Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
03-17-2004, 01:55 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 37
Rep:
|
Does slackware have NTFS read/write access on first time use?
And are these included with the current 9.1 release?
Pan
Xmms
Xzine
Open Office
Rhythmbox
gaim
|
|
|
03-17-2004, 02:37 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 141
Rep:
|
|
|
|
03-17-2004, 03:24 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Slackware 15.0
Posts: 1,272
Rep:
|
ntfs- i believe it is read only, you may have to modprobe it. There is a line in /etc/rc.d/rc.modules you can uncomment to automate that. Last I heard in the 2.4 kernels, ntfs write was experimental and dangerous. I do not believe it is compiled into the kernel so a a recomplile would be necessary.
pan- yes
xmms- yes
xine?- yes
open office- no
rythmbox- no?
gaim- yes?
|
|
|
03-17-2004, 04:03 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 141
Rep:
|
I just got done reading the link I posted... really interesting stuff regarding ntfs linux...
YES - the right modules are very sketchy now.... somewhat stable for file copy only, but no garantee.
A suggestion might be to use Partition Magic to convert the ntfs file system to fat32. I believe that only the current version supports this (not sure). NTFS is going to be an ongoing heartache if you go that direction.
|
|
|
03-17-2004, 08:52 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 37
Original Poster
Rep:
|
i have partition magic, and heard about the convert ntfs to fat32 but im thinking its like format, you'll lose all the data if you convert it, true? thats why i stuck with fat32.
ok no,
open office, which means i just need windows for id taging my mp3s and to use speard sheet/word.. i convert my word/sheet files to other formats while saving.
rythmbox is a must have. xmms i use for streams but to catalog all my mp3s and play it, i like rythmbox, its kinda like iTunes for windows.
some good infomation on that site sirpimpsalot. i saved all to disk.
|
|
|
03-17-2004, 09:25 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 141
Rep:
|
no! the partition magic convert procedure (from NTFS to Fat32) does keep all data %100 intact.... ive done it a dozen or so times without incident....
make sure to run the windows defrag and chkdisk on the ntfs volume before the operation...
|
|
|
03-17-2004, 09:42 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Slackware 15.0
Posts: 1,272
Rep:
|
You can download and install open office very easily. So that is not a problem.
|
|
|
03-17-2004, 11:09 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: FreeBSD 8.2 RELEASE
Posts: 607
Rep:
|
You can get rhythmbox as part of dropline gnome if you're into that sort of thing.
|
|
|
03-30-2004, 11:36 AM
|
#9
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 18
Rep:
|
Hello *,
Make sure the windows partition (NTFS) is r/w from the fstab file.
eg.
In /etc/fstab, add
/dev/hda1 /win98 vfat uid=root,gid=root,umask=000,exec,dev,suid,rw 1 0
Hope this helps.
kgm.
|
|
|
03-30-2004, 03:31 PM
|
#10
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: United States, Springfield, Ohio
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 9
Rep:
|
You don't need any special drivers to read or write to an NTFS partition at all. If you just mount the drive and give the type as SMBFS you will have full read/write access. I am not sure if this does the file permissions but it will definately write it to NTFS partition with no problem.
Like this
mount -t smbfs //Comp/Share /mnt/dir
Last edited by Longhaul; 03-30-2004 at 03:36 PM.
|
|
|
03-30-2004, 10:03 PM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Oregon
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 194
Rep:
|
um, so you mean that if one mounts their own ntfs share onto thier computer it will write ntfs without a problem...?
I was told that the reason samba could do it was because it was sending the info to the windows box to allow windows to write. Have you actually done this and had a working windows afterwards?
|
|
|
03-30-2004, 10:31 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Distribution: Linux Mint Gloria, Slackware 12.2
Posts: 165
Rep:
|
That sounds like it would work for a REMOTE samba share (i.e. a networked WinXP box), but does that work for a LOCAL harddrive without a WindowsOS that can respond to Samba in realtime?
--Akshun J
|
|
|
03-31-2004, 03:40 AM
|
#13
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,852
|
What Longhaul is talking about is writing to a SMB share on a remote Windows computer, you cannot use that to write to a local NTFS volume.
|
|
|
03-31-2004, 09:08 PM
|
#15
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Illinois
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 305
Rep:
|
This is what I get
What should I do so i can read files from my windows partition??
root@linux:/home/xpedition# mount -t ntfs /dev/hda1 /mnt/hd
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda1,
or too many mounted file systems
root@linux:/home/xpedition#
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|