Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
11-08-2005, 04:35 AM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: uk - Reading
Distribution: slackware 14.2 kernel 4.19.43
Posts: 462
Rep:
|
drop in performance under load
Hi all.
I have noticed a drop in performance on my pc when it is under load conditions, (i.e using transcode to convert media etc..) after doing an upgrade on my system.
I have an AMD ATHLON XP+ RUNNING AT 2.13 GHZ
1.2 GHz of ram running.
geforce4 ti 4200 graphics card.
Changes:
:went from slackware 10.0 -2.4.246 to slack 10.2 - 2.6.13.
:Running kde now instead of GNOME.
:enabled HIGHMEM support into my kernel because the system was only using 720 MHz or so of memmory.
:added wifi card and configured system as an access point.
----
Under normal conditions it works ok.
i can surf /download/ watch films compile programs etc etc withought a blib.
but b4 I could do all that and probably have couple of instances of transcode running in the background aswell and it would run fine.
Now if i am using transcode everthing else is chronically slow.
even opening a terminal window might take 3 or so minutues???!
|
|
|
11-08-2005, 10:50 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Void Linux, former Slackware
Posts: 498
Rep:
|
How did you customized the kernel ? Enabled highmem support only ?
Don't start any graphical envirnoment, run transcode and on another screen/terminal check resource usage with top, f.E.
Size of memory is indicated in Bytes not Hertzes
|
|
|
11-08-2005, 12:34 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: uk - Reading
Distribution: slackware 14.2 kernel 4.19.43
Posts: 462
Original Poster
Rep:
|
transcode typically uses 99.9% of resources when it is run.
this was typical b4 the upgrade.?!!
yes I enabled high mem support.
ie i checcked the box that said 4GB
as opposed to 64GB or off.
re hertz
too much electronics :0)
|
|
|
11-08-2005, 03:33 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Bay
Distribution: Zenwalk, OpenBSD, Slackware
Posts: 167
Rep:
|
Try disabling himem and see if the problem goes away.
|
|
|
11-08-2005, 04:24 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: uk - Reading
Distribution: slackware 14.2 kernel 4.19.43
Posts: 462
Original Poster
Rep:
|
yeah.. for some reason I seem to remember reading that enabling highmem can actually de-grade performance.?!??
I will give it a $bash.
|
|
|
11-08-2005, 06:47 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2004
Distribution: Slackware current
Posts: 250
Rep:
|
Well I have 2 gigs of ram, and with out HIGHMEM, you can only use a little over 800megs of ram. So if you have under a gig disable it.
|
|
|
11-09-2005, 04:56 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: uk - Reading
Distribution: slackware 14.2 kernel 4.19.43
Posts: 462
Original Poster
Rep:
|
no same.
i have over a gig,just
1.2 GB.
Its got to be KDE ???
KDE seems alot more flashy than my previos gnome install from 10.0
this must eat up more resources ,no ?
|
|
|
11-09-2005, 09:36 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2004
Distribution: Slackware current
Posts: 250
Rep:
|
I don't notice a difference between DLG and kde 3.4.2 But i did enable preloading and disabled a bunch of kde's daemons. Could it be the kernel? Because I noticed that 2.6.14 seems to manage my ram better than 2.6.12.5
|
|
|
11-09-2005, 12:25 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: uk - Reading
Distribution: slackware 14.2 kernel 4.19.43
Posts: 462
Original Poster
Rep:
|
it could be..
I may try 2.6.14.
I loaded gnome by the way.
no joy just the same under that environment.
yup.
i think i will try another kernel.
|
|
|
11-09-2005, 12:30 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: uk - Reading
Distribution: slackware 14.2 kernel 4.19.43
Posts: 462
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bird603568
But i did enable preloading and disabled a bunch of kde's daemons. .
|
could you kindly advise how i can control which of kde's daemons run at start up.
And scuse my ignorance,but what is preloading?
thnks in advance.
|
|
|
11-10-2005, 05:58 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: uk - Reading
Distribution: slackware 14.2 kernel 4.19.43
Posts: 462
Original Poster
Rep:
|
new kernel has fixed this,,but now alsa will not re-compile.....
but thats for another thread.
u plug one hole,then u spring a leak else where ;0)
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|