LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-29-2013, 07:01 AM   #1
gmgf
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware Zenwalk
Posts: 169

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
For Pat package slang1


Pat, just a question, are you sure slang1 is needed on slack-current now,

it seem just aalib, is linked on it.

thanks,

gmgf
 
Old 06-29-2013, 09:29 AM   #2
Stephen Morgan
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: England
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 158

Rep: Reputation: 16
Some people might still be using it for other things too. Is there a reason you want it removed?
 
Old 06-29-2013, 10:06 AM   #3
mancha
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 417

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
After just a very cursory look, seems at least aaxine and any program that uses gst-plugins-good use it.

Like Stephen, I am puzzled by the remove request.
 
Old 06-29-2013, 10:20 AM   #4
gmgf
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware Zenwalk
Posts: 169

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Yes, i agree, but it's probably, because these packages depend on aalib, and aalib depend on slang1 and slang.
 
Old 06-29-2013, 10:57 AM   #5
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware{,64}-{14.1,current} on a Lenovo Thinkpad W520
Posts: 5,233

Rep: Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443
I think that Pat is pretty picky when examining requests for removal, and rightly so.

So, for your request be considered, I guess that you'll need a stronger rationale than "I don't need it"

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 06-29-2013 at 10:58 AM.
 
Old 06-29-2013, 11:13 AM   #6
gmgf
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware Zenwalk
Posts: 169

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Probably, but just a question, i think slang1 is obsolet, but maybe I'm wrong.
 
Old 06-29-2013, 11:27 AM   #7
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware{,64}-{14.1,current} on a Lenovo Thinkpad W520
Posts: 5,233

Rep: Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443Reputation: 1443
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmgf View Post
Probably, but just a question, i think slang1 is obsolet, but maybe I'm wrong.
If it is obsolete it could be replaced by something better whose introduction wouldn't break packages or applications that depend on it. Which one would you propose?

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 06-29-2013 at 11:29 AM.
 
Old 06-29-2013, 11:31 AM   #8
gmgf
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware Zenwalk
Posts: 169

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
i think slang only.
 
Old 06-29-2013, 02:04 PM   #9
gmgf
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware Zenwalk
Posts: 169

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Another raison slang1 is not present in fedora since fedora-6, no present in debian, in archlinux, probably gentoo and other...........
 
Old 06-29-2013, 08:47 PM   #10
guanx
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,014

Rep: Reputation: 147Reputation: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmgf View Post
Another raison slang1 is not present in fedora since fedora-6, no present in debian, in archlinux, probably gentoo and other...........
If this reason is adequate, let's remove init.
 
Old 06-30-2013, 01:20 AM   #11
gmgf
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware Zenwalk
Posts: 169

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
sysvinit is used and maintained, but slang1 is probably useless and also unmaintained since 10 years
 
Old 06-30-2013, 06:45 PM   #12
guanx
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,014

Rep: Reputation: 147Reputation: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmgf View Post
sysvinit is used and maintained, but slang1 is probably useless and also unmaintained since 10 years
sysvinit is not in slackware. how can you remove it?
 
Old 06-30-2013, 07:02 PM   #13
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 16,238
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445
Quote:
Originally Posted by guanx View Post
sysvinit is not in slackware. how can you remove it?
Where did you get that impression? Sysvinit is Slackware's process 0, it is just used with BSD style scripts:
Code:
tobi ~ ☺ $ slackpkg info sysvinit

PACKAGE NAME:  sysvinit-2.88dsf-i486-2.txz
PACKAGE LOCATION:  ./slackware/a
PACKAGE SIZE (compressed):  76 K
PACKAGE SIZE (uncompressed):  200 K
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION:
sysvinit: sysvinit (init, the parent of all processes)
sysvinit:
sysvinit: System V style init programs by Miquel van Smoorenburg that control
sysvinit: the booting and shutdown of your system.  These support a number of
sysvinit: system runlevels, each with a specific set of utilities spawned.
sysvinit: For example, the normal system runlevel is 3, which starts agetty
sysvinit: on virtual consoles tty1 - tty6.  Runlevel 4 starts xdm.
sysvinit: Runlevel 0 shuts the system down.
sysvinit:
 
Old 06-30-2013, 07:37 PM   #14
wildwizard
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Oz
Distribution: slackware64-14.0
Posts: 783

Rep: Reputation: 233Reputation: 233Reputation: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
Sysvinit is Slackware's process 0
PID 1 actually.
 
Old 06-30-2013, 07:48 PM   #15
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 16,238
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445Reputation: 4445
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildwizard View Post
PID 1 actually.
Of course.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hi, Pat ! brodo Slackware 12 01-10-2012 11:18 AM
[SOLVED] Building linux-firmware package with Pat's slackbuild script Phorize Slackware 8 10-05-2011 05:54 AM
Supporting Pat hitest Slackware 19 06-05-2008 07:30 PM
Can Pat Keep it Up? shepper Slackware 16 12-20-2005 11:49 PM
Pat needs our Help! Namaseit Slackware 15 01-31-2005 12:55 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration