LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-13-2008, 08:38 PM   #46
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,223

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320

The culprit was --enable-install-strip.

Ubuntu goes out of its way to disable that option, so it's not suprising that my builds failed when using Ubuntu patches.

Last edited by dugan; 07-13-2008 at 08:43 PM.
 
Old 07-13-2008, 08:46 PM   #47
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Rep: Reputation: 52
Yea. I noticed that yesterday and wondered why it was there.

So devhelp builds now, right?
 
Old 07-13-2008, 08:57 PM   #48
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,223

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320
Yes, yes it does.
 
Old 07-13-2008, 11:40 PM   #49
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,223

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320
Jong, how have your experiences with mplayerplug-in been?

With version 3.55 I ran into this problem. At that link are comments that my XULRunner Slackbuild is at fault. This is plausible. After all, yours does a lot of 1337 things that I can't even understand .

However, I could build 3.55 just fine using Arch Linux patches. I could also build 3.50 using Gentoo patches.

Now I don't know what to believe.

Well to be honest, I first ran into this problem:
Quote:
checking for xpidl... no
configure: error: xpidl compiler not found
To solve it, I've uploaded a new XULRunner SlackBuild that puts /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9 in the $PATH.

Last edited by dugan; 07-14-2008 at 12:21 AM.
 
Old 07-14-2008, 03:24 AM   #50
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Rep: Reputation: 52
Well. First it's xulrunner's fault. Then, it's the packagers fault. I did notice the {stable,unstable} idl directories when I was drafting my SlackBuild but I guess I got confused by reading the comments in libxul.pc... They were talking about includedir only.. That "=stable" got burned in my brain. So... It's a xulrunner bug. If they don't want to fix it, then I suppose it's up to you.

As far as xpidl not being found, it's mplayerplug-in's issue. He's still querrying libdir from 1.8 gecko.
Quote:
MOZILLA_HOME=`$PKG_CONFIG --variable=libdir libxul`
Sorry, but there is no libdir in libxul.pc...

Here is a patch that should take care of all your issues (remove your $PATH addition to properly test). I quit running mplayer years ago because I felt development was too stagnant. So, I can't help you test. The patch does work however and, 10:1, gecko-mediaplayer should build fine. Same thing Arch does only the changes happen upstream instead of with mplayerplug-in...

http://jaguarlinux.com/pub/sandbox/x...kgconfig.patch

BTW, my xulrunner would have done the same thing. It's funny how after compiling 160 gnome packages, NONE of them have trouble finding xpidl or idl/stable, but as soon as you hit a small backwater package with an arrogant lazy developer, you get:

"Sorry, packaging error, needs to get fixed by the xulrunner packager.
Not the first time I've seen this either."

Well, then fix it you prick. Lot's of other devs have made concessions for the new API and format but I guess that's beneath him.

Last edited by jong357; 07-14-2008 at 04:10 AM.
 
Old 07-14-2008, 08:47 AM   #51
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,223

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320
Jong, I bow to your knowledge and your google-fu!

I will try the patch out tonight.

Did you write it or find it? If you found it, could you please link to it?

I didn't check to see if the Arch patch dealt with the xpidl issue, and I just found a patch for it on the gecko-mediaplayer google group.

Last edited by dugan; 07-14-2008 at 08:56 AM.
 
Old 07-14-2008, 11:35 AM   #52
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Rep: Reputation: 52
I wrote it but Fedora, and presumably others, do the same thing.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412971

http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs...ch?view=markup

A bug should be filed with mplayerplug-in about his use of libdir tho. It should be:

MOZILLA_HOME="`$PKG_CONFIG --variable=sdkdir libxul`/bin"

Guess I can't argue about the idl directories tho...
 
Old 07-15-2008, 02:04 AM   #53
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,223

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320
Thanks for pointing out that I don't need to set the PATH to get mplayerplug-in to build. I've removed that part from my XULRunner SlackBuild.

Last edited by dugan; 07-15-2008 at 02:06 AM.
 
Old 07-16-2008, 06:39 PM   #54
Daedra
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Springfield, MO
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 2,683

Rep: Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375Reputation: 1375
Looks like 3.0.1 is out. I haven't read the changelog yet to see what has been changed or fixed, just FYI in case you want to update the builds.
 
Old 07-16-2008, 08:20 PM   #55
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Rep: Reputation: 52
http://www.mozilla.org/security/anno...sa2008-34.html

Still not seeing a thunderbird 2.0.0.16 yet... Or a .15 for that matter.

Hey Dugan, get a chance to try that patch with mplayerplug-in or gecko-mediaplayer or what ever it was?

Last edited by jong357; 07-16-2008 at 08:24 PM.
 
Old 07-17-2008, 02:52 AM   #56
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,223

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daedra View Post
Looks like 3.0.1 is out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jong357 View Post
CARP! So 3.0.1 is out and it has a very dangerous bug? I've made SlackBuilds for both 3.0 and 3.0.1 available, and edited the first post accordingly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jong357 View Post
Hey Dugan, get a chance to try that patch with mplayerplug-in or gecko-mediaplayer or what ever it was?
I just got to try it now. It worked as you promised, and allowed mplayerplug-in to compile without patches. I didn't incorporate it into my XULRunner SlackBuild, though, because I'd personally rather patch mplayerplug-in than XULRunner.
 
Old 07-17-2008, 02:59 AM   #57
Oliver_H
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD
Posts: 47

Rep: Reputation: 16
http://www.mozilla.org/security/anno...sa2008-34.html

No this bug is fixed _in_ 3.0.1.
 
Old 07-17-2008, 08:52 AM   #58
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,223

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320
Thanks. It was _late_ when I posted that. I've edited the first post again.
 
Old 07-17-2008, 11:12 AM   #59
Oliver_H
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD
Posts: 47

Rep: Reputation: 16
Btw. thanks for this nice slackbuild :-)
 
Old 09-03-2008, 12:56 AM   #60
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,223

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320Reputation: 5320
I've uploaded new SlackBuilds.

XULRunner has been upgraded to version 1.9.0.1.
Firefox is still at 3.0.1, but it's now easier to upgrade.

Also added a note about using the proper Flash version.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slackbuilds from 12.0 for 12.1 arubin Slackware 7 05-07-2008 03:51 AM
Slackbuilds are great arubin Slackware 1 12-17-2007 07:42 PM
slackbuilds.org harkonen Slackware 16 08-22-2007 02:01 PM
Use SlackBuilds.org or my own hosting to offer up SlackBuilds? hollywoodb Slackware 6 11-30-2006 08:56 PM
Are there any SlackBuilds for Firefox 1.5 (build from source) spinner_0 Slackware 7 01-18-2006 04:48 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration