LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-24-2007, 09:24 PM   #16
overlook1977
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Distribution: Fedora 15
Posts: 68

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15

filesystem is ext3, its a standard 7200 rpm IDE drive.

i tried the append but running 'lilo' doesnt like this.
 
Old 05-24-2007, 09:42 PM   #17
overlook1977
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Distribution: Fedora 15
Posts: 68

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
just a thought...how does it know where the tux icon is? AND, is it possible the resolution of this icon, if its even trying to load it, is somehow not matching all the screen resolutions ive tried so far? I dont understand how the stupid login console has issues but X runs fine.

Last edited by overlook1977; 05-24-2007 at 09:46 PM.
 
Old 05-24-2007, 10:07 PM   #18
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
So, lemme get this straight, just so I know where we are at here:

You can boot just fine now, right ? Everything works fine, but you want to boot with the framebuffer set to a higher resolution, right ?

That append that I suggested goes in your lilo.conf somewhere after 'image='.
 
Old 05-25-2007, 04:38 AM   #19
JohnKFT
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: NW Scotland
Distribution: Slackware 10
Posts: 169

Rep: Reputation: 30
... penguin logo can cause problems

I seem to remember reading somewhere (can't remember where) that 'Using a VESA framebuffer console in lilo.conf gives you finer graphics and a nice penguin logo but can cause problems .... '. Can't remember what the problems were, or even if they were described.

Not helpful I know, nor even explanatory, but at least indicates that you are probably not actually doing anything wrong as such, although perhaps cannot for some reason get your tux back. My lilo.conf gives these options :

# Normal VGA console
vga = normal
# VESA framebuffer console @ 1024x768x64k
# vga=791
# VESA framebuffer console @ 1024x768x32k
# vga=790
# VESA framebuffer console @ 1024x768x256
# vga=773
# VESA framebuffer console @ 800x600x64k
# vga=788
# VESA framebuffer console @ 800x600x32k
# vga=787
# VESA framebuffer console @ 800x600x256
# vga=771
# VESA framebuffer console @ 640x480x64k
# vga=785
# VESA framebuffer console @ 640x480x32k
# vga=784
# VESA framebuffer console @ 640x480x256
# vga=769

vga=769 is presumably the least demanding of the system, so perhaps it is worth experimenting, beginning with that one. If that works you can move up till it complains. If, however, I am talking rubbish, hopefully someone will say so.
 
Old 05-25-2007, 07:05 AM   #20
overlook1977
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Distribution: Fedora 15
Posts: 68

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
You can boot just fine now, right ? Everything works fine, but you want to boot with the framebuffer set to a higher resolution, right ?
Exactly. I can boot with vga=normal. I have also cycled thru all the other options, and it only will take vga=normal. It drives me particularly crazy b/c it worked in 2.4, and something changed with the new kernel.

So would I put vga=773 (what it was in 2.4) at the top, and the put append="vga=normal" at the bottom below the image line?

Last edited by overlook1977; 05-25-2007 at 07:14 AM.
 
Old 05-25-2007, 07:11 AM   #21
overlook1977
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Distribution: Fedora 15
Posts: 68

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
OK, so let me ask this. How can I find out if I have framebuffer support in the kernel? I know the driver is good b/c X works and it booted nice and pretty in 2.4.
 
Old 05-25-2007, 11:49 AM   #22
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Check your .config, look for vesafb. Typically vesafb may have problems with higher resolutions on some cards. That's why one uses nvidiafb or rivafb if one has an nvdia card. Unfortunately, these two modules conflict with the proprietary nvidia driver ... oh well.
 
Old 05-26-2007, 10:33 AM   #23
overlook1977
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Distribution: Fedora 15
Posts: 68

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
i did a search for 'vesafb' in the .config file and that text is not in there. Do I need to recompile the kernel?
 
Old 05-26-2007, 10:42 AM   #24
overlook1977
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Distribution: Fedora 15
Posts: 68

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Code:
# Graphics support
#
CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID=y
# CONFIG_FB is not set
hmmm....this was in the config file. Perhaps this is why I do not have framebuffer support? If so, what would be the procedure to fix?
 
