SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I followed Shilo's post to compile 2.6.19.1 kernel, but when I boot the new kernel, I got nothing from the screen,, it is actually a black screen, I can only see the light for HDD is flashing, which indicating the booting process might be going OK....
I can get into the 2.4.33.3 kernel, but a black screen for new kernel,,can someone tell me why this is happening....? Did I mess up the video card setup during my kernel compiling?
I guess not, and there are so many options, and I read through most of them and found all mentioned by Shilo had been built in by default, so I think 2.6.19.1 kernel default everything I need and therefore,,,
I will give it try again later..
Reddaz,, do you mind telling me what benefits will I get for updating to kernel 2.6 from 2.4, other than more hardware supported?
Its 2.6.18, I know, but it worked for me. I of course modified important settings for my hardware (processor, etc).
Another thing you should consider is that you do NOT want to compile your file system support as module. Meaning that if you are booting into a ReiserFS for example, then you would say yes for Reiser FS support rather than M. I made this mistake an got a kernel panic...
Reddaz,, do you mind telling me what benefits will I get for updating to kernel 2.6 from 2.4, other than more hardware supported?
Some people choose a 2.4 kernel because they believe the code is more stable than the 2.6 kernel, but this is debatable. Use whichever kernel you want as long as all your hardware is supported. I personally use the 2.6 kernel because thats the default on most distros these days.
I had a very similar problem while building a kernel to work on my laptop. It took me a while to figure it out, but basically the problem was the framebuffer options in my kernel config. I recompiled (2.6.19.1 is working really well) my kernel, and unchecked all the options relating to graphics support. This worked. Then I installed the NVIDIA modules, and everything was fine.
You might troubleshoot by compiling without any graphics support at all. It worked for me.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.