give you any benefit, futhermore glibc *is* a core component of the system, that's another reason not to try.
Last edited by Didier Spaier; 06-16-2014 at 03:01 AM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|