Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.


  Search this Thread
Old 05-08-2013, 01:22 PM   #16
Timothy Miller
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, Fedora & Arch mostly.
Posts: 2,437

Rep: Reputation: 651Reputation: 651Reputation: 651Reputation: 651Reputation: 651Reputation: 651

I've never liked Kmail. For simple pop/imap mail, it's simply too large, complex, and requires too many things enabled on the back end that I don't like to bother with. The fact that it's also uglier IMO than Thunderbird or Evolution is just further reason to remove it from any system I use.
Old 05-08-2013, 01:37 PM   #17
Registered: Apr 2013
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware; Scientific Linux
Posts: 107

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I have tried to use Kmail in the past, but I never found it really convenient. I have been using Evolution
on Debian until 2010 and I switched to Thunderbird on Slackware after that. In both cases, I was using them
with an IMAP account. If you need a lighter email program with IMAP support, you could use pine which is
also easy to configure. If you have enough memory, it is better to stick to Thunderbird.
If you need to have a calendar function to schedule meetings, you may use the Lightning extension with Thunderbird.
Old 05-08-2013, 06:13 PM   #18
Registered: Jan 2010
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 597
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 186Reputation: 186
I agree with most of the posters here. I've tried it in the past and found it to be hard to set up, and to offer no real advantages over Thunderbird. Plus I tend to bounce between desktop environments every few months and Kmail isn't really happy outside of KDE.
Old 05-08-2013, 08:32 PM   #19
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Carrollton, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 14.2
Posts: 2,668

Rep: Reputation: 1109Reputation: 1109Reputation: 1109Reputation: 1109Reputation: 1109Reputation: 1109Reputation: 1109Reputation: 1109Reputation: 1109
I've had no issues with it. I access a Dovecot IMAP server that I personally control.

Perhaps my e-mail needs are minimal.
Old 05-08-2013, 10:21 PM   #20
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 5,159

Rep: Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154Reputation: 1154
Claws-mail and IMAP does the trick for me. Claws-mail has a rich feature set and a low memory footprint.
Old 05-09-2013, 01:07 AM   #21
MLED Founder
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, CentOS, FreeBSD
Posts: 3,357

Rep: Reputation: 1905Reputation: 1905Reputation: 1905Reputation: 1905Reputation: 1905Reputation: 1905Reputation: 1905Reputation: 1905Reputation: 1905Reputation: 1905Reputation: 1905
Originally Posted by slackass View Post
The only thing I use kmail for is to send nag-mail to remind someone or myself of something via kalarm and that's only because I can't figure out how to hook thunderbird up to kalarm..
You can have alarm with Thunderbird. Install the Lightning plugin, define an event and activate the "remind me..." function.
Old 05-09-2013, 12:23 PM   #22
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Greece
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 276

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
I have multiple e-mail accounts that I use, as well as an mbox archive (thousands of mails, dating back to 2005). I hadn't tried kmail for 5 years (because I didn't have a positive experience) until a couple of weeks ago. Kmail imported that archive just fine, but everytime I clicked on that folder it'd take a few minutes just to display the contents of the folder. It seems like Kmail for some reason wants to parse all these e-mails every time you click on the folder. With Thunderbird this is instant. If you add the other quirks here and there, and a couple of crashes (I've never had a single crash with Thunderbird)... I'll probably give Kmail another chance in 5 years.
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-09-2013, 12:57 PM   #23
Registered: Jun 2012
Posts: 78

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Originally Posted by Richard Cranium View Post
I've had no issues with it. I access a Dovecot IMAP server that I personally control.
The only time I successfully used KMail was with a Dovecot-offlineimap setup that dumped mail into a maildir. KMail used that maildir quite happily.

That combo was useful with GMail since it eliminated the delays I saw with their IMAP implementation. When I moved to Fastmail, I noticed those delays had vanished and I dumped Dovecot and offlineimap and started using Thunderbird.
Old 05-10-2013, 09:13 AM   #24
Registered: Jul 2009
Location: Canelones, Uruguay
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 139

Rep: Reputation: 38
I used to love KMail before they transitioned to akonadi & friends (KDE 3.x, and earlier KDE4 versions). For me it was by far the most convenient mail client (despise it not being able to compose or forward HTML mail).

When I had to move my main machine to Windows, I really missed it. Installed Thunderbird, but never came close to the same feeling of pleasant ease of use (I don't really like the whole "we don't do x, install an extension" thing for basic stuff like minimizing to the system tray, or the constant updates for things I don't really need), at the end I ditched thunderbird and moved to windows live mail and, with my archive mail stored in a local IMAP server).
I tried to use the new KMail2 it in a VM some time ago, and it is just not the same thing anymore. If it had been the same I remember, I would probably have used it even if it meant to have a VM open only for it. But it has become a pain to setup, and it is much more unstable than what it used to be.

KMail2 has not improved over what we had in KMail before, and sadly the same thing is happening a lot in the free software world.

Last edited by AlvaroG; 05-10-2013 at 09:14 AM.
2 members found this post helpful.


kde, kmail, thunderbird

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
worth the work to switch an old laptop over? badlandsghost Linux - Newbie 18 11-21-2012 11:18 PM
Is Fluxbox worth the work? Dralnu Linux - General 2 08-22-2006 03:10 AM
Trying to Kmail to work royeo Linux - Newbie 1 06-25-2006 12:24 AM
Can't get Kmail to work. HadesThunder Linux - Software 8 12-24-2004 04:28 PM
ALSA fails to work worth a @!@% lopoetve Linux - Hardware 2 08-28-2004 01:19 PM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration