LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-26-2006, 06:48 PM   #1
patfins
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 21

Rep: Reputation: 15
feature request: high memory kernel (up to 4GB) as default


My simple question is: why not?!?
 
Old 04-26-2006, 08:09 PM   #2
Linux.tar.gz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Paris
Distribution: Slackware forever.
Posts: 2,534

Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
The answer is very simple:
Because.

Do you realize what you asked?
I mean each distro got it's own compiled kernel...

Last edited by Linux.tar.gz; 04-26-2006 at 08:28 PM.
 
Old 04-26-2006, 08:24 PM   #3
J.W.
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 87
Setting high memory makes sense these days, where having 512Mg of RAM is typical for new machines, and where having 1G of RAM is impressive but not exactly uncommon. I'd agree that it would be nice if it were the default
 
Old 04-26-2006, 08:35 PM   #4
patfins
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 21

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Is a PC with 1GB ram or more realy unusual (2GB in my case)? All memory above 1GB isn't used by the default (generic 2.6) kernel.
 
Old 04-26-2006, 08:38 PM   #5
drkstr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, WA: USA
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 1,191

Rep: Reputation: 45
are you against compiling your own kernel? This is generally a good idea anyways, even if everything works fine. I like to only run as much kernel as I need.

regards,
...drkstr
 
Old 04-26-2006, 09:18 PM   #6
patfins
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 21

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I'm not against compiling your kernel (No SMT and reiser4 without kernel compile/patch), but compling the kernel should be an option, no must.
 
Old 04-26-2006, 09:29 PM   #7
rkelsen
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,421
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535
Quote:
Originally Posted by patfins
My simple question is: why not?!?
Highmem causes a reduction in performance.

Personally, I can't tell on my machine.
 
Old 04-26-2006, 10:26 PM   #8
MS3FGX
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,852

Rep: Reputation: 361Reputation: 361Reputation: 361Reputation: 361
Quote:
I'm not against compiling your kernel (No SMT and reiser4 without kernel compile/patch), but compling the kernel should be an option, no must.
I really doubt we are at the point where we can consider having support for 4 GB of RAM a must.
 
Old 04-26-2006, 10:27 PM   #9
davidsrsb
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 current
Posts: 770

Rep: Reputation: 33
Maybe worth adding a highmem kernel as an install option, probably with smp support as well as the two tend to go together, but not as default as highmem will slow a more typical 256Mb or less machine.
 
Old 04-26-2006, 11:37 PM   #10
vbisis
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 250

Rep: Reputation: 34
Yes that would be really good.

The only thing why I recompile my kernel is because of high memory support.
It would surely make sense these days, lots of machines have at least 1 GB of RAM Servers as well as desktop machines.
 
Old 04-27-2006, 03:57 PM   #11
dennisk
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Southwestern USA
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 279

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Highmem causes a reduction in performance.
Under what conditions?

Dennisk
 
Old 04-27-2006, 09:09 PM   #12
rkelsen
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,421
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535Reputation: 2535
Quote:
Originally Posted by dennisk
Under what conditions?
On machines with less than 1 gig of memory.
 
Old 04-27-2006, 09:34 PM   #13
187807
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina, USA
Distribution: Slackware 11
Posts: 174

Rep: Reputation: 30
On another note, IIRC, when I upgraded to 1GB of memory I initially didn't choose the 4GB option in the kernel compile. I noticed in the scroll of startup messages (and with dmesg, I think) some message about only so much memory being available (the amount it said was available was at least 150M below the 1GB I had installed).

I noticed this one day and then chose the 4GB option in kernel config. I then chose the memory model (I think it's 3GB/1GB, then has a comment about having full 1GB lower mem available or something). Message didn't appear after that.

Then again, that was on 32-bit slackware (I'm using Slamd64 now). For some reason I'm thinking that I haven't even been asked about the memory stuff in kernel config with x86_64 config except for choosing model (flat or sparse). Then again I'm not that good at all at this stuff so I don't know for sure. But I do know about getting that memory message I posted above about limited low memory with 32-bit slackware and it disappeared when choosing 4GB memory in kernel config.
 
Old 04-27-2006, 10:28 PM   #14
J.W.
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 87
Check out Section 2 of this article regarding the mysterious 880Mg limit
 
Old 04-27-2006, 10:57 PM   #15
187807
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: North Carolina, USA
Distribution: Slackware 11
Posts: 174

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.W.
Check out Section 2 of this article regarding the mysterious 880Mg limit
Excellent read. Thanks much.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
is high mem support in a 2.6 kernel advised against for 1GB of memory? hedpe Linux - General 2 09-06-2005 09:35 AM
High speed memory, linux kernel decompress error randyding Linux - Hardware 2 09-04-2005 08:08 PM
feature request fragger Slackware 2 08-25-2004 06:10 AM
Help!?! RH 8 Memory Mapping -High Memory-Virtural Memory issues.. Merlin53 Linux - Hardware 2 06-18-2003 04:48 PM
CDCOPY 1.04 feature request ? MasterC Linux - Software 11 10-20-2002 04:10 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration