Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
01-11-2011, 12:10 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 117
Rep:
|
How often do you have to update your nvidia drivers, slackers?
How often do you have to update your nvidia drivers? Do any patches ever mess them up?
|
|
|
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
|
01-11-2011, 12:27 AM
|
#2
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 6,465
|
The nVidia drivers are built for the current kernel version, so any time that the kernel version is changed then the nVidia kernel module needs to be rebuilt.
Also the nVidia driver creates symlinks that overwrite libraries provided by the mesa and X packages. So any time that mesa or X updated, then the nVidia driver needs to be reinstalled.
Within Slackware -stable , the mesa, X and kernel version do not change, so any patches applied to -stable should not require reinstalling the nVidia driver.
|
|
2 members found this post helpful.
|
01-11-2011, 02:43 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2010
Posts: 621
Rep:
|
Running 13.1 x64, no multilib. I update nvidia driver as little as possible. Last time was when I updated the kernel to 2.6.36, the old one would not build, so I pulled the latest at the time: NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-260.19.21.run, and it worked well with 2.6.36.x and with 2.6.37 during the last few days. There is no security concern I am aware of, so I don't fix what is not broken.
|
|
|
01-11-2011, 02:49 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
|
I agree with allend, I usually update the nvidia drivers along with the kernel, unless the nvidia drivers are release in quick succession and fix many bugs. And, indeed, I do try NOT to update the nvidia drivers, because I've found it is more likely that new bugs will appear rather than older ones being fixed.
|
|
|
01-11-2011, 09:56 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Virginia
Distribution: Slackware = Main OpSys
Posts: 4,979
|
Patches? We Don't Need No Steenking Patches!
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoffeeKing!!!
How often do you have to update your nvidia drivers? Do any patches ever mess them up?
|
Sorry for the title. I'm just an old Bogart fan and couldn't resist.
I have old boxen still running Slack 12.2 through numerous kernel and system upgrades (from v10) that has had the same GeForce 6600GT in it. I only rarely updated the driver and stopped a few years ago, only running the nVidia installer whenever a newer kernel was adopted. It's generally better to only upgrade for some specific reason, not just because something new came out. It isn't at all uncommon that support for older hardware dwindles down to an afterthought after enough hardware upgrade cycles. In fact it isn't uncommon that the initial software is more aggressive and later versions are "toned down" to be compatible with bargain basement versions of hardware.
|
|
|
01-11-2011, 06:18 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 117
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks, all.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|