Old 05-26-2007, 12:10 PM   #25
MannyNix
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: ~
Distribution: Slackware -current
Posts: 465

Rep: Reputation: 53
Hi, not sure what's your video card, as for kernel video options check this Gentoo Nvidia guide Very helpfull imo.
As for kernel compiling take a look at Alien Bob's kernel guide. You can probably start reading from "Downloading and configuring".
I believe everything you're looking for is there, if not, ask the slackers around
 
Old 05-26-2007, 12:24 PM   #26
overlook1977
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Distribution: Fedora 15
Posts: 68

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
the card is a nvidia geforce4 mx 420, 64 MB

I had to use a legacy 1.0-96xx driver...if this helps.
 
Old 05-26-2007, 12:38 PM   #27
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Well, here's my graphics support section:

Code:
#
# Graphics support
#
CONFIG_FB=y
CONFIG_FB_CFB_FILLRECT=y
CONFIG_FB_CFB_COPYAREA=y
CONFIG_FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT=y
# CONFIG_FB_MACMODES is not set
# CONFIG_FB_FIRMWARE_EDID is not set
# CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS is not set
# CONFIG_FB_TILEBLITTING is not set
# CONFIG_FB_CIRRUS is not set
# CONFIG_FB_PM2 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_CYBER2000 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_ARC is not set
# CONFIG_FB_ASILIANT is not set
# CONFIG_FB_IMSTT is not set
# CONFIG_FB_VGA16 is not set
CONFIG_FB_VESA=y
CONFIG_VIDEO_SELECT=y
# CONFIG_FB_HGA is not set
# CONFIG_FB_S1D13XXX is not set
# CONFIG_FB_NVIDIA is not set
# CONFIG_FB_RIVA is not set
# CONFIG_FB_I810 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_INTEL is not set
# CONFIG_FB_MATROX is not set
# CONFIG_FB_RADEON is not set
# CONFIG_FB_ATY128 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_ATY is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SAVAGE is not set
# CONFIG_FB_SIS is not set
# CONFIG_FB_NEOMAGIC is not set
# CONFIG_FB_KYRO is not set
# CONFIG_FB_3DFX is not set
# CONFIG_FB_VOODOO1 is not set
# CONFIG_FB_CYBLA is not set
# CONFIG_FB_TRIDENT is not set
# CONFIG_FB_GEODE is not set
# CONFIG_FB_VIRTUAL is not set
Note things in red.
 
Old 05-26-2007, 12:42 PM   #28
overlook1977
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Distribution: Fedora 15
Posts: 68

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
H_TeXMeX_H: Thanks for the input, I would suspect that is the problem also. If I change the .config file, do I have to recompile the kernel or anything to make the change effective?
 
Old 05-26-2007, 02:21 PM   #29
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Of course. The .config file is configuration file used to build the kernel. It dictates what is going to be built-in to the kernel, what as a module, and what should not be built at all.
 
Old 05-29-2007, 09:12 AM   #30
gnashley
Amigo developer
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,928

Rep: Reputation: 612Reputation: 612Reputation: 612Reputation: 612Reputation: 612Reputation: 612
A couple of pointers: using vga=normal disables the frame buffer and allows you to use the real driver for your video card with whatever acceleration features, etc.
The 'icon' is contained in a header file within the kernel sources and gets compiled into the kernel, but if you are using vga=normal you will not see the icon.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
kernel panic due to incorrect root partition neelay1 Linux - General 7 05-02-2006 03:14 PM
Upgraded kernel, lilo.conf, didn't run /sbin/lilo dtashima Linux - Newbie 4 10-18-2004 11:21 AM
grub.conf and Kernel Panic!! phekno Linux - Software 4 10-15-2003 11:08 PM
No new kernel-option in LILO after editing lilo.conf corwax Debian 3 08-26-2003 08:55 PM
Grub.conf - Kernel Panic. liguorir Linux - Software 2 06-29-2003 01:03 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration