LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Slackware (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/)
-   -   ETA Slack 13.2 (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/eta-slack-13-2-a-848501/)

clifford227 12-05-2010 02:32 PM

ETA Slack 13.2
 
Howdy,

I know that 13.2 will be released when its ready, I was just wondering when that might be. Anyone care to take a guess?

onebuck 12-05-2010 02:36 PM

Hi,

Quote:

Originally Posted by clifford227 (Post 4181519)
Howdy,

I know that 13.2 will be released when its ready, I was just wondering when that might be? Anyone care to take a guess?

It seems you answered the question by the inclusion of the first sentence of your request.

:hattip:

kapz 12-05-2010 03:29 PM

Quote:

It seems you answered the question by the inclusion of the first sentence of your request.
That might be it!

manwichmakesameal 12-05-2010 03:29 PM

It's that time already? Is this the thread where everyone makes their guesses?

kapz 12-05-2010 03:35 PM

Quote:

Is this the thread where everyone makes their guesses?
Of course!

It will be ready only when Pat and the team thinks it's ready! Unless ur from the team u'd just have to guess!..I guess ;)

gargamel 12-05-2010 04:23 PM

Is the question within the defined scope of another question to which the answer is 42? :)

gargamel

brianL 12-05-2010 04:25 PM

Are we there yet?

clifford227 12-05-2010 05:44 PM

well I suppose It will be a nice suprise whenever its released.

I Just hope its around january.

Not that I want Pat and the team to work through christmas to meet my schedule (and save my life).

brianL 12-05-2010 05:58 PM

I've read my tealeaves. Looked in my crystal ball. Consulted the I Ching and the Tarot. Sacrificed every living thing that crawls, walks, flies, swims, or slithers. But I can't get a definite date! :scratch: :banghead:

hitest 12-05-2010 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianL (Post 4181695)
I've read my tealeaves. Looked in my crystal ball. Consulted the I Ching and the Tarot. Sacrificed every living thing that crawls, walks, flies, swims, or slithers. But I can't get a definite date! :scratch: :banghead:

I hear you, man. I've consulted with our local shaman and she is being evasive. Danged if I know. :)

2handband 12-05-2010 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clifford227 (Post 4181681)
well I suppose It will be a nice suprise whenever its released.

I Just hope its around january.

Not that I want Pat and the team to work through christmas to meet my schedule (and save my life).

Why so early? I'm kinda hoping it has KDE 4.6, myself.

chrisretusn 12-05-2010 09:19 PM

My guess is 13.2 will be released before 13.3 ;)

Assuming that 13.2 is the next release version. :)

mRgOBLIN 12-06-2010 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kapz (Post 4181573)
Of course!

It will be ready only when Pat and the team thinks it's ready! Unless ur from the team u'd just have to guess!..I guess ;)

And sometimes even if you're part of the team....

Martinezio 12-06-2010 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisretusn (Post 4181828)
My guess is 13.2 will be released before 13.3 ;)

Assuming that 13.2 is the next release version. :)

Looking at the history of Slack, the next release should be 14 ;) But even the oldests polish Highlanders don't know this, so this must be mistery even in Heaven :scratch:

Stay cool - You will be noticed, when it's ready :D

sycamorex 12-06-2010 02:22 AM

Well, if the changelogs for -current are anything to go by, the next one will be 13.2.
As per BrianL's suggestion, I keep monitoring the wikileaks website, however, they don't
seem to have any intel on Slackware, either.

brianL 12-06-2010 04:52 AM

Maybe we should skip a few numbers, it's been done before, to stay ahead of Fedora (it's up to 14! :eek: ). The next release will be Slackware 17.0.

sycamorex 12-06-2010 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianL (Post 4182053)
Maybe we should skip a few numbers, it's been done before, to stay ahead of Fedora (it's up to 14! :eek: ). The next release will be Slackware 17.0.

Alternatively, the version could be 17.3 - This would definitely keep the rest of the world busy trying to figure out why 17.3. In the meantime Pat would have enough time to add time traveling support to Slackware startup scripts.

PDock 12-06-2010 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mRgOBLIN (Post 4181935)
And sometimes even if you're part of the team....

The wait is longer than the team members or anyone expects. Seems a 'Slackard' named volkerdi has been hanging around the forum. He has only made 64 posts having signed up in 02 so who would expect that input to be of any value. Heck my Dell 2350 does not even boot without pressing F1 because I would not buy a replacement fan from Dell.

Can't spend more time posting here I have real work to do.

ppd

ps Yes there is a huge smile on my face, which looks ridiculous because my cheek has a tongue in it.

rworkman 12-06-2010 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sycamorex (Post 4181969)
I keep monitoring the wikileaks website, however, they don't seem to have any intel on Slackware, either.

No corruption or hypocrisy within the organization, so WikiLeaks lost interest ;-)

brianL 12-06-2010 09:24 AM

All mention of Slackware was removed from Wikileaks by a cracker named iluvwindoze, his real identity is unknown, but here is a photograph

hitest 12-06-2010 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianL (Post 4182273)
All mention of Slackware was removed from Wikileaks by a cracker named iluvwindoze, his real identity is unknown, but here is a photograph

Ha-ha that guy is in serious need of a rug!
13.2 is coming to mirror near you in the coming days/weeks/months.
I sense a disturbance in the force. :)

brianL 12-06-2010 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hitest (Post 4182286)
Ha-ha that guy is in serious need of a rug! :)

And a psychiatrist. :)

allend 12-06-2010 09:47 AM

Quote:

And a psychiatrist
Ahh, that explains why he thinks Win7 is a serious OS.

brianL 12-06-2010 10:03 AM

Cables deleted by iluvwindoze:
From 10, Downing St., to the Whitehouse:
Hi Barack,
Any news on the next Slackware release?
Dave
Reply:
Hi Dave,
No. You've got a 1337 Slacker over there, that brianL guy. Ask him?
Barack

2handband 12-06-2010 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hitest (Post 4182286)
Ha-ha that guy is in serious need of a rug!
13.2 is coming to mirror near you in the coming days/weeks/months.
I sense a disturbance in the force. :)

God, I hope not. There are a few things that haven't been released yet I would like to see included.

GazL 12-06-2010 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianL (Post 4182309)
Cables deleted by iluvwindoze:
From 10, Downing St., to the Whitehouse:
Hi Barack,
Any news on the next Slackware release?

Meanwhile, somewhere at CIA HQ.

CIA Agent: So, Mr. Volkerding... When will 13.2 be released?
*glug* *glug* *glug*
Pat (muffled): *glug* When *glug* *splutter* it's ready! *glug* *splutter* *cough*
CIA Agent: *sigh* Someone fetch another barrel of water!

brianL 12-06-2010 10:42 AM

They wouldn't dare waterboard Pat. That would bring down THE WRATH OF BOB on them.

mlangdn 12-06-2010 10:50 AM

I think that thinking about what everyone else is thinking of when the release will be is just thinking for nothing except for the sake of thinking, I think.

2handband 12-06-2010 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlangdn (Post 4182364)
I think that thinking about what everyone else is thinking of when the release will be is just thinking for nothing except for the sake of thinking, I think.

More or less, but I suppose it's not a bad way to spend a sleepy afternoon. Me, I'm hoping Pat sits on it until KDE 4.6, Koffice 2.3, and a bug-patched libxml for x86_64 makes it in.

rworkman 12-06-2010 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2handband (Post 4182403)
I'm hoping Pat sits on it until KDE 4.6, Koffice 2.3, and a bug-patched libxml for x86_64 makes it in.

What's wrong with libxml?

volkerdi 12-06-2010 03:26 PM

There's nothing wrong with libxml2, as I explained previously.

You know, we still haven't used the 13.37 version number. ;-)

hitest 12-06-2010 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by volkerdi (Post 4182679)
There's nothing wrong with libxml2, as I explained previously.

You know, we still haven't used the 13.37 version number. ;-)

That would be awesome! :)

mlangdn 12-06-2010 03:30 PM

You could always fore go a number and give it a name instead.

hitest 12-06-2010 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlangdn (Post 4182686)
You could always fore go a number and give it a name instead.

Ye Gods......not that!!!

brianL 12-06-2010 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by volkerdi (Post 4182679)
You know, we still haven't used the 13.37 version number. ;-)

:doh: I wish I'd thought of that. :)

eumyang 12-06-2010 04:19 PM

LOL, the OP asked a similar question not long before 13.1 was released:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...13-1-a-802054/
... and he lists "Slackware 12.2" as his distribution in his profile. :scratch:

2handband 12-06-2010 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by volkerdi (Post 4182679)
There's nothing wrong with libxml2, as I explained previously.

You know, we still haven't used the 13.37 version number. ;-)

oops, did i get 'em mixed up again?

sycamorex 12-06-2010 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianL (Post 4182747)
:doh: I wish I'd thought of that. :)

Who would have thought of 13.37?! Ok, 13.32 or 13.54 are obvious choices, but 13.37?!!!
I haven't been using Slackware long enough to come up with that:(

2handband 12-06-2010 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rworkman (Post 4182662)
What's wrong with libxml?

I don't pretend to understand it (and obviously I don't, as was just pointed out)... but there's something screwy in the interaction between zlibs and libxml2. I don't know what else it does, but it makes Ardour so unstable as to be useless.

rworkman 12-06-2010 05:09 PM

An older version of libxml2 was using the zlib API incorrectly, and that caused quite a few things to be "screwy," but that should be fixed now.

Does ardour statically link libxml2, and if so, was it built before -current was bumped to libxml2-2.7.7?

2handband 12-06-2010 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rworkman (Post 4182807)
An older version of libxml2 was using the zlib API incorrectly, and that caused quite a few things to be "screwy," but that should be fixed now.

Does ardour statically link libxml2, and if so, was it built before -current was bumped to libxml2-2.7.7?

Are you suggesting I rebuild Ardour? I can do that...

volkerdi 12-06-2010 06:03 PM

There is a newer libxml2, and while it doesn't claim to address any zlib issues it probably wouldn't hurt to bump that again.

2handband 12-06-2010 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by volkerdi (Post 4182856)
There is a newer libxml2, and while it doesn't claim to address any zlib issues it probably wouldn't hurt to bump that again.

I'll let you know what happens after I rebuild Ardour. I REALLY want to get Ardour working on the desktop machine; it's got a lot more horespower than either of the laptops.

brianL 12-07-2010 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlangdn (Post 4182686)
You could always fore go a number and give it a name instead.

No no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no!!!
No alliterative animals!
No Pixar personalities!

:D

sycamorex 12-07-2010 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianL (Post 4183392)
No no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no!!!
No alliterative animals!
No Pixar personalities!

:D

Even if it was: Slackware Brave Brian? LOL

I agree number versions are more interesting.

brianL 12-07-2010 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sycamorex (Post 4183395)
Even if it was: Slackware Brave Brian? LOL

I agree number versions are more interesting.

That would be worse than Natty Narwhal. :)
And the next Debian testing will be Wheezy! :)
I think those silly names might give people the impression that Linux is a toy, not a serious alternative to Windows.
Yeah, stick to numbers.

the_penguinator 12-07-2010 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianL (Post 4183392)
No alliterative animals!
No Pixar personalities!

:D

ah why not? you brits could be quite clever with that sort of thing...let's see...
Gullible Git
Totalled Tosser
Wheezy Wanker
etc...

brianL 12-07-2010 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_penguinator (Post 4183422)
ah why not? you brits could be quite clever with that sort of thing...let's see...
Gullible Git
Totalled Tosser
Wheezy Wanker
etc...

:D Pass those on to Ubuntu, in case they run out of ideas.

mlangdn 12-07-2010 08:32 AM

I was only kidding about a naming convention, however, Brave Brian does have a ring to it! hehe!

hitest 12-07-2010 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlangdn (Post 4183510)
I was only kidding about a naming convention, however, Brave Brian does have a ring to it! hehe!

I know you were kidding; I enjoyed your comment, it made me laugh. :)
Agreed. I prefer the numbering system we currently use.

***hitest thinks 13.37 would be awesome***

volkerdi rules!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 AM.