SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Could be the bad disk, bad profile, bad extension, anything really.. not enough info.
Since giving up on FF, I compile unofficial version of palemoon, it loads everything from tmpfs, works great for me at the moment.
I habitually run in excess of 50 tabs in a number of windows on whatever version -current has to offer. Previously tabs started to fail and eventually everything would terminate when total memory consumption exceeded 4 GB. This has recently changed and stability has increased greatly for me.
I had been lagging behind in current since i was waiting for beta but upgraded yesterday and now i had this problem a couple of times since then with one total lockup that forced an reboot and one that could be fixed by ctrl+alt+backspace (restarting X).
It freezes to fast for me to "killall -9 firefox" and often to fast for me to ctrl+alt+esc and when i was fast enough to kill firefox i still needed to restart X since all windows was only black (dolhin, konsole and so on).
I didn't have any problems before the update.
I use a laptop with Ryzen 2500U, 16gb DDR4 also a have a lot of tabs open in my firefox.
The ones that have this kind of problems is it only laptop or desktop also, many tabs or few?
I often need a total reboot, restarting X works sometimes if i am fast enough.
I have had no problems since i made that comment and closed all tabs so i guess it was one page that i had open in a tab that caused it.
I believe the intent was to say one "specific tab" out of those that were open likely was to blame.
Not having "many open tabs" in general
I have long since discovered that the vast majority of web sites are malformed. Sometimes that just makes them ugly at the source level, but more often it makes them inefficient and slower to load. On Facebook in particular there are specific conditions when the page source becomes totally ridiculous. I discovered that I was able to totally lock up the page by replicating certain normal actions in the same order. Migrating to FireFox (mozilla) based browsers reduced the problem (the source was just as ugly, but it took more to lock it up) but the problem remained. I found three solutions that worked:
1. move to an alternate browser like Dillo, that simply do not support the most ugly of the page codes: this caused complaints from Facebook, but avoided lockup.
2. move to the mobile pages (m.facebook.com) which are fare more simple. This does not support all of the features, but avoids much of the ugly code.
3. Move to a different social media site. Few of them send code NEARLY as ugly as Facebook.
I had a fourth option, run Facebook using the traditional desktop. It was, on occasion, rather bad, but not NEARLY so bad as the new interface. Alas, Facebook has disabled the traditional interface and going back is no longer offered as an option.
In relation to THIS thread, my conclusion is that the problem may not be with the browser or rendering, but it may be with a badly malformed PAGE on the SITE! I have run into these so often that I have taken to calling it the HTML BOMB. I am not sure it is DESIGNED to blow up browsers, but it might as well be. Could it be that you have found such a page?
I have run into these so often that I have taken to calling it the HTML BOMB. I am not sure it is DESIGNED to blow up browsers, but it might as well be. Could it be that you have found such a page?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